Hi Venkat,
Please refer the following thread Ajay Maheshwari SAP Trainer sir give detailed answer for this
Use of Costing Variant Actual (PPP3) in Product... | SCN
and also refer this following thread
Difference between preliminary cost estimate an... | SCN
Regards
Prasad
Dear,
Preliminary cost estimate is used in repetitive manufacturing area where in make to stock concept.System uses this preliminary cost estimate based on production versions.
Standard cost estimate is used to determine a cost estimate for a material at the begining of a period an dit is valid for that particular period.And we should not change the standard cost in that period so that the cost estimate is not changed and remains constant during the production setup for that period.Standard cost is not linked to production versions.
Please read the concept of standard cost estimate: Basics of SAP Standard Cost estimate- Understanding the flow of cost settings-Part 1
and Part -2 http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-49167
Regards,
Pardhu
Hi john,
Are you trying load the cost of middle agent and bank guarantee cost on imported material ?
If yes then you can use additive cost concept
You need to change the configuration Costing variant (OKKN)
here make setting in additive cost tab
then maintain g/l with primary cost element assign to OKTZ
then create additive cost through CK74 here you add cost as you said
After this run CK11N for the material.This standard costing run then take the cost for that imported material.
Note: If Material ledger is active then you should check the impact of it before making any changes.
Regards
Prasad
Hi
I don't want to user additive cost functionality.
We have ML activated
Hi,
Good evening.
I have one query w.r.t assignment no. field population with sort key 014.
We have got Balance sheet account - 152070 Goods Rcpt/Invoice Rcpt Clearing - Cenvat with sort key - 014 - Purchase order Numb.
When posting happens to this GL during J1IEX, system properly populates the Assignment column (ZUONR) with value of only corresponding underlying Purchase Order No. Accounting document for part II posting shows GL 152070 with assignment column having only PO Num.
But for same transaction when vendor bill is posted through MIRO, system populates the Assignment column (ZUONR) with value of corresponding underlying Purchase Order No.concatenated with Line Item no. Accounting document for MIRO posting shows GL 152070 having PO Num and PO line item concatenated and stored in Assignment column.
OB16 shows Field1 as EBELN for sort key 014.
Also note that, till mid august'15, we didnot face any issue. But we upgraded to SP level patch 25 on 16/08/15. After that the problem started occuring.
Kindly advice.
I also read 'Sort Key Functionalities ' written by Mr. G. Ajit Kumar which gave a very good insight into usage of sort key. But could not find out the reason for above mentioned issue.
Table TZUN shows Sort key 014 has got field Name1 with value EBELN and field Name2 as EBELP. Why it is so?
Pl. revert as automatic clearing is not happening andusers are facing difficulty in manual clearing.
Regards
Ratna Palit
Sort Key 014 concatenates EBELN & EBELP into ZUONR. So MIRO works fine.
Maybe the issue is caused by localized trx J1IEX. There is a J1IEX related note http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1769518
Maybe will be helpful.
Hi Mira,
I can not implement the OSS NOTE 868390 as Implementation Status says " Can not be implemented". I am using 617 release.
Hi FI Guru,
We need to set up the program RKO7KO8G as a batch job run on the last day of each month when Finance performs the monthly closing except it falls on weekend or holiday when we need to move it the 1st possible day.
As the closing date is rolling instead of a fixed date, how can schedule the batch job on a rolling date?
In SM36 (Define a job), I can specify a start date and time and halt it on weekend and holiday.
But can we move it ahead to the best possible workday instead?
Please kindly help.
Thank you,
Sally
Hi Experts,
Any help on this...
HI,
U need to maintained this in KE4I transaction code new condition type to value field.
Hi Reddyr,
In KSU3 Please check receivers cost center percent in receiver tracing factor tab of your assessment cycle
Here you may be given 50% as system only update half of the amount debited.
Regards,
Prasad
Dear Michael,
Thanks for your reply.
I have checked the note 1769518 as suggested by you.
It says -
"The Purchase order number and Line item in the assignment field(ZUONR) in Cenvat clearing G/L account using the 014 sort key is not populated in MIRO(Invoice verification). But same gets
populated correctly in the transaction J1IEX and in MIGO. Hence clearing doesn't happen
automatically through transaction F.13."
But in our case, it is happening exactly opposite. EBELN and EBELP get concatenated into ZUONR during MIRO. But during J1IEX only EBELN is stored in ZUONR.
We are in release ECC 6.0 with SAP_APPL component at SP level - 25 and this note is valid for SAP_APPL SP level 24 (SAPKH60024). Hence we presume that all correction instructions pertaining to this note and manual activities are already available in our system.
We are checking these details now with the help of an abaper.
Since the scenario narrated in this note is opposite toissue we are facing, will there be any other note supporting our scenario i.e. case where EBELN and EBELP get concatenated into ZUONR during MIRO. But during J1IEX only EBELN is stored in ZUONR and hence auto clearing of Cenvat is not happening.
I would appreciate if you can guide us in this regard.
Regards
Ratna Palit
We have maintain the 100% the problem happen only this OCT month for only this CC .reminining CC they is a no problem for that period.
Hi
I want use the condition type origin group functionality can i
hi
Yes you should and also see following links for the same
https://scn.sap.com/thread/1840553
Condition type - actual cost component strecture | SCN
Regards
Prasad
Hi Bhaskar
I checked the S_ALR_87099930 report. However the figures are coming only in the costing results field. When I check the cost component details in the report, it does not show any figures. Is it a bug or is there any setting which needs to be done to get the figures for those fields
Regards
Arith
Hi Nikki,
as Ajay wrote there is no standard functionality that automatically copys the price from a material X to another material Y.
Depending on the exact requirements you can choose one of the following work-around solutions:
In the first option you only need to enter a single costing item in the cost estimate. This costing item contains the referenced material/plant. Then the price and the CCS will be rolled-up into this cost estimate.
Option two is a much more simple.
For both options you can enter the data manually or by a custom program (BatchInput for MM02 or KKPA).
It is important to do this after the 'original' costing run to trigger the current cost estimate's values.
Regards,
Johannes
Hi..
To analysis your problem, I need full screen of the s_alr_87013611 and head tab screen of the assessment cycle.
Hi,
Transfer price uses for moving products with own price (different from legal and corporate) and posting internal revenue. TP is working when you moving products between different PCs.
Mostly it uses for controlling reporting.
Hi..
You check whether you input Procurement Alternatives for valuation type using t-code ck91.
