Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP ERP Financials - Controlling
Viewing all 8508 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Re: VPRS in COPA coresponding to value from goods receipt

May 16, 2014, 7:24 am
$
0
0

Hi

 

If you are saying that VPRS value is not the same as PGI Value (COGS posted in FI), then you should have a look at the settings mentioned below

 

In billing, if you want to know how the system has fetched the VPRS value, Go to the condition tab of the billing document, select the VPRS condition type and click on blue lens at the bottom left.

 

If the condition control field is set to
· 'H', the cost was taken from the goods issue (Ideal situation)

· 'A', it was redetermined from the valuation segment of the material master

· in case of 'D' or 'E' it was copied from the preceding document

 

Br. Ajay M

↧
Search

Re: Overhead (using Templates) on the basis Machine Hrs

May 16, 2014, 7:26 am
$
0
0

Hi Deepak

 

Its very much possible.. arturo senosain has contributed a doc,, Check that

 

Its possible with Costing Sheet as well. You dont need template allocation for that

 

If you have not consumed 6 activity types in your work center, I would suggest add one more activity type for Overheads which will be Copy of Machine Hours..

 

You mention same qty as for machine hrs and then just calculate Activity prices as usual..

 


Br. Ajay M

↧
↧

Strange behaviour of profit centre

May 16, 2014, 7:30 am
$
0
0

Dear all,

 

We defined profit centre by company code.

 

Eg.:

Company code XX01

     Profit center     XX01AAAAA

                           XX01AAAAB

Company code YY01

     Profit center     YY01AAAAA

                           YY01AAAAB

A user saved sucessfully a posting from company code XX01 with a profit centre YY01AAAAB.

But in transaction KE53 we can see that configuration is correct.

 

Any ideas?

 

Thanks

 

David

↧

Re: Activity Price Calculation Issue

May 16, 2014, 7:50 am
$
0
0

Hi Bashir....

 

Do you use the concept of cost center splitting?

 

 

 

Regards..

Jose

↧

Re: Strange behaviour of profit centre

May 16, 2014, 8:12 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

What are the entries in CEPC_BUKRS table for these profit centres? Do you have company code validation activated for controlling area (OKKP)?

 

Regards,


Eli

↧
↧

Target costs without origin for external operation in CO-PC-OBJ s.info

May 16, 2014, 10:07 am
$
0
0

KKBC_ORD.PNG

 

 

Hi SAP gurus,

 

 

I´m facing in CO03 cost analysis that external operations has description for actual/plan values, but targets costs appear like (without origin) for the same scenario.

 

Then, i have duplicate lines and deviations (like structural deviations).

 

 

I appreciatte the feedback for this issue.

 

Kind regards.

↧

Re: Cost Splitting - KSS2

May 16, 2014, 10:26 am
$
0
0

Hi

I have attached the KL03 screenshot. This same setting we have for all activities,

 

Only issue is KSS2 why only the Cost elements under the top node of the group are getting picked for Target cost based split and cost element in 2nd group split based on activity which was defined in splitting structure.

 

Regards

Aravind

 

kl03.jpg

↧

Re: VPRS in COPA coresponding to value from goods receipt

May 16, 2014, 10:23 am
$
0
0

Hi Ajay sir.....

 

Correct me if I am wrong, Zara is not saying VPRS value is not the same as PGI. Zara's concern is GR is happening with P1 standard price and PGI is happening with P2 (new cost estimate). Zara wants to have PGI also with the P1 cost estimate. (ultimate aim is to have VPRS value to be picked from GR, i.e. P1 cost estimate ----- in this case)

Whatever the 1st answer given by you is the ideal one, but Zara's concern is if she uses the previous cost estimate, for this scenario it matches, but if GR and PGI happens in the same period (i.e. current period) there will be a problem, system considers the previous cost estimate instead of current.

 

 

@ ZARA:

I hope my understanding is right, if not excuse me for misunderstanding.

And I hope this is the standard behavior....

 

 

 

Regards....

Jose

↧
Search

Sales Order/Item as Account Assignment in Accounting Doc.

May 16, 2014, 11:03 am
$
0
0

I have a scenario where we are selling some services. Process is to create sales order --> Create billing document in reference to sales order & then release it to accounting. I am using materials of type DIEN( service) for the purpose and have customized the sales order / item category. Process is working fine till creation of accounting document but the accounting document is missing sales order/item in it [as account assignment]. I am not sure what config I am missing.

 

Attached file shows where I am expecting the sales order / item to be seen.

 

Please provide hints on this.

 

Thanks in advance.

