Hi Manish Sharma,
Thank you for your reply.
In our scernario only "POWER" activity is dependent,all other are activities are independent.
We did not paln KP06, planned only KP26 Activity prices.
I have mapped splitting structure as i said above.
Please advise on KSS2 and KSII Calculation.
Regards,
Vivaan
Dear Experts,
we encounter some problems when reversing allocations with KEU5 (using KSU5 in the background). When doing so all 4 update processes will be occupied by the system on our 2 servers. Which means that the systems is blocked.
Thanks in advance for help and best regards
Melanie
Hi Experts:
I may have in cost center accounting actual and statistical cost. So, for example, when we allocate to a profit segment and to a cost center in the same allocation, the system creates an statistical ítem in the cost center (value type '11').
However, I don't know how to plan statistical value in the cost centers planning in order to monitor the actual Vs planning in the year. I see the value type '10' exists as a statistical value plan but I don't know the way to plan it. I can't see any key figures for stastical values in planning layouts...
Moreover, there are configurated columns in standard report scontaining value type '10'.
Thanks in advance for your help
Best regards
Jose
Hi
Why? what is stopping you from using product costing if valuation is at co code level.
Regards
Rajneesh Saxena
Good morning everyone,
I'm trying to display a warning message in a user-exit used in a substitution but I can't seem to get it to work.
I've tried the following methods:
MMPUR_MESSAGE FORCED 'W' 'ME' '099' 'Test' '' '' ''.
4. INCLUDE MM_MESSAGES_MAC.
MMPUR_MESSAGE 'W' 'ME' '099' 'Test' '' '' ''.
For each one it enters but the program does not stop and it never shows the message. Error messages work but the user does not want an error, only a warning message. Is it possible to show a warning message in this user-exit substitution or should I just inform the user we're going to use a pop up?
Hi,
I don't think that warning message will be shown in the substitution user-exit. You can use validation option instead, defining the same pre-requisites as you have in your substitution.
Regards,
Eli
Hi Chandrasekhar,
I am not trying to deactivate ML, I am trying to deactivate the actual costing functionality of ML, while keeping ML still active.
Wanted to know after deactivating actual costing, will I still be able to see this plant in CKMLCP and if I can still run closing for this plant (I would think no, but wanted to confirm the system behavior in this case).
Thanks,
Balram
We are in NEW GL with activated Integrated Planning in OKEV (Maintain Settings of Version 0 in Controlling Area for 2014).
Our users plan Costs for Cost Centers / Cost Elements in KP06.
The planned values are stored in the tables COSP and FAGLFLEXT.
This process is in use since 2009.
For some reason FAGLFLEXT/FAGLFLEXP have not been updated after a planned value had been changed for Cost Center XXXXX and Cost Element YYYYYY (in KP06). As a result, our financial reports that are based on FAGLFLEXT table are showing incorrect planned value.
Here are the steps:
Step (1)
Transaction KP06:
Cost Center=XXXXX,
Cost Element=YYYYYY,
Planned Cost 12,000
After Step (1) FAGLFLEXT for Profit Center XXXXX and GL=YYYYYY got updated accordingly.
Step (2)
Transaction KP06:
Cost Center=XXXXX,
Cost Element=YYYYYY,
Planned Cost was changed to 1,200
After Step (2) FAGLFLEXT for Profit Center XXXXX and GL=YYYYYY stayed UNCHANGED (12,000)!
We’ve run the same scenario in DEV and QA systems but the problem was not replicated:
FAGLFLEXT/FAGLFLEXP are in sync with COSP and are got updated every time the planned costs are changed in KP06.
Does somebody have an idea why FAGLFLEXT hadn't been updated?
Thank you in advance
My question is : when we do cost rollup, ck11n, activity type quantity is directly getting from routing, in my case 30 minutes or costing lot size/base quantity* 30 minutes?
anyone can explain ?
Hi,
In costing type defination, we have the miscellaneous tab. There we have a calculation base for overhead application and partner version.
Just wanted to know the significance of the same. We already have the costing sheet and this we can incorporate in to the costing variant.
