Thank you so much Ajay..
Reg
Karthikeyan G
↧
Re: COPA report format
↧
Re: CO-PC: WIP works, but does not generate quantity documents
Yes... but even to new generated wip we have no documents... so far, our system generated zero quantity documents.
Thanks for your help, I will let you know if I find a solution.
Cheers
Marcelo
↧
↧
Re: Issue with controlling document.
Hi Chandra,
Also can you please let me know if the cost can be allocated/settled to secondary cost element in the above mentioned scenario and what does the "Val/COArea Crcy" in COEP table suggest or in other words if there is any value in Val/COArea field of COEP what does it mean ??
Regards,
praveen Kumar
↧
Re: Material Price Analysis-CKM3N
Hi Iwan.
If you are in a productive system,, i suppose you fully tested the solution. Im afraid I couldnt help you, i dont have Idea the reason of the problem.
Maybe you could write SAP in the Marketplace.
Arturo.
↧
Scheduler for period end closing Activity
Dear Experts,
Our client want to define scheduler (schedule job) for period end activity which should calculate:
1. Production order Revaluation
2. Variance Calculation, KKS1
3. WIP Calculation, KKAO
4. Actual Settlement, CO88
So kindly let me know how to fix this in background with minimum manual intervention.
We need to do this for 9-10 plants, so how we need to take this:
1. To execute all the steps(1,2,3,4 and 5) for plant wise.
2. Or to execute 1st step for all the plants and then second onwards.
Because we need to consider the system performance as well. Thanks in advance for help.
Regards
Mohit Singla
↧
↧
Re: Scheduler for period end closing Activity
Mohit,
To schedule a period end activities you can club them in one job and create a variant for each individual program for i.e-Variance calculation ( KKS1) . Go to SE38 type RKKKS1N0 and create a variant where you can set parameters likes plants, order type, target cost version etc. Do the same for each of the activities you want then schedule a background job.
Follow one of my document Basics of variance calculation-Understanding Pe... | SCN
Thanks
Hrusikesh
↧
Re: Company Code Currency Change
Thanks Ajay Sir,
Understood. Could you pls. help me in resolving below points as well if time permits to you?
1. Is it advisable like using other options such as creating new company codes? because i have seen in so many thread giving advices to create new Company code without going for a change over in the currency.
2. Or will it be advisable for using parallel currency USD instead of going for Change over of Local currency( note that existing parallel currency(LC2-USD) conversion takes place on the basis of local currency1.) with the change of conversion from the basis of local currency1 to transaction currency as the basis. Do we need SLO support for this as well.
also note our book dep. is in local currency (i.e. country currency). group currency (USD) transactions are derived from posting in book depreciation.
Regarding IAS, It is true that IAS is not forcing to use USD as FC but IAS has clearly defined what should be a FC currency of a company and the criterion in selecting FC.
According to that our company's FC is USD.
As per IAS below are the criterion ranking top to bottom
Functional currency of an entity will be the
currency that,
Influences the revenue of the entity
Influences the pricing policy of the entity
Influences the material, labour and other costs
In which finance is generated
In which receipts are retained
As my client fulfills all above and USD is considered as the FC.
thanks in advance,
Aziz
↧
Re: WIP in case of status GLFT?
Hi,
thanks but I guess this is not a possible solution as the transaction to post WIP is the same as you use for settlement of orders...
Thanks!
Sandra
↧
Material Ledger Value Flow Monitor CKMVFM question
Hello,
I am researching the Value Flow Monitor report CKMVFM. On my test material, it is showing a balance in FI, and a red indicator on the FI/ML status. I assume this means there is a discrepancy between FI and Material Ledger, but I don't know how to go about researching this. I have completed all steps in the Closing Cockpit. How do I explain the difference between FI and ML, or go about reconciling the two? Thanks in advance for your assistance!