Sonal

↧
↧

OKENN issue

May 16, 2014, 1:42 pm
$
0
0

Hi Gurus ,

I have deleted a cost centre in transaction KS02 but it was still displaying in OKENN ( standard hierarchy display)

I went to OKENN and run the master data comparison and the cost centre disappear from the  standard hierarchy tree. but I notice that there are some cost centre for which  hierarchy group has change for and which still in the old hierarchy node , they all have moved to the changed hierarchy which is fine but is there any consequences to this as this is happening in the live system and my ID is in there.

Please advise

many thanks

 

Cecile

↧

Re: Sales Order/Item as Account Assignment in Accounting Doc.

May 16, 2014, 9:14 pm
$
0
0

Hi Sonal

 

If you want the billing doc to post in the sales order as cost object, then your GL has to be cost element and the account assignment category in Sales order must be E

 

Check the Requiremebt Type in the Procurement tab of sales order.

 

This RT is assigned to a Requirement Class and the RC is mapped to Acct Assgn Catg.

 

Spro - Cost object controlling - prod cost by sales order - control of sales order related.....

 

In this node you can see which RC is assigned to RT

 

Br. Ajay M

↧

Re: OKENN issue

May 16, 2014, 9:43 pm
$
0
0

Hi Ajay,

you've just saved my life. thanks a lot for your reply.

So helpful . I can see from your details that you are an SAP trainer ? How to get in touch with you?

kind regards

Cecile

↧

Re: Product Costing - Process Order Confirmation

May 17, 2014, 1:30 am
$
0
0

Dear Ajay Bhai,

 

I am little confused now

 

Please clear my understanding. Your last comment means we do not have to use BTE for our scenario.

 

What we have to do is to settle the order on WIP after first phase of process order confirmation in order to post WIP in FI. Same practise we will do after confirmation of all phases until system posts Goods Receipt.

 

PLEASE CORRECT ME IF I AM WRONG?

 

Regards,

Zain Bashir

↧
↧

Re: Activity Price Calculation Issue

May 17, 2014, 1:45 am
$
0
0

applied after your intimation.

 

Thanks

↧

COPA and FI reconciliation report

May 17, 2014, 3:01 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

We are implementing costing based COPA for Product wise profitability report and revenues will be uploaded directly to COPA through external data transfer. The revenue g/l are made on the nature of services provided by the company and not to products offered by the client.

 

My queries are:

 

1. Is there any possibility to provide FI &COPA reconciliation report within COPA.


2. Is there any possibility to provide reconciliation report to check variance between FI vs System (Auto feed) data before uploading to CO-PA.(As the data which is to be posted to COPA will also be provided in Ztable in SAP).

 

3.Is there any possibility to give selection parameter  ( Region hierarchy/ Product hierarchy wise) along with date parameter in a Profitability report in COPA.

 

Regards

Nitisha

↧
Search

Re: FBl3n -Offset account no

May 17, 2014, 8:57 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

You can try the following OSS notes

  • 1504612 - Line items: Offsetting account info (BAdI FI_ITEMS_CH_DATA)
  • 1323512 - Line items: BADI FI_ITEMS_CH_DATA

 

Thanks.

 

regards,
Jack

↧

Re: COPA and FI reconciliation report

May 17, 2014, 10:11 am
$
0
0

Hi NItu

 

1. No, there is no such report possible

 

2. Same as above.

 

3. Yes, its possible.,. You need to have those chars in COPA

 

For 1 and 2 - To minimise the cases of reco, post to COPA through FI i.e. when you post to FI, choose PSG as the CO object

 

Br. Ajay M

↧
↧

Re: COPA and FI reconciliation report

May 17, 2014, 10:18 am
$
0
0

Hi Ajay,

 

Since the requirement is such that we have to upload data directly in COPA , so we cannot post data into COPA through FI postings.

 

Can you given me some reasons for "NO" word for point 1 and 2, so that I can convince others easily.

 

Regards

Nitisha

↧

Re: OKENN issue

May 17, 2014, 11:41 am
$
0
0

Hi Cecile

 

Glad to know that your problem is resolved.

 

You can see my mail in my profile. I can't type it here as per forum rules.

 

I have added you as a connection and you would receive a notification. You can add me too and then send a direct message. This is another option

 

If the issue is resolved, you may close the thread at your convenience. To close it, you can click on "assumed anaswred" or you can mark any of the above reply as " correct answer" in case any reply helped you resolve it

 

Br. Ajay M

↧

Top Down Distribution

May 17, 2014, 11:43 am
$
0
0

Hi Expert,

I am very new in TDD (Top Down Distribution) in COPA, as of now i am very aware with this word but i never do this Practically.

I also follow this link Top down Distribution explained with an example - ERP Financials - SCN Wiki but due to its Complexity

i am unable to understand it properly that in which situation we have to perform TDD and how to perform this. I am eager to

learn this. Waiting for your valuable solution.


       Regards

Ajay Kumar Mishra

↧
Viewing all 8508 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>