Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP ERP Financials - Controlling
Viewing all 8508 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Re: BOM is not is not populated sales oder costing

March 7, 2016, 2:32 am
$
0
0

Hi..Ajay

 

 

My BOOK3 BOM level 5 finished products are maintain 2 is same material codes but character sticks values are different and other 2 is same material codes caring but character sticks values are different

 

 

1) we are maintain 5 finished material how the cost can be roll up one finished product to other finished product? my knowledge  cost can be roll up the lower level material to next higher level material in our scenario all are finished how the cost can be roll up?

 

 

Thanks and regards

P.Ramakrishna

↧
Search

Re: ML Closing Issue

March 7, 2016, 2:32 am
$
0
0

Hi Ibrahim

 

Is that user married ?

 

I think the error is justified. The same thing happens when you carry out Settlement (CO88)..

 

You should ideally schedule this in the form of a background job during the night, in such a case

 

Ajay M

↧
↧

Re: CO-PA Planning

March 7, 2016, 2:40 am
$
0
0

Hi Sushil

 

1. You have to select the two buttons in 2 steps. You cant select both at once

 

2. Check the user that posted those 24 line items and also the Posting date. you will come to know who did that  you can access those details in KE25

 

Ajay M

 

PS: Request you to close your threads once your issue is fixed. you can close by marking any of the relevant answer as CORRECT ANSWER. For any workaround solution, you can specify it as HELPFUL ANSWER.. Incase no solution is available, Close your thread by marking it as "Assumed Answered" . This helps others in future to know how the issue was resolved

 

 

 

Hope you will do your bit for a better SCN

↧

Re: ML Closing Issue

March 7, 2016, 8:44 am
$
0
0

Hi Kumar,

 

The issue that users are working in rotations, and may be using system 20 hours daily. consider from 6 AM till 2 AM next day. this means I can schedule after 2 o'clock, 4 hours not enough to finish the ML closing that's why I was asking for any alternative option to work during working hours.

 

Regards,

Ibrahim Mohamed

↧

Report Writer: Access Report via BTC vs. GR55 "Execute with Selection Screen"

March 7, 2016, 9:10 am
$
0
0

Hello everyone,

 

I created a report writer report, I started from Report 7KU0_001 (Library 7KK).

I created report writer group "R104".

I also created a Z-Transaction to execute the report:

BTC.jpg

If I start the report via the BTC it looks like this:

viaBTC.jpg

However I want it to start with the same screen as if I started the report via GR55.

 

I can navigate from starting with BTC to "GR55-Start" like this:

viaBTC_changetoGR55.jpg

This is, how it is supposed to look like:

viaGR55.jpg

I know that in a former version we had already managed to start the report with the "GR55-View". Can somebody help me out and let me know what I am missing??

THANK YOU SO MUCH!

Tabea

↧
↧

Missing authorization for BOM (ck40n)

March 7, 2016, 6:23 pm
$
0
0

Hello Experts,

 

My user encounter error message CK581 Missing authorization for BOM seems like not an authorization issue.

 

1st SU53 S_CTS_SADM (CTS_ADMFCT: TABL | DESTSY: ABC | DOMAIN: ' ') try to add a role for this missing authorization object

     same error: CK581 Missing authorization for BOM

 

2nd SU53 is S_BTCH_ADM (Y) - not allowed to assign to end user.

 

Run a system trace but no error or missing authorization.

 

 

Hope you can able to help us in resulting this issue. Try to search but no luck.

 

Thank you in advance for all your help.

↧

Re: BOM is not is not populated sales oder costing

March 7, 2016, 8:56 pm
$
0
0

Hi..Sir..

 

 

 

I am not able to understand 10/20 and 30/50  where i can maintain the the 10/20 and 30/50 whether the character stick values or item level in sales order level.can you explain breifly

 

 

Thanks and regards

P.Ramakrishna

↧

Re: BOM is not is not populated sales oder costing

March 7, 2016, 9:27 pm
$
0
0

Hi...sir

 

 

Finally my sales product is Only BOOK3. 10/20  and 30/50 not sales products

 

 

 

Thanks and regards

P.Ramakrishna

↧
Search

Re: f-02 field status for vendor

March 7, 2016, 10:24 pm
$
0
0

hi,

 

i thing those fields are appearing in f-02 because of some config your maintaining in vendor related setting for example base line date is appearing because in fbzp under all company code in vendor box there is a spl gl item box in that box you delete the spl gl that is used in f-02 then you come and post again in f-02 then base line date will not appear

 

rookie

↧
↧

Error Message. BK 202 Document contains errors during CAT7

March 7, 2016, 11:02 pm
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

I am facing an error ''BK 202- Document contains errors'' when, I am executing transaction CAT7- Transfer to Controlling. If , I carry out a test run initially, system is not displaying any error message, but when, I am running update run, it is giving the above error message.

