Valid cost estimate exists. I have checked.
↧
Re: Variance wrong interpretation
↧
Re: WIP and variance is not calculating
Hi
Your doubt is right.
Also check (if you have confirmed both) that actual rates exists. You can see in KSBT.
Rajneesh
↧
↧
Re: Moving Average Pricing would have Purchase Price Variance on Raw Material?
Can you send screen shots of migo..also see what transaction key is hitting to post your pur price diff in OBYC which will give you some light on this issue.
↧
Re: Moving Average Pricing would have Purchase Price Variance on Raw Material?
Hi,
Check the PO changes at item level in ME23N, some body might have changed the PO price after GRN done.
Regards,
Mukthar
↧
validation not allowing to book the actual cost(MIGO)
Hi Gurus,
i want book the cost particular wbs elements for particular gl's only.
Ex:Projecty Type is IP Wbs element 1 Gl's 200001,200005,400001 and 400005.
Project Type is CO Wbs element 2 Gl's 200010,200015,400010 and 400015
Here i want to book the cost respect wbs elements and respect gl's only. if i book other wbs elements gl's it has to throw error..below the condition i have maintained.
I have wrote validation in Cost accounting for line item
1. Prerequisite is PRPS-PRART = 'IP'
2.Check is COBL-SAKNR IN SET_IP OR COBL-HKONT IN SET_IP...
3.Message is Assign Proper WBS element.
Then i have maintained Stock GL's and Inventory GL's in GS01.
Then i have activated validation in OKC7.
Based on the above conditions i have created PO it's allowing to book the cost.
Then i want to create MIGO it's not allowing to book the cost, it's throwing error message assign proper wbs element.
please suggest.....
↧
↧
Re: WIP and variance is not calculating
here is my kSBT screenshot. i have not confirmed the price.
↧
Re: Moving Average Pricing would have Purchase Price Variance on Raw Material?
This is the GRN and PO amount
This is the amount shown in inventory
This is the entry
Which has the purchase price variance
↧
Re: profit cetner subsituation
closing this thread
↧
How to use DME File...
Hi Gurus,
I am working on Electronic Bank statement part and but facing one issue. Bank is not able to provide SAP relevant format so we are doing Manual bank statement.
Now the question is uploading data in FF67 which is tedious task because user has around 400 transaction each month in Bank statement. I am not finding any relevant BAPI which will solve this issue.
User has suggested that create a DMEE mapping and utilise transaction S_PL0_09000467 - covert with DME Engine to upload statement.
My query is I have not worked on DME till now. What is the purpose of DME and how I can use it for the uploading of bank statement in FF67.
Regards,
Gaurav
↧
↧
Re: change settlement profile of sales document
Thanks for replying Vaibhav
But I haven't run VA88 in production mode yet , so no need for the reversal.
The problem is that , all the SO I created before have the wrong settlement profile , even if I changed the configuration.
I found that after I create a SO , settlement profile has already been written in COBRA table , does anyone know if I can change this?
↧
Re: KA03: Cost element category F4 not working
Hi Saba,
Please check the entries in table DD07T, for domain KATYP and your log on language.
Regards,
Szymon
↧
Re: CKMLAVR_SIM BADI
Hi Mona,
I don't know the details of the code.
I suggest you debbug it.
Regards,
Szymon
↧
Re: CO Planning on KATYP = 21 not possible ?
Hi..
It is impossible to perform planning using cost elements with Cost element category 21.
Cost elements with Cost element category 21 are used to settle plan or actual data from order to other cost object like cost center.
↧
↧
Valuation type characteristic in CO-PA
Dear experts,
We faced the error during KE27 'No valuation exists for material XXXXXX'
Message no. MLCCS030
Diagnosis
There is no valuation (for instance periodic unit price or cost component split).
This error is happened because we have material which is activate split valuation.
but we not yet create valuation type as characteristic in CO-PA.
Current design does not implement SD module,however, businesss requires
to have valuation type split for some material types. Cost of goods
sold is configured to transfer to CO-PA from FI/MM transfer structure.
COGS can be transfer properly without error, Only when we do KE27 to transfer actual cost from ML that we get error as above.
As per OSS note no. 111232 - INFO: Valuation for materials valuated
separately, valuation type (BWTAR) can be added to CO-PA characteristic
and system will derive from sales order item. Unfortunately, this seems
inapplicable for our current scope with no SD in place.
Is there any possibility to create characteristic valuation type which
is not depend on source table VBAP (sales order) to derive valuation type to CO-PA characteristic during GI for sale?
Thank you very much.
↧
Re: KA03: Cost element category F4 not working
Hello Szymon,
I see all the 16 entries in this table that the drop down for Cost element category shows me.
Its just that dear F4 does not "detect" these properly in KA03 
Thanks a lot !
saba.
↧
Re: Internal Order settlement
Hi,
Ya I tried and even performed the settlement of I/O to the same.
↧
Re: Valuation type characteristic in CO-PA
Hi..
I think that you can use user-exit “EXIT_SAPLKEII_002” to solve your problem.
for example :
LOOP AT t_accit INTO is_accit WHERE hkont EQ 'xxxxxxxxx' .
READ TABLE t_item INTO is_item WITH KEY belnr = is_accit-belnr
paobjnr = is_accit-paobjnr
vrgar = 'B'.
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
wrk_index = sy-tabix.
t_item-wwxxx = t_accit-BWTAR. "Valuation type
MODIFY t_item FROM is_item INDEX wrk_index
TRANSPORTING
wwxxx .
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
↧
↧
Re: COPA - VPRS and EK02
Hi Upendra,
In MTO Material will be valuated in 3 Ways.
1. Sales order cost estimate : If you perform the sales order cost estimate and mark the cost estimate , you can give automatic marking in Requirement class. If do not mention automatic marking option then u have do manually in Va02/CK51N.
2. Standard cost estimate from the material master Costing 2 Tab.
System will pick std cost from material master if you done related setting in Requiremetn class.
3. Production order/Process Order.
If the above 2 Requirements are not met then sytem will pic the plan price from the production order/Process order valuate the material.
In your case it seems system is considering the price from process order.
The variance is plan cost and actual cost of the process order.
Regards,
Ram
↧
Re: change settlement profile of sales document
Thanks Nani
What you said is how to config settlement profile , which I make a mistake and then correct it .
Here comes the problem,the settlement profile won't be changed automatically in SO created before , even if I changed the configuration .
So I need to change not just the config , but also the SO.But I cannot find a place to change the SO.
↧
Re: Material Cost can not be updated.
Hi
In material master costing 2 view we have two different fields i.e. Planned price (LPLPR) and Standard price (STPRS). Planned price field is updated with the cost calculated during standard cost estimate (CK11N/CK40N) and at the same time standard price field is also updated with the same cost.
Whereas standard price field can also be updated through other ways (MR21). But if you give price through MR21 it can not be updated to planned price field. This is the reason when you do CKR1 (re-organization of cost) system only reorganizes planned price field and price at standard price field remains the same. This is because all material movements happen in system with standard price field.
This was a general understanding on these two fields where you are stuck up. Now coming to your today's Q1 : If you have stock in the material and you don't give any price with CK40N/CK11N or MR21 then the stock will be valuated with ZERO price hence fetching value.
Q2: CK11N is done with quantity structure means using BOM and Routings. Till these two are not changed either in terms of quantity or price, system will calculate same standard price (in your case 119000), even you do it 100 times. And as I said in above paras the same price will be updated in standard price field also hence 200 can not remain there.
Regards
Rajneesh Saxena
↧