↧
↧
Error when create Operating Concern
Hi Experts;
At the time of creating a new operating concern after i have defined Characteristics and Value Fields, and checking the status I received the following error:
Error generating table KOMPAKE
Message no. KE434
Diagnosis
An error occurred while Table KOMPAKE was being generated.
Procedure
Analyze the error using Transaction SE11. Use the function 'Check'.
Then I wen to SE11 to check giving the table name as mentioned above, I found the following and could not fix the error;
Then after opening the Long Text it gave the following message:
Enhancement category for table missing
Message no. DT192
Procedure
Maintain the enhancement category in the table or structure maintenance in the ABAP Dictionary.
Then by opening the ((enhancement category)) link i received the following message then STOPPED where I could not do anything more!!!
Enhancement Category Selection
Definition
Structures and tables that were defined by SAP in the ABAP Dictionary can be enhanced subsequently by customers using Customizing includes or append structures. The enhancements do not only refer to structures/ tables themselves, but also to dependent structures that adopt the enhancement as an include or referenced structure. Append structures that only take effect at the end of the original structure can also cause shifts - in the case of dependent structures - even within these structures.
You must select an enhancement category for the following reason: In programs where there is no active Unicode check, enhancements to tables and structures can cause syntax and runtime errors during type checks and particularly in combination with deep structures.
In programs where there is an active Unicode check, statements, operand checks, and accesses with an offset and length are problematic - for example, if numeric or deep components are inserted into a purely character-type structure and the structure thus loses its character- type nature.
Depending on the structure definition, the radio buttons allowed in the dialog box are ready for input. Choose one of the possible enhancement categories:
- Cannot be enhanced
- The structure must not be enhanced.
- Can be enhanced or character type
- All structure components and their enhancements must be character-type (C, N, D, or T). The original structure and all enhancements through Customizing includes or through append structures are subject to this limitation.
- Can be enhanced or character-type or numeric
- The structure and its enhancement must not contain any deep data types (tables, references, strings).
- Can be enhanced in any way
- The structure and its enhancement may contain components whose data type can be of any type.
- Not classified
- This category can be chosen, for example, for a transition status; however, it must not be chosen for creating structures.
The rules for defining the enhancement category result implicitly from the structure setup and the classification of the types used. These rules are as follows:
- If the object contains at least one numeric type or a substructure or component (field has a structure/table/view as its type) that can be enhanced numerically, the object can no longer be enhanced character-type, but is itself, at most, enhanceable character-type or numeric.
- If the object contains a deep component (string, reference, or table type), or it contains a substructure or component that is marked as enhanceable in any way, then the object itself is enhanceable in any way.
- If the object does not contain any substructure or component that is marked as enhanceable, you can select cannot be enhanced. If the structure has not yet been enhanced, you can choose the category cannot be enhanced in any case.
If you are creating new tables and structures in the ABAP Dictionary, the system proposes the category can be enhanced in any way as standard value for the classification of the enhancement options. If the developer chooses a more restrictive classification than can be enhanced in any way for a particular structure, then only the classification levels that adhere to the rules above are allowed. It is not possible to choose an enhancement option of a structure that is more restrictive than the classification resulting immplicitly from the structure setup and from the classification of the types used. Therefore, only the allowed categories are proposed for selection in the maintenance user interface.
If a structure depends on one or several other structures, the smallest category is chosen as implicit classification (in the order cannot be enhanced< can be enhanced and character-type< can be enhanced and character-typeor numeric < can be enhanced in any way). This classification is greater than or less than the category in the other structures and also greater than or the same as the category that results from the actual setup in the original structure itself.
For more information, refer to the online documentation (pushbutton "i").
Thanks in advance;
Best regards;
Ahmad Mahmud;
↧
Re: AWTYP in the table BKPF
Hi,
AWTYP (Reference Transaction) is a field where posts automatically while posting the Accounting document number.
There are different kind of Reference Transaction are there.