Then what is the significance of this calculation base?
Regards
SR
Hi Experts,
Is there any table or any way to see the see the changes of output layout.
Regards,
Sekhar
Hello All Experts,
This is my first post on SDN. Feeling quite excited !!! 
I am facing an issue for one material where I can see "Goods Receipt" is happened with value of Rs 0.01. I am not able to understand that why goods receipt got posted with value of 0.01 ?
One what basis system decides goods receipt value ? Suppose I have product with Cost Estimate value of Rs 1,000 and Actual got posted of Rs 990 what will be value of my goods receipt ?
The Goods Receipt value should be value of "Actuals" ? or something else ? Which and What "Factors" decides the GR Value ? How the GR value is calculated ?
For my current scenario I can see Rs 0.01 value of GR how this is ?
Experts please guide on above scenario and understanding of GR procedure.
Regards,
Tanisha Kulkarni.
Hi,
I have search through the forum but unable to find any answer to my question. I have one controlling area in which currency type is 30, Currency is USD and also Different company code currency check is checked. now i need to assign this co area to 3 different company codes. one of which has the company code currency USD, 2nd one has the currency EUR and 3rd is GBP. all three company codes have the sasme fiscal year and chart of account as being assigned to Controlling area. my question is by these controlling area settings will the user be able to see the CO reporting in their company code currency? or do i have to change the settings.
please also note that one company code has already been gone live and we are developing the two new company codes with different currencies. no group currency has been maintained in first company code. how ever for the two new company codes we will define the group currencies.
Regards,
Hello SAP experts,
I like to know how to create Cash Flow Statement using FSI4 and other FSI* t-code. I am trying to Create INT cash statement by using OB58. I dont know how to create INT statement. I have list of accounts that should needed in Cash Flow statement. Can you experts please help me that how can I create this.
Thank you
Mona
Hello,
we run KSB1 in English language and "Cost element description" is filled with name of what is in master data of cost element. Description of account/cost element are maintained in different languages as well.
but when I logged into SAP with Spanish language, and ran KSB1 with the same parameters, the field "Cost element description" is empty. But for some accounts it works also with different languages...
is there any other setting apart the one in master data?
thanks for letting me know
Hana
Rosana,
Have you solved the issue? I solved mine applying SAP NOTE 1579535 (Complete materials report from ML splitted by cost elements). Check it and tell me if is useful for you.
Regards,
Jaisson.
hello gurus, I need to create 1600 tax codes, and the system is limited to 1296 code only, any Ideas how to handle this
Thanks in advance
Hi Gurus!
I need to assign a cost element group to CO-PA value field, in order to add this value field to a profitability report KE30.
I have already done the following activities:
1. Maintain value field.
2. Maintain Operating concern
3. Maintain PA transfer structure for Assigning the Cost Elements and value field on tcode KEI1.
2.Insert value field to KE30 Form.
However when I run KE30 Report the value field is empty(any data hasn't transfered from FI).
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Best Regards.
Hi CO Gurus,
In normal FI posting we derive functional areas from the cost centers assigned in the line items.
However when we execute CO Assessments SAP pushes the functional area of the sender cost center to the receiver cost center even when actual functional area assigned to the receiver cost center is different.
For example,
Cost Center A - FA - FAME
Cost Center B - FA - FAAM
When we do Actual Assessment Cycle (KSU5) system transfers the cost from A to B with FAME FA only not taking FAAM in CC B.
Substitution rule created in OKC9 would work for FI postings but does not work for the CO Assessments and in both CO and FI (Reconciliation) documents Functional Area from Sender Cost Center is populated in the receiver line item.
When the trace is activated on the rule it shows that the condition in the substitution rule is TRUE i.e. met. However system still does not carry out the substitution.
Any suggestions or work-around to achieve the required results are appreciate.
Sharad
Hello Sagar,
Yes, overhead can be calculated considering Costing lot size. For that need to use overhead tamplate. For more information check the below document.
http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-57681
Best regards,
Manish