Hi Mack
I would approach it this way
Company code - you can have it in General Data Selection
In the 3rd column, assign local variable for PERIO as PER_ TO and PER_FROM
In the 1st column, assign same local variable PER_TO.
In the 2nd column, assign local variable as PER_TO-1 (minus 1)
that will do the trick
Br. Ajay M
Hi,
Company code ABC1 has a fixed asset #7389 transferred to XYZ1 on 1/28/2010, and then from XYZ1 transferred the same fixed asset to XYZ2 on 10/1/2012.
System showing below dates...
Posting Date CoCd Asset No. Capitalized Date
1/31/2008 ABC1 #7389 1/31/2008
1/28/2010 XYZ1 #1000156 1/28/2010
10/1/2012 XYZ2 #1000127 1/28/2010
My question is that why the asset capitalization date of XYZ1 & XYZ2 are not same as the ABC1 as 1/31/2008, When XYZ1 &XYZ2 both capitalized dates are same?
Thanks
Rafi
Hi Mack
If values in the last month are correct, then they have to be so in current month also unless you do a mistake
Can you send a screen shot of all the columns' period setting
For the current month column, use the local variable as PER_TO
Br. Ajay M
Hi Experts,
while i am doing MIGO(Goods Issue to Production Order, I am getting the below ABAP Error:
Please give solution, It is urgent requirement.
THE ERROR IS:
Short text
Illegal interruption of the event LOAD-OF-PROGRAM.
What happened?
Error in the ABAP Application Program
The current ABAP program "/MRSS/SAPLRAP_INT_OB" had to be terminated because it
has come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
Error analysis
During the flow of the event LOAD-OF-PROGRAM (event for the
initialization of an ABAP program), a condition occurred under which
the event was to be left early. This is not permitted as it would
result in an inconsistent status in the ABAP program.
Trigger Location of Runtime Error
Program /MRSS/SAPLRAP_INT_OB
Include /MRSS/LRAP_INT_OBF00
Row 34
Module type (FORM)
Module Name GLOBAL_INIT
Source Code Extract
Line SourceCde
4
5 *&---------------------------------------------------------------------*
6 *& Form global_init
7 *&---------------------------------------------------------------------*
8 * text
9 *----------------------------------------------------------------------*
10 FORM global_init.
11
12 * local data
13 DATA lv_badi_impl_exists TYPE flag.
14
15
16 * get ref to BAdIs
17 CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance "#EC CI_BADI_GETINST
18 CHANGING
19 instance = gv_ref_badi_inter_company.
20 * CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance
21 * CHANGING
22 * instance = gv_ref_badi_rap_back.
23 * CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance
24 * CHANGING
25 * instance = gv_ref_badi_ps_int.
26 CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance "#EC CI_BADI_GETINST
Dears Experts ,
I have issue when cancel production order and if there any change in prices in raw material it will directly carry out the Cost (price) differences
to Production Variance .
and Report KOC4 [ Variance Category ] is not displayed the above variance .
So i guess if i carry out the price variance for cancellation order to revalaution variance account i think this right solution .
i updated OBYC -> PRD -> PRF to revaluation variance but i face a other problem when orders settled it carry out for revaluation account not production variance account .
and OBYC -> PRD -> PRA Purchase Price Variance Account .
Could You please advise me what can i do to match the production variance account with KOC4 .
For those which is having different values please check
If product cost collectors for materials with separate valuation, all valuation segments posted to in the period need to be standard price-controlled.
Check this thread
Variance between KE30 (COPA) Balance versus GL Balances (GR55)
Thanks
Hrusikesh
Hello,
Need some help regarding settlement error KD503 a user is getting via KO88. User made posting to an incorrect primary cost element (611010). That cost element is NOT included in the allocation structure and it should not be included. The user reversed out the incorrect posting and tried to settle the IO. The KO88 transaction still yields KD503 error. Any ideas what the problem is?
Both transactions were made in currency 'SGD'. When running S_ALR_87012993 to check line item total for 611010 in IO, balance is 0 in 'SGD' but $.06 in CO area currency. Would this be causing the issue?