 

Can anybody assist me in this?

 

Regards,

Akshay Zirmirkar

↧

Plan values posting single document for all line items in COPA

March 8, 2016, 12:02 am
$
0
0

Hi Friends,

 

While uploading plan values through transaction KEFC, system is generating single document for all line items.

 

Is it possible to create each line item for each COPA document in COPA.

 

For Ex:

In excel sheet we had maintained around 100 line items.

while uploading time system creating single document for all line items.

we need each document for each line item.

 

 

Thanks and Regards,

Thiru.

↧

Cumulative Price does not correspond to Cost component split

March 8, 2016, 1:07 am
$
0
0

Hello,

I've ML /actual costing on my system.

During year end I perform actual calculation and alternative/cumulative calculation.

When I see *** price I see for a Raw Mat. 110.18.85.01 price 6,4058

 

Now I see in FG 4750.12.02 this Raw Material is:

 

* correctly valuated in Multilevel structure (CKMLQS or CKM3N) with price 6,4058

* not the same amount in Cost component split which takes  price 6,371

 

why the same transaction (CKM3N) does not show the same amount for different views (Multilevel structure view and Cost component view)?

 

Thanks in advance for any kind help

 

Chiara

↧

Re: Plan values posting single document for all line items in COPA

March 8, 2016, 1:18 am
$
0
0

Hi Thiru

 

How does it matter to you? In COPA you are more concerned about what Chars are populated

 

One is certainly not concerned with whether they are posted in same or separate document

 

Ajay M

 

PS: Request you to close your threads once your issue is fixed. you can close by marking any of the relevant answer as CORRECT ANSWER. For any workaround solution, you can specify it as HELPFUL ANSWER.. Incase no solution is available, Close your thread by marking it as "Assumed Answered" . This helps others in future to know how the issue was resolved

 

 

 

Hope you will do your bit for a better SCN

↧
↧

Re: Default Object Type

March 9, 2016, 2:30 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

If you click on F4 in the settlement receiver, then it will display the list of receivers which are maintained in the settlement profile. It wont default, when you select the rule.

 

Regards,

Mukthar

↧

Re: IOs Allocation Structure

March 9, 2016, 2:31 am
$
0
0

Mr. Ajay,

 

I have searched for the same question, and the following is the reply:

 

distribution: in simple words distribute some cost A to B.

Before distribution (A= 100, B=0) after distribution (A=50, B=50) in these case we distributed costs from one object to another object.

 

Settlement means it settles the total costs to another object. either IO or Prd order

 

Before settlement (A=100 (60), B 0 or (40) (assume some partial settlements or goods delivered (40 from A to B)) after settlement ( A=0, B=100).

 

A is temporary objective; either could be internal order or production order

B is real objective; GL account or cost center or any other object.

 

However, I don't think that this is the difference?

 

could you help me?

 

Regards,

Ibrahim Mohamed

↧
Search

Re: ML Actual with Multiple valuation run

March 9, 2016, 2:55 am
$
0
0

Hi Ajay and Kamal,

 

thanks for your answers,

 

my point is when we do want to have any new roll out  and request is new to run Actual ML.. would be there any impact... new company code.. again we need to setup new GL for this process...? do you for see any other impact...

 

if yes if we want to go with alternative valuation run.. my understanding it would be fine right? any upcoming rolluts?

 

thanks

kareem

↧

Re: ML Actual with Multiple valuation run

March 9, 2016, 3:05 am
$
0
0

Hi Kareem

 

no negative impact..

 

ML is what you activate at plant level. So for any new rollout using same chart of account, you don't need to do anything

 

but if you use valuation grouping code in obyc, then you need to do obyc for every rollout

 

Ajay M

↧
↧

Re: IOs Allocation Structure

March 9, 2016, 3:13 am
$
0
0

Hi

 

Settlement is usually for temporary cost objects like internal orders or wbs. Here you transfer cost to one or few cost objects or even assets

 

in allocation/distribution, this is for CC. Here you can allocate to any number of receiver cost objects. Asset can't be receiver here
. Also basis for assessment and distribution can be many like skf etc. In settlement it is onky % or equivalence no.

 

Ajay M

↧

Re: ML Actual with Multiple valuation run

March 9, 2016, 3:13 am
$
0
0

May be I posted incorrectly here..

 

Now when we run actual costing CLMLCP understood it will update leading ledger…  however for this rollout we have NON leading in place… so my point how to update non leading ledzer book in this case for this company code.

 

thanks

kareem

↧

Re: ML Actual with Multiple valuation run

March 9, 2016, 3:21 am
$
0
0

Hi Kareem

 

what you post in leading ledger, gets inherited into NL

 

Ehp5 Offers a new feature to do revaluation for parallel ledger separately

 

Ajay M

↧
Viewing all 8508 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>