1. From FI side Accounting document BKPF
2. From MM side Material document MKPF
3. From SD side Billing document VBRK
Those are standard SAP Reference Transactions, system itself updates that field, we can't change those types.
Logically Reference Transaction is as same as Header Table
Ravi Polampalli
↧
Loading Ex Gain/loss on material with CKMLCP
Hi Gurus,
I am facing one issue with material ledger and seeking you suggestion.
There are 2 accounts 514000 (for ex gain) and 514001( for ex loss). Whenever there is gain/loss posting to these accounts wrt import MIRO, such gain/loss would get loaded on material through CKMLCP - costing cockpit execution. And it would generate opposit posting to these accounts.
(note: other gain/loss posting also go to these 2 accounts)
Per requirement, to have separate account for posting only import MIRO exchange gain/loss , I defined a substitution.So whenever there ex gain/loss system posts it to account 520001.
I ran one import cycle(PO, MIGO and MIRO), As per exchange rate in MIRO, there is ex gain posting to account 520001 as expected.
But when I run CKMLCP, this gain is not getting loaded on material. In CKM3, ex gain amount is shown in Ex Rt diff. column. And same amount is displaying in Differences column.
Could you pl suggest why its not getting loaded on material.
Price control in material master is S(std price) and price determination is 3 (Single-/Multilevel)
Thank you in advance
Regards
Anand
↧
error in Variance calculation : Error when converting the costing date --> posting period :
H Alli,
I am trying to calculate variance for production order, through KKS2 , and I get the below error.
Error when converting the costing date --> posting period
I checked the fiscal year variant
PLease hlep me resolve the error.
Regards
SR
↧
↧
Re: error in Variance calculation : Error when converting the costing date --> posting period :
Hello Swastik,
What date is you costing date? when is the variance calculation date?
One thing i see here is your special period suppose to be 12-16 from Period 2 . As you have special period 4.
so it should be like this in OB52
period 1- 1-12 and then period 2- 12-16
you're using a fiscal year variant that is "year-dependent" and thus you have to maintain this customizing every year in OB29 check if it is maintained.
Thanks
Hrusikesh
↧
Re: error in Variance calculation : Error when converting the costing date --> posting period :
HI Hrusikesh,
Thanks.
But I dont think special periods are coming in to picture here.
And the fiscal year variant is not year dependent. In the above screenshot you can see the K4 variant used.
Regards
SR
↧
Re: error in Variance calculation : Error when converting the costing date --> posting period :
Swastik,
Yes i know i am just pointing out the config as per your screenshot.
What is order status of the now which you are trying to settle?
Which period you are trying to settle?
Is that period is unlocked in OKP1 as well?
Check these stuff need more information
Thanks
Hrusikesh
↧
Re: error in Variance calculation : Error when converting the costing date --> posting period :
Hi Hrusikesh,
Order status is TECO.I am trying to settle in period 6.
OKP1 periods are not locked.has it got something to do with the versions?
Regards
SR
↧
↧
Re: error in Variance calculation : Error when converting the costing date --> posting period :
Swastik,
Check the version ( For your version) settings in T-code OKEQ as well there might be your year missing in setting for each fiscal year.
Thanks
Hrusikesh
↧
Re: error in Variance calculation : Error when converting the costing date --> posting period :
Hi Swastik
Few question for better understanding.
1 In the earlier periods were you able to do KKS2 for orders?
2 Have you done any changes in the fiscal year variant recently?
3 What is the costing date from and to for the header material in the order?
4 Why are you calculating variance now for 6th period? As per your fiscal year 6th period is just started and this is normally a period end activity.
5 In OMSY the period status is the same as in OB52?
6 In MMRV what is the open period?
7 In OKEQ have you maintained version for current fiscal year?
8 Are you able to post entries in FI?
Regards
Rajneesh Saxena
↧
Re: error in Variance calculation : Error when converting the costing date --> posting period :
Swastik
One more Q: TECO date falls in KKS2 period?
Rajneesh
↧