I'd appreciate your immediate help! I've attached files in case it helps.
Hi Mathew
Nice to be talking to you again
The balance of .06 is not the issue.. You posted a line item in the IO... And then reversed it
So, from system's point of view, it has 2 line items in the IO to be settled..
You will have to include this cost element temporarily in your allocation structure, as a formality.. Once the settlement is done, you can remove it again
Include this Cost ele under any assignment in your allocation structure.. Impact would be null because the 2 line items nullify each other
Br. Ajay M
Hello again Ajay. Thanks for your response. I was hoping we would not have to change the allocation structure config for this. The SAP message is confusing, as it states "You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement". So I thought once the user reversed the incorrect posting, the settlement should work as-is.
Thanks for your help!
Hi,
For internal orders try to add the custom fields in the COAS table so that same will reflect in the KOK5.
Please let me know if you need any further help.
Regards,
Ravi
Dear Ajay,
Thanks for the reply. Here are the screen shots.
For the general data selection tab
For the first column "current month" i.e. for the month
For the second column "Last Months"
For the third column "Cumulative" i.e. year to date
Following is the result of KE30
Values for the period 010.2013
You can see that values in the report for the period 011.2013 contains value for the previous period which is 59090.21
This value is matching when the report is run for the period 010.2013.
But in both the reports,the figures for Current month and YTD (year to date) are same.
Please let me know what setting is required in the current month column.
Regards,
makrand
Hi Amrit,
Generally Profit center comes through Material Master whereas Business Area comes via Plant or Substitution rule.
I think for first Screen shot, while creating PO it was not selected as WBS. you can see this in ME23N Transaction code Account Assignment.
In the second screen shot, if you observed the business area is different compare with first screen shot.It means that Inputs are different compare with first PO.
Can you compare Material code, Plant & Account Assignment for both PO's. There must be different inputs.
Thanks.
Dear Emad
If you reverse the material document (MIGO reversal), I don't think any difference for material price will come. In my opinion system will reverse the material issue on the same price which was considered at the goods issue document. Check this and revert.
Regards
Rajneesh Saxena
Hi,
SES should be acting exactly like GR from budgetary point of view. PO is generating commitment, which is further reduced by GR/SES and 'converted' to actuals. If GR/SES is reversed, this re-opens the commitment, but your budget consumption does not change. Example: PO of 100 EUR and further GR (or SES) of 15 EUR will still provide budgetary consumption of 100 EUR, no matter if this GR/SES is reversed afterwards.
Regards,
Eli
Thanks so much ELI! How can we then reduce that committment? Essentially the engineer added a line to the PO by mistake. The commitment is overstated and we would like to reduce it. If they would "delete" that PO line would it reduce the commitment?
Thanks,
Aaron
I totally agree with .
During my Review i found that the Finished Product When cancel Production Order some times created in another cost that i confirmed with it .
so will carry out the variance between STD price when cancel confirmation and confirmation .
really i cant calculate the STD price has been entered when cancel confirmation it's not matched for any released cost for any month .
we work as STD price and reevaluate the STD price at beginning of each month .
i will check the causes of change Standard price and i will communicate with you again .
if you know any logical reason could for that could you help me ,
Noticed :- The cancel confirmation at the same date of confirmation of order
Dear Emad
The same should hold for FGs also if GR document reversal is done in the same period in your case. However I have not observed this any time, Secondly it is really surprising that the reversal price of FG is not matching with any of the standard price. Can you please post screen of reversal document, costing 1 & 2 tab of FG material,Material valuation tab of your valuation variant and date control setup? I will try to see through.
Regards
Rajneesh Saxena
Dear Rajneesh ,
Appreciate your professionalism of support ,
could you find the attached of valuation variant and other movement .
Material Master
Valuation Variant
Journal Of Confirmation Of production order
Journal Of Cancellation of Confirmation production order
Hi Sap guru,
when we run ck11n, some of the activities shown in milliseconds instead of minutes, in routing and work centers they maintained in minutes, and activity prices are maintained in hours, please help, is it really co issue or pp issue.
Regards,
Hanumantha Rao