Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP ERP Financials - Controlling
Viewing all 8508 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Posting cost line item

$
0
0

Hi Siahaan,

 

As Maintenance order already settled and you would like  to do changes at the Maintenance order  level...Possible steps if you are using classic GL

 

Step 1 : Reverse the settlement

Step 2: Repost costs KB11N- with sender and receiver with same order but give old and new cost element

Step3 : Proceed with settlement

 

Regards,

Sekhar T


Re: Confirmation of activity type in Process order -Impact in FI.

$
0
0

Hi Kamal,

 

Thanks

 

Can you please clarify on 2nd point  by providing an example     ----where we are booking in FI.. .When we do the confirmation for a acitvity type price maintained in KP26 will get update...We have no where booked this expenditure. 

 

Please provide an example  to understand better..Thanks a lot,

Re: COPA and GL not matching

$
0
0

To find out delta between FI & COPA ,  use report KSB1 or S_ALR_87013625 and drill down to find missing COPA segment can be found.

Re: KALC Issue

$
0
0

Hi Jason,

 

What you said is right when new gl is activated.

But in my case new gl is not activated and hence we are using t-code KALC and the same does't show any transaction after executing.

 

 

Regards,

Prasad

Re: Cost Production order Error. No posting string can be determined in table T156SC

$
0
0

Hi all,

 

Today I had the same problem and I got to fix it.

 

My error was due to coproducts. In my BOM I have some coproducts but they are not marked as coproduct. Only they have negative quantity.

 

For these coproducts, the system was set up with movement 101, as well as GR for PP order. This is the reason for the error.

 

It’s necessary to divide into two different movements: one for GI (101) and one for coproducts (531). To do that, use OPKA transaction.

 

Regards,

Diego

COPA0004 Change in Exch.rate type

$
0
0

Hi,

 

 

We’ve a costing based CO-PA in our instance which is shared by other co.codes in our environment. Now, with new business requirement, we
may have to use a separate exchange rate type for CO-PA than M. We’re trying to achieve this with exit COPA0004. We’ve also read the note 429517 on Currency translation billing document -> CO-PA to understand the value flow to COPA.

 

 

Please note that we don’t want to affect current exch.rate settings of existing co.codes which is ‘M’. However, for a new co.code we want
to move values to COPA with ‘P’ exchange rate.  

 

Question-

 

 

Is it possible to achieve it through user exit COPA0004 to default exchange rate in COPA based on company code? Or is it a blanket change
for all co.codes if we change the rate from ‘M’ to ‘P’. 

 

We’re evaluating the solution before implementing in system.  

 

Thanks,

 

Nirav

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Re: COPA0004 Change in Exch.rate type

Re: Confirmation of activity type in Process order -Impact in FI.

$
0
0

Hi Daya

 

1. You can calculate activity price for plan in KSPI and for actual KSII for respective CCtr and activity type...but some times people manually update price at KP26 directly which in my opinion is not right way because price is either more or less than the real calculation in KSPI and KSII...

 

2. However in your case price is directly updated in KP26 against activity type..when confirmation is done in order this rate * activity qty is your value posted in order level and at the same time respective CCtr is also credited by this amount which you can see in CCtr report

 

   Example:  CCtr  XXXX01

 

                   Activity type 999999

 

                   Sec cost Element for activity type 999999 (43 cat)

 

    Suppose you have booked FI entries for some expenses like Salary in F-02/FB50...against CCtr XXXX01   So your CCtr XXXX01 is debited by Salary amount and this amount will be absorbed in product through activity for which you need  activity price and confirmation.

 

    FI entry is booked your expense in GL a/c Salary and same time debited your CCtr through CE salary....Now when you charging this expense in product through prod order you are doing it through confirmation of activity qty which in turn calculating value by taking price from KP26 and qty from confirmation.

 

Kamal


Re: Product costing Scenario

$
0
0

Hi

 

 

In my view you require domain knowledge support from client more than technical support from consultants because all your questions are basically process mapping ...so take help from cost people from client side.

 

 

kamal

Re: COPA

$
0
0

Hello Anish,

Can you explain your problem in details?

If it is possible, can you give one example?

 

Best regards,

Ronghua Fan

Re: Confirmation of activity type in Process order -Impact in FI.

$
0
0

Hi Kamal,

 

Thanks a lot.was really help full,  Please confirm on below points given based on my understanding for the example given by you.

