Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP ERP Financials - Controlling
Viewing all 8508 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Result Analysis with Variable value

August 6, 2014, 7:53 am
$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

 

 

we have a problem in RA calculation for Service Orders.  Problem is we have two RA ( 00001 keys one is used by Dynamic Items and another without Dynamic items (00002)

 

When we use RA (00001) in which service Order actual cost posted to actual Fixed cost ( which can be see in Plan/Actual report). when we run KKA1 against this RA key it is not posting to Fixed cost under Result analysis Line IDs

 

This is not the case with RA (00002). Here in the service order if we post the cost to actual fixed cost then same split is happening to Fixed cost in RA calculation and if it posted to Actual variable cost, same split is happening to Actual variable cost

 

My question is, is there any configuration in backend to behave the split exactly the same way in the service Order? Only change is one is usisng Dynamic Items and another RA is normal

 

Do Let me know whether is the Control to happen this split

 

thanks

sarvan

↧
Search

Re: Reverse posting key specification is missing for posting key 93. Message F5522

August 7, 2014, 4:55 am
$
0
0

Go to OB41, Double click on posting key 93.

Maintain the Reversal posting key.

dev.jpg

You have to maintain the Reversal posting key to use the posting key.

↧
↧

Re: TDS posting during invoice & payment

August 7, 2014, 5:37 am
$
0
0

Hi

 

i have done the same and tested, it is working fine but when i check the vendor balance in FBL1N , still advance amount is showing open item though i clear with F_54

 

Regards,

Naru

↧

Re: Reverse posting key specification is missing for posting key 93. Message F5522

August 7, 2014, 5:47 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

The settlement when carried out in the 5th month has posted to 81 and 96.

 

so what is the reason for not having the same error in the 5 th month.

 

I do understand that maintaining reversal posting key will fix the issue but want to know the reason.

 

thanks and regards

SAP FICO

↧

Re: Reverse posting key specification is missing for posting key 93. Message F5522

August 7, 2014, 5:51 am
$
0
0

sapfi co wrote:

 

The settlement when carried out in the 5th month has posted to 81 and 96.

 

Have a look into your error message. It shows the posting key 93.

↧
↧

Help for not released SAP Note 1179482

August 7, 2014, 5:52 am
$
0
0

Dear all,

 

I have some problems with transaction CLOCOC (Message TK430 - Cient & has statut 'not modifiable').

I found solution using SAP Note 1179482 but this SAP Note is not released and no more available.

We do not want to use tranport request for CLOCOC transaction.

 

Some still got this SAP Note or some information about the solution?

 

Thanks.

 

David

↧

Re: Reverse posting key specification is missing for posting key 93. Message F5522

August 7, 2014, 6:00 am
$
0
0

Hello Dev

 

when the settlement for the order is carried out in the 4th month(july) it gives the blocking error

 

Reverse posting key specification is missing for posting key 93

Message no. F5522

 

but when carried out in 5th (august) month it is giving no error and postings done to 81 and 96

↧

Re: Intercompany transactions between 2Cosin different controlling area

August 7, 2014, 6:08 am
$
0
0

Incorrect, cross-company postings could be done between the companies with two different controlling areas.

↧
Search

Re: Reverse posting key specification is missing for posting key 93. Message F5522

August 7, 2014, 6:13 am
$
0
0

If you see description for the posting key 93, it shows "Price difference"

Can you explain what are you trying to do. Please explain your all steps which you are doing.

As per your statement, somehow system is taking the posting key 93 during the month July.

↧
↧

Re: Reverse posting key specification is missing for posting key 93. Message F5522

August 7, 2014, 6:21 am
$
0
0

Hi.

 

 

Please run Tcode OBYC, go to line Cost (price) differences (mater.ledger) Transaction PRY and verify whether accounts and Key configurations are ok.

 

 

Kind Regards.

 

Jandoval Nascimento

↧

Re: Asset Settlement from AUC to Main asset

August 7, 2014, 6:38 am
$
0
0

Hi

 

Please check the below:

 

1. If you have maintained cost center as account assignment object for your company code in T Code ACSET

 

2. Does the accounting document used for Asset Settlement has the Business Transaction and variant assigned as 0000 and 0001. This is assuming you use method 0000012 for splitting.

 

Thanks & regards


Sanil Bhandari

↧

Re: Calculation of Actual Product Cost using Cost Sheet

August 8, 2014, 2:26 am
$
0
0

Hi

 

KGI2 / CO43 - Actual Overhead Calculation

 

KKS2 / KKS1 - Variance Calculation

 

KO88 / CO88- Settlement

 

 

 

 

 

 

Br,

 

Ramesan

↧

Re: Calculation of Actual Product Cost using Cost Sheet

August 8, 2014, 4:05 am
$
0
0

Hi Ramesan

 

Thanks for the reply.

 

After settlement if i want to see the the actual vs plan for a period and for a material is there any T-code available, please share that also.

 

Thanks in advance

Subrata

↧
↧

Re: Calculation of Actual Product Cost using Cost Sheet

August 8, 2014, 4:14 am
$
0
0

Hi Subrata,

If you have not maintained routing and BOM how are you getting planned price in CK11n?

If you have created costing sheet for overhead, what are your bases?

Pls give more information.

 

BR

Abhi

↧

Re: Calculation of Actual Product Cost using Cost Sheet

August 8, 2014, 4:37 am
$
0
0

Hi Abhi

 

My requirement is some how different from other COPC. Basically It is a Power generation Co. for Power production they are creating Plan Process order for the month. Later they are creating Process order in ref. to plan and confirming daily wise. As there is no fixed base of RM Consumption they r creating and confirming the process order at the end of 3rd shift every day. So they can't maintain any hrs for a process or unit to be produced. As the Quantity produced for the day is later will be recalculated in rectifier. So based on the rectifier data system will get to know the actual production Quantity in MW/Hrs.

 

So the strategy in such way, at the end of the month based on cost plant wise expenses, SO Raw material Cost Elements are set in the Cost sheet base and for the other expenses and all percentages are set based on the base in the cost sheet. Here based on the Actual data percentages are set in Cost sheet.

 

So in CK11N system is calculating planned price based on cost sheet only.

 

I think the flow is clear now and my requirement also


Thanks & Regards

Subrata

↧
Search

Re: Calculation of Actual Product Cost using Cost Sheet

August 8, 2014, 5:11 am
$
0
0

Hi Subrata,

I have no knowledge of this scenario so you better wait for other experts' comments.

 

BR

Abhi

↧

GB02-number ranges

August 8, 2014, 5:48 am
$
0
0

Hi sap guru,

can u please tell me how to assign number ranges AO AND PO company code wise, we have more than 10 company codes to assign in gb02, please help me out of this.

 

 

Regards,

Hanumantha Rao.

↧
↧

OKG3_RA Key

August 8, 2014, 6:36 am
$
0
0

Hello All,

Under Planned Values We have maintained Overrun & Line ID. As per our observation because of this system calculates WIP after TECO.

 

Now we want to remove this so after that system will not calculate WIP after TECO & order will get closed. Kindly tell what are the impact of this on

current open orders. Is this correct way to do this? 

RA Key.JPG

 

Regards

KP

↧

CO-PA for retail?

August 8, 2014, 7:00 am
$
0
0

Hello SCN folks,

 

I would like to know if SAP has introduced a CO-PA module optimized for retail? If so, where do I get more information on it?

 

Thanks

Sangamesh

↧

Re: target costs of a production order: What material cost estimate is used

August 8, 2014, 7:09 am
$
0
0

thanks for the clear information sir

↧
Viewing all 8508 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>