Hi
Program that runs behind CON2 is SAPLKAZB which deal with revaluation of prod/process orders. Whereas RKAZCON2 delas with revaluation of prod orders and product cost collectors. Both serves the same purpose as con2 serves.
This selects all orders and not only with status 'Teco or Dlv'.
Rajneesh
Hi Rajneesh.
Thanks for your replay. when i run con2 ,and check background processing,ask for job name, what i should input for job name ? i should create a job in sm36 and put that name here ?
regards
Mahtab
Hi Mr. Mukthar & Aleksey
I found old created Substitution step in OK17 created by our Consultant as below
and the newly created by me as below
is there any difference or conflict would happen between both of them
Regards
Mahmoud EL Nady
Hello friends,
First i want to thank all your support. I have solved the issue. As i said, at plant 5030 i have a current planned price. So at KEPC i created a rule using plant 5030 as plant used for reading cost estimate and that solved the issue.
Hi Mahmoud,
Yes, it will conflict it. Because in the old substitution if the GL account is exist in the set, then the GL has replaced with the substitution GL. So first check the set in GS02 and remove the GL which has defined in the new substitution prerequisite condition.
Regards,
Mukthar
Hi Mukthar
Thanks for you reply.. i checked GS02 for COFI_SUBSTITUTION_OH i found that it's not containing any GL , except secondary cost element not used by me.. i believe now as per your valuable advise that it will not conflict with my new created substitution .
Regards
Mahmoud EL Nady
Hi Mhamoud,
Yes, it will not reflect.
Regards,
Mukthar
Dear Kamal,
thanks for your reply I just want to know how to deal with revaluation account in co and what is the best way and the right cost element category or i have to delete the cost element.
thanks
Nassar
Hi
Can anyone explain how for activity allocation the planned price is calculated automatically by system, Can anyone explain if any configuration is required.
Hi,
1. First you have to maintain the price indicator as 3 in the activity type master
2.You have to plan activity type output for each of the combination of cost center/activity type in KP26
3. Later you have to plan costs for the cost center/activity type in KP06
4. After done the above, then you have to run KSPI. Then system will calculate the price based on costs/its output.
Regards,
Mukthar
Hi Shoaib,
Thanks for update.
Regards
Amit
Hi All,
Our system is connected with Taxware system via RFC. Entries get always stuck in SMQ1 with system fail.
We need to reactivate the queue in SMQ1 all the time to clear entries. Is there any way to solve this problem?
Please advise
Thanks in advance
Regards
Amit
Hi,
I am trying to find a way to ensure that settlement of cost from a sender to a receiver is done based on each line item in the sender.
Currently if I have $20 in cost element 7000, and another $30 in the same cost element (i.e.) 7000. The settlement in the receiver shows $50 in cost element 7000.
Is it possible to see $20 and $30 as separate line items in the receiver instead of a lump sum of $50.
Your response will be highly appreciated.
Dear All,
We have a critical question regarding the suitable setting for a Controlling company Code.
Let me explain the case: Our current controlling structure (already in Production) is grouped around a unique Controlling Company code running in EURO, with this particular setting:
Assignment control:
CoCd--->CO Area= Cross-company-code cost accounting
Currency Setting:
Currency type=20
Currency= EUR
Diff. CCode Currency is flagged
Up to now, all the Financial company codes attached under this Controlling Company Code setting, run in EURO, so there are no problems to see the accounting and cost information (profitability CO-PA and costing CO-PC), in EURO currency, obviously.
However, now we are going to attach a new Financial Company running in GBP, and it will work with a double currency: GBP as the company currency, and EUR as grouping currency.
Now, with the current CO setting I have told you before:
Will I be able to view the controlling information in GBP when limiting the view only to this new Financial Company (which runs in GBP)?
By extension, will I be able to view the controlling information in EUR when I want to see the aggregated costing & profitability information of all the companies, including of course the Financial company code running in GBP?
In the end, what I want to know is if I will be able to see the costing information in GBP and EUR, depending on what I ask for, and taking into consideration the current setting of my Controlling Company code. If not, would it be possible to change my Current type setting from '20' to '30' or better not to change this?
A good answer to this question would be of great help and would boost our project implementation, as well as very good rewarded.
Many thanks in advance.
Hi Kamal,
thank you for explanation, i thought so.... the roll up in cost component is mandatory when component is cost of goods manufactured or is for inventory valuation. I need roll up, but cost component split want to see for concrete level, so SFG 612400 as lower material in cost component 30, raw material 10. Not roll up in original source.
thanks Gustav
Hi Sweta
Basic concept of profit center is to design for reporting and any change may only hit your reports not any financial entry...so In my opinion not a worried situation...
1. Make/ decide a cut off date , better from start of any period
2. Create new profit center as required under proper hierarchy
3. Before cut off date, better at last day transfer all data from wrong PC to correct one
4. Also see any open orders related to old PC is pending..either make them correct or cancelled
Kamal
it does not matter where, because it is the same everywhere, Kamal is right. I understand this concept, but i need another view of CCS. I don´t know whether it is possible. If not in stadnadard, how in non-standard?
Gustav
Hi Gustov
As I explained Itemization is one way of seeing the cost where you can see original source wise and CCS view is another way of seeing the cost basically roll up view and also at CE level. If you go in depth...
1. In itemization main source we assign in BOM, Routing, Costing Sheet, Additive cost etc are being shown at different actegory
2.In CCS all above source are broken to CE assign to CCS attributes...so one is header and another is line items
kamal
This G/L is itself created as Cost element and there exists no order assigned in the master data of this cost element as well.Pl. advise further
Well Kamal, i understand.
Is there in SAP a report where i see FERT material (the highest) with all cost element from all levels of BOM? Do you have experience with userexit in CK11N - cost - user exit display - cost report 1-3?
Thanks a lot, Gustav