Hi Guru
I am trying to understand how data flow from SAP FI -> SAP CO..
Any document or link or some guidance will be helpful..
One quick question -> If i develop a bw report coming from PCA , will it cover all expenses for that fiscal period ?
Thank you..
Hi All
Would like to know if we have 50 Assessment cycles, and we want to schedule all the 50 cycles in single execution how to do that.
In KSU5 screen we have 16 cycle options, but how to add more than 16 and run it in background ?
Aravind
Hi
Forum rules says that you should ask one query per thread.
Hence giving respect to rules I am replying your first question that how data flows from FI to CO.
It is the primary cost element in CO which plays as bridge between FI and CO. Usually each expense and revenue GL in FI is created as primary cost element in CO so as to reach these figures in CO module for further analysis.
At the time of financial posting in FI system automatically transfers figures to CO using these cost elements.
Hope this gives you some help.
Regards
Rajneesh Saxena
Hi Praveen,
Please share a screen shot of the document.
Regards,
Mukthar
Hi,
I do not think it wont impact to other co.codes, if you use reverse document type for all your co.codes.
Regards,
Mukthar
Hi
Relevent GL in FI which you want to flow in CO are created as cost element. This linkage helps to flow FI to CO. Whenever any FI entry is posted in that GL it automatically flows to CO based on that assignment.
Rgds
Akhil
Hi Expert,
we are doing FI-CO Reconciliation but FI Document is not generating. first we are run the KSV5. and KAL1 and KALC. After seeing in KSB5 only CO Document is generated.Kindly find the attachment.
Note : New GL is not using
Kindly share the yours input.
Regards
Sarvottam
Hi Praveen,
You can find the details in Tables ""BSE_CLR""
Hi,
1) for p&l,
cogm = (800) - dr fg cr cogm
consumption = 1000 - cr raw dr consumption
chg in wip = 200 - cr wip bs dr chg in wip pl
cogs = 700
cost of material = (100) this is credit
2) for bs,
fg = 100 this is debit
my question
1 above on debit credit correct?
2 what do you mean cost of material match with fg stock?
thanks
hello,
we are having an issue with internal order results analysis. This might not be the correct forum but wanted to see if anyone from CRM had faced similar issue. Below is the business process:
1) create warranty contract in SAP CRM with for example 5 year term
2) this triggers an internal order to which revenues can be posted.
3) also triggers a debit memo request (dmr) in which the line item is assigned to internal order above.
4) customer pays upfront and dmr is billed. Full revenue is recognized upfront.
5) there are not costs charged to the internal order and only revenues.
we want to amortize the revenue over 60 months (5 years) in equal amounts to a deferred revenue account through results analysis of IO. Toward this SAP has recommended to create ABGMNG skf and use RA method 05 quantity based POC method. We did the configuration but the Results analysis does not calculate the monthly amount to be posted to revenue and deferred revenue account. We can see that the SKF is splitting the period into percentages at the table level (table COAR) for POC but for some reason RA is not able to read this data.
SAP suggests the notes below but the release that we are using is far ahead and I see they are not applicable to us and I do not see they are not release independent.
Please let me know if anyone has faced this issue and any help in resolving would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Raj
Why you haven't share the error message number ? Is there any special reason ?
Dear Sapask,
Can you please be more clear with your question.
But from what I understood, you need to know how COGS and COGM reported.
Both are represented in P&L account. COGS represents debit for sales of Finished goods, where as COGM represents all production expenses debited. That is basically inventorying cost of production.
Hopefully this is clear.
Naman
Please see the error message.. sorry for not including in my previous post.
Hi Nikki
You need not to define any equivalent number if you do not want to factorized your cost to more than one activity for same cost center, Generally one to one relation this is not required..see the example
CCtr..XXX1 Activity YYY1
KP26 Activity XXX1 qty 4800 hrs dis..1
KP06 Act YYY1 CE 9999 Fix Value 4800 V.Value 9600 dis 1
So act rate... F/rate= 4800/4800 V/rate 9600/4800 total 14600/4800
So no need of equivalent number
But if you have more than one activity you can distribute fixed cost based on equivalent ratio...but rarely used
Thanks Mukthar, but I would like to perform a solution that only applies for the specific co. code.
Does anyone know if there is some User Exit for Numbering?
Regards,
Hi,
The cost element validity period from 01.01.2014 to 31.12.2014 Now i want to extend this cost element validity period.
And when i extend the validity period from 01.01.2014 to 31.12.2015 i am facing this error like " New analysis period must not exceed maximum period limit"
Please help me to fix this error and find the error screen for reference.
Regards,
Babu
Hi Babu
You can't extend validity period by new analysis period...
Just go to KA01 again and put validity period from 01.01.2015 To 31.12.2015 and save...
Dears
We use (1) expense GL for forex loss posting and (2) Revenue GL for Gain posting.
I have given the Cost Centre for Expense GL in OKB9 assignment.
But I do not know what should be maintained for Revenue GL for the forex automatic posting.
We cannot give Cost Centre, as it is revenue, right ?
Since the revenue GL is a cost element, it would ask for Cost object assignment, right ?
What is the normal practice in this case ? Please give your advice.
The OSS note 418445 - Error message KD302 seems unjustified - splitting by equi.noexplains the reason and solution.
Hi Nikki
Actually in my opinion Forex loss/gain is not consider a cost expenses and purely a financial element and not required to create any CE....
It's effect is directly posted to P&L a/c