 

1) Manually updation of value in KP26 is wrong, Hence cost splitting would be the better one to get the actual cost,  on executing KSII  the value in KP26 is overwriten by the cost center values to activity type...please confirm is this understanding correct.

 

But.. even to run cost spliiting we need to maninatin the value in KP26 for activity type with respect to cost center else we receive an error...Please confirm on this.

 

Also..Please clarify what happens while we run KSII, how is it different from KSS2.?

 

Thanks.


Re: Transfer Pricing Within same Plant but different Profit centres

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

Any update on this issue? Your suggestion will be highly appreciated

 

Regards,

Parijat Mukherjee

Re: Confirmation of activity type in Process order -Impact in FI.

$
0
0

hi Daya

 

   If any answer is helpful mark it helpful....

 

   1. I am telling manual price update in KP26 is wrong but not correct approach...

 

   2. KSPI will calculate plan price as per planning in KP06 and update in KP26

 

   3. KSII will calculate actual price as per expenses booked in CCtrs and help to revaluate activity value in Orders from plan price to actual price when you execute revaluation of orders

 

   4. Splitting is required if you have more than one activity in any CCtr to split secondary CE costs to activity level

 

 

  Kamal

Re: Production order cost by material group

$
0
0

Hello,

 

CO-PC-IS report should be available.

Summarization is possible on material group.

 

Best Regards,

Owen

No data exists for the analysis object

$
0
0


Hi Experts,

 

We have configured new process of Solar in product costing.

 

We do not have any material used in this. We do not have BOM. We have maintained activity type rates in KP26. We have successfully created Product Cost Collector for Material/Plant combination. When we are checking Product cost collector Header Tab, Cost button, we get message '

No data exists for the analysis object'

 

I do not understand what this message exactly means. Till yet no posting have been done in this new material. Is this the reason for getting this message. Once MFBF is done, will this error will go away or anything else to be done.

 

Please guide.

Regards

Zunaid.


CK11N Costing of material with special procurement key 30 ( subcontracting )

$
0
0

Hello,

 

I am having a scenario where in I have a material X which I procure through subcontracting (procurement type F and special procurement 30 in MRP2).

 

I have created a recursive BOM for material where in the base quantity and the component quantity is 100 units. (only one component X in the BOM).

 

But, while I am tryinig to run CK11N costing for this material, it is giving me the below warning and error.

I am using costing variant PP01.

 

CK723Costing of cycle 00001 does not converge
CK740Material X in plant Y belongs to cycle 00001 costed with errors

 

I have followed the below thread and could resolve the error by reducing the component quantity in the recursive BOM from 100 to 80 (ratio less than 0.95 as mentioned in the thread).

 

Costing of Recursive Structures - Product Cost Planning (CO-PC-PCP) - SAP Library

 

But, my requirement is different. I purchase 100 units of X from a vendor, send it to a subcontractor for labelling purpose, and again I purchase back 100 units of X.

 

So, what we did is we had maintained special procurement costing key = 20 under costing tab of material master, after which CK11N run is fine.

 

Please let me know how can I configure as per my requirement by only giving speical procurement = 30 in MPR2 tab and special procurement costing = blank in costing tab.

Also, what will be the impact on costing with speical procurement = 30 (subcontracting) in MPR2 tab and special procurement costing = 20 (External procurement)

 

P.S - I am not from procurement dept.

         I have already searched forums but couldnt get any help to configure the scenario as per my requirement above.

Re: CK11N Costing of material with special procurement key 30 ( subcontracting )

Re: Transfer Pricing Within same Plant but different Profit centres

$
0
0

Hi, yes you can do it.

Ofcause you need to assign these two materials to different PCs.

Also you need to use 2 different valuation (in FI and CO, CO-ML), Legal and PC. In PC valuation you have values with internal margin for internal reporting and in legal you have without it for external reporting purpouse.

Be aware that margin added to standard and not actual price.

 

you could switch off transffer price in cmod PCASELEK/EXIT_SAPLPCRW_003

 

Also you could read some info if you're not activated transfer prices and want additional lines to be generated during posting between PCs (note 937872  )

 


Re: S_ALR_87013019 -List: Budget/Actual/Commitments Report Error

Re: No data exists for the analysis object

$
0
0

Hi

 

COST button gives you data for the costs booked for this pcc.

 

After MFBF you will get data there.

 

One more thing, if you have multiple versions, please check for all versions.

 

Rajneesh

Viewing all 8508 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>