Hi,
Please check if the validity dates 1990-2999 is for the affected cost center in KS03.
Regards,
Sean
↧
Re: Message no KI222 Cost center doesn’t exist on date
↧
Re: GRN not getting posted with Sale Order costing value
Hi Suresh,
Sales order cost estimate should have higher priority than production order cost estimate. This is mentioned in SAP note 520000.
One point I can think about is that the Sales order cost estimate should have status VO(marked without error) before the first GRN or order settlement. Please check if this is the case.
Once GRN is done, the price is fixed and can only be changed by MR21.
Regards,
Sean
↧
↧
Archiving of CO-objects - transaction SARA
Hello,
we use the new G/L and we want to archive CO-data.
I have some questions here:
a) concerning archiving object COPA1_xxxx (costing based copa, xxxx is the operating concern):
What does the system archive under this object.
b) COPA2_xxxx refers to the account-based copa. We do not use the account-based copa.
Is it correct that I need not archive anything here because we do not use it? I assume I am right.
c) CO_TOTL_AO is the object for CO Totals Records for Reconciliation Objects.
Does it refer to environments which go for the classic G/L and not for the new G/L?
I also ran the reports RARCCOA1 and -2 but these programs only refer to CO-objects and not to CO-PA.
Are there also transactions which help analyse the CO-PA objects for archiving?
Thanks a lot for any input.
Thomas
↧
Re: detailed authority-check for TA KA03, KAH3
Hi Arthur,
sorry, but i have no solution. In certain circumstances this will help you: 459864 - Group maintenance: Authorization G_800S_GS
regards
Henning
↧
Re: AP report with change in Payment block status
Hi,
Check in the program "RFIDNLWKA1", it will give you the changed payment block information.
Regards,
Ravi
↧
↧
Re: Network Activiy in KSU1
Hello GKP,
This has been documented in SAP note below:
1920754 - Network can not be used as receiver in actual assessment cycle
The reason is like:
It is not possible to use network as receiver in assessment. This isn't supported from technical view. Because assessment can only process the objects which have only one field, but network needs two fields.
best regards,
Jason
↧
Re: Network Activiy in KSU1
Dear,
Are you using any specific cost center for those networks exclusively?If so you can assign those cost centers on behalf of those network activities with separate segment name for your assessment cycle.
Kindly refer SAP Note: 1920754 - Network cannot be used as receiver in actual assessment cycle.
Regards,
Pardhu.
↧
Valuation Variant strategy not working Correctly
Dear All,
Need your help resolving this issue.
I had a Z valuation variant which had only one strategy
1. Valuation price according to price control in material master (7)
When I run CU50 the cost is determined based on the MVG or standard price maintained in the material master.
I have changed the same valuation variant:
1. Valuation price according to price control in material master (7)
2. Price from Purchase info record (L)
Sub strategy
1. Net Purchase order price (7)
When I run CU50 for the same material I would expect the MVG or standard price to be shown in CU50 but it picks the purchase info record price which I have maintained for variant pricing.
What I would want to achieve is if I dont have price maintained in material master then I need to pick PIR price otherwise pick only price from material master.
Any suggestions
↧
Re: AP report with change in Payment block status
Hello,
I think the question is not how the change payment method/payment block but how to monitor such changes as part of internal control procedure.
Standard reports RFBABL00 (transaction code S_ALR_87012293 display documents changes. This report include extensive option for selecting your data (on the selection screen) as well as regarding the fields that are displayed (can be configured in IMG: Financial Accounting/Financial Accounting Global Settings/Document/Document).
Good luck.
Thomas
↧
↧
Change origin table for the COPA characterstic
Hi,
Kindly suggest is there any way we can change the origin table for COPA characteristic created through table reference
Thanks.
↧
Business Area validation for particular Company Code
Hello experts,
I am dealing with following task: it is required to prepare validation or BTE to check whether selected business area belongs to the specified company code. Basically, we have several company codes, and for each several business areas can be used, like this:
| Company Code | Business Area |
|---|---|
| AT10 | 1000,2000 |
| AT20 | 2000,3000 |
| DE10 | 1000 |
| DE20 | 3000 |
| CZ10 | 4000 |
Could you point me to the right direction? I was trying with simple validation (under GGB0), but I am not sure what is the scope of business area (where it can be used in the whole SAP system). Also, find out BTE, but don't know that this is the best solution.
Maybe there is another solution - is it possible to define business area for particular company code?
Thanks in advance
↧
Re: Valuation Variant strategy not working Correctly
Hi Vasanth
First you delink the valuation variant from plant and save...then change the valuation variant and assign it again and save...
Kamal
↧
Activate distribution of Consumption Differences-CKMDUVMAT
Hi All,
We are activating ML and we would like to distribute physical inventory differences to materials only using CKMDUVMAT. Still do we need to update plant and storage location combination in configuration or for material distribution this configuration is not required?
Thanks,
Anusha
↧
↧
CKMLCP-Purchase price variance allocation in Actual costing
Hi All,
We are using ML and If any manual JV (FB50) posted to purchase price variance account using material number/plant combination. Are these postings are allocated in single and multi-level price determinations? Only automatically generated purchase price variance from MM/PUR are allocated in single and multi-level price determinations.
Thanks,
Anusha
↧
Re: Activate distribution of Consumption Differences-CKMDUVMAT
Hi
I think it is required because if same mat is lying at diff plant/location how system will post the diff at various plant/location..
kamal
↧
Re: Business Area validation for particular Company Code
Thank you, I will definitely implement this solution 
Have a good one!
Cheers!
↧
Re: Message no KI222 Cost center doesn’t exist on date
Thank you Pardhu, I was mistaking in KP26 after fixing that parameters it worked fine.
↧
↧
Re: Business Area validation for particular Company Code
You are welcome.
May I ask you to mark one of my answer as "correct" then?
Thanks and regards
Th.
↧
Re: CKMLCP-Purchase price variance allocation in Actual costing
Hi...
If your material which occurs purchase price variance have price control ‘S’ and price determination ‘3’, Purchase price variance will be allocated in single and multi-level price determinations through material ledger closing job.
↧
Re: CKMLCP-Purchase price variance allocation in Actual costing
Hi Anushra. FB50 post with refference to a material dont create price diff relevant to ML (i mean records in table MLIT)
If you want to credit / debit material, use MR22. Also, If you have a Purchase Order, you can debit/credit the material with MIRO (create a post PRD / KBS). Both methods are relevant to the ML close.
Arturo.
↧