Hi Mona,
It is not possible to upload for KBK6, Please look at the SAP Note: 1702363
It's better to develop ztransaction code.
Regards
Srinu
↧
Re: KBK6 Excel upload
↧
Re: COPA document is being created with no cost element
Hi Ravi,
Mapping just conditions to value field is not enough to generate a COPA document. Cost elements need to be mapped to PA transfer structure. What I am saying we didn't even create a cost element for the account which is creating the accounting document and system is still posting COPA document.
Thanks,
↧
↧
Re: Selection variant - authorization
thanks, it is helpful!
↧
Re: Difference between local and group currency while they are the same
Dear Madhu,
thanks for your clarification, can you provide me with the way to know which asset made the difference as i only see the financial entry which is the depreciation expense for equipment account and already a lot of assets assigned with this g/l account, the classification for the entry per cost and profit center only , i can't determined it by which asset.
Thanks and Best Regards,
Ahmed Samir
↧
Re: Difference between local and group currency while they are the same
Hi Ahmed,
You can execute S_ALR_87011963 - ... by Asset Number for book depreciation and group depreciation separately and then compare in excel sheet.
Best Regards,
Madhu
↧
↧
Re: Transfer PPV to COGS account
Hi Srini,
Actual Costing in Material Ledger will provide the required functionality.
Regards,
Szymon
↧
Re: Material ledger - values allocation to specific cost component
Hi Marco,
If this is the case, you can allocate cost directly to Material Code.
Info record for RM & BOM -SFG/FG......
Hope other alternative you could not allocate directly to material - as per the SAP standard system..
Regd,
Khan.
↧
Re: Transfer PPV to COGS account
Hi Srini,
Yes as per your requirement same we have done for our client (ML will provide completer solution)
Other Alternative we can do to transfer to COPA-
Scenario 1: Standard Price gets updated from a external system and posts a revaluation document
Stock Account Debit
Revaluation Account Balance Sheet A/c Cr
Scenario 2: Due to the standard price change we get PPV's during goods reciept
Stock Account Debit
GR/IR Credit
PPV Balance Sheet open item A/c Credit
why this is "B/S a/c for revaluation & PPV "will get credited - it should be PNL A/c....
Then those cost element -you can set up in OKB9- clicking to Profitability Segment- so this cost directly take to COPA segment value fields.
Regd,
Khan.
↧
Re: Transfer PPV to COGS account
Hi Srinivasa,
In scenario 1 & 2, you have to define the revaluation account & PPV clearing account as P&L account and this accounts should be created a cost element. Once the entries are posted to this account, you need to transfer to CO-PA based on sales.
Regards,
Mukthar
↧
↧
Re: KPSI Reset
Dear Ashley,
Using the reset should be no problem, however as the message KI720 mentions that
"This function is intended for a complete resetting of data in cases of
serious error. It is not necessary in normal processing, because
repeating a run will normally correct changes from the last run. Any
incorrect allocation therefore corrects itself."
So the use of a cost centre group for reset is not possible.
Regards,
Declan
↧
Re: KB24N - Reverse Activity Allocation -> looking for mass reversal
Hi Thomas
The BAPI BAPI_ACC_ACT_POSTINGS_REVERSE can be used for KB15N and KB21N and is suitable to handle multiple documents in once call (by filling the document numbers into table DOC_NO of the BAPI). Please also mind note #737917, section 4.
The OSS Note 385897 mention that Reversal posting of those documents
can be done either manually using KB24/KB24N transaction for individually
processing, or using bapi 'BAPI_ACC_ACT_POSTINGS_REVERSE'.
Regards,
Declan
↧
Re: KB24N - Reverse Activity Allocation -> looking for mass reversal
HI,
no, there is no transaction for the mass reversal of CO documents. Create an Abap based on Declan's information.
BR Christian
↧
Re: KE4S - COGS Breakup update Issue
Hi,
in CO-PA customizing (Controlling/Profitability Analysis/Master Data/Valualtion/Set up Valuation Using Material Cost Estimate) check the "Define Access to Standard Cost Estimates" entry(ies) that are relevant for you.
I guess the period indicator is set to "Current standard cost estimate acc. to entry in mat. master" so its always taking the actual released standard cost estimate even if you repost old billing docs. using KE4S
The option "Released standard cost estimate matching goods issue date" should solve your issue. Try in test environment first.
The mentioned CO-PA realignment (KEND) is not helpful as you can change characteristíc values in CE4* but NOT the COGS values posted.
BR Christian
↧
↧
Re: internal order settlement issue
Hi Declan,
Thank you for your kindly reply.
I checked OKOA, the description of CF type is "G/L account document".
Since the function area of the order and the cost center are different, order to cost center also generate FI document. So I think it should use SU type which defined in settlement profile. Another question, if order to cost center is internal settlement, which type it should use? Is this a default configuration?
Looking forward to your reply.
Thank you!
Stephanie
↧
Re: Report GR55 and KKAQ
Hi
Can you please paste screen of both to understand query better.
However for your understanding KKAQ only calculates WIP and do not post any entry in FI. Entries are passed when settlement is done (CO88 or KO88).
So primarily it seems that some of the orders are not settled hence you are getting this difference. Kindly check few orders in this light.
Regards
Rajneesh
↧
Re: Difference between KSB1 and FBL3N and KE24
Hi,
Can you please check the ex-rate type in COPA-settings & Company Code settings -should be the same as "M"....(Average rate)
& in OB08 check for Co Code Currency to Controlling area currency (Indirect & Direct rate should be the same....(Ex- USD - INR 50 (Direct) - INR -USD 50 (Indirect)....
if this varies then also it wont match the CO & FI reports. as suggested by vijay "KSB1-FBL3N"
Regd,
Khan.
↧
Re: transfer PCA for cogs
Hi,
No it will not-when you reclassify PCA it wont effect to COPA.
In order to effect COPA we have transfer cost in below ways .....
1. from SD Billing
2. Direct posting from FI/MM
3. PA -settlement of Order (variance settled)
4. COPA Assessment Cycle (From Cost to COPA Value field -ID cost transfer)
Once you do the reclassify PCA- from 1 to another you have to send -Cost through COPA Assement Cycle to......
Hope this will solve your issue.
Regd,
Khan.
↧
↧
Re: CoPa characteristic
Hi,
Add on to replied by Choi & Preeti the KEAO Characteristic assignment to Operating Concern will not generate TR- it will get activate -(this need to transport through -KE3I)
& rest - KEDR, KE4R, KE4I,KEDI....maintain...
Regd,
Khan.
↧
Re: internal order settlement issue
Hi Stephanie,
The document type "CF" is generated because of your order and cost centre have different functional areas. This document type you have defined in real time integration of FICO configuration. The other document type is you defined in settlement profile and this was posted with asset postings.
I think you are clear now. If you any queries please let me know.
Regards,
Mukthar
↧
Re: Difference between KSB1 and FBL3N and KE24
HI ,
Its looks like that some docuemnt in FBL3N doesn't have cost centreand that's did not create any Cost docuemnt . Can you Please sort Line iten of FBL3n Accounting to Cost centre or Filter the Line item without cost centre. You will find line item without cost cnter please analysis them and this will give you the difference
Many Thanks
↧