Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP ERP Financials - Controlling
Viewing all 8508 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Re: Reposting Existing COPA line items with new Profit center

March 15, 2016, 7:46 am
$
0
0

Hello Venkatesh,

 

bhaskar is right. The correction works best with a correction posting through KE21N.

I have actually created a query to download the the contents in Excel (can also be done via KE24), then I change the contents in Excel and use LSMW with a KE21N recording to do the correction posting.

 

To do it the "FI-way" you can also reverse by either posting the docs with LSMW putting all values on "-" and reposting them with the "+"-values and correct profit-center.

There is also a report for mass reversal of CO-PA documents, I just can't find it right now.

 

Since we have this every once in a while I now have a program which also populates fields like the the reference documents. This will make the CO-PA document look like an original document out of SD/MM/...

 

Best Regards,
Christian

↧
Search

Re: Semi finished material BOM costing base

March 15, 2016, 8:04 am
$
0
0

Hello,

 

By changing the Lot size in material master. I achieve my solution.

 

Hope it helps..

 

Thank you,

Nr.

↧
↧

Re: SAP Cost group upload using excel sheet

March 15, 2016, 8:02 am
$
0
0

Hi Cecile,

Maintaining these changes in Excel is not easier than maintaining same changes directly in the system.  It is rather something cultural.  If you try to put a business case on such change your ROI will be maybe 20 years from now (if at all).

I can drag and drop same Cost Center between two groups in the same hierarchy in one action in SAP.  In Excel you will cut a line from one place, add line in another place, paste value, save file, next go for upload Z transaction. Not mentioning typos, files not being saved, wrong files uploaded, etc.  It is something quite over engineered.  Moreover, it is simply dangerous!  Think about some wrong file being uploaded, you can corrupt all your master data without a chance to roll back.

Anyway, good luck!

Paulo

↧

Re: No target costs during KKS1 KV172

March 16, 2016, 2:12 am
$
0
0

Hi Ajay,

 

Thanks a lot. I had a similar gut feeling about this and you confirmed it.

 

I will have to either switch off the user exit or live with the remaining variances.

 

Best regards,

Karol

↧

No default document type

March 16, 2016, 3:33 am
$
0
0

Hello,

I am a PP consultant, when I am trying to confirm production order using t code CO15, system displays message "No default document type found for company code". Can anyone please guide with specific t codes how to assign default documents.

 

Thanks and regards

 

Sumit.

↧
↧

Re: No default document type

March 16, 2016, 3:41 am
$
0
0

Hi Sumit

 

 

Try CO11N

 

 

 

Kamal

↧

Re: No default document type

March 16, 2016, 3:44 am
$
0
0

Hi Sumit

 

I think CO/FI real time reco is active in FI (New GL)

 

Refer this setting and see if a doc type is assigned here

 

SCN.jpg

 

If you are on SFIN, refer this setting

 

SCN1.jpg

 

Ajay M

↧

Result Analysis on Project-Cost based POC- PS&FICO

March 16, 2016, 4:04 am
$
0
0

Dear SAP Guru's

 

Assumption:


RA is done at end of a period and both PLAN & ACTUAL data upto RA Period are considered not just for the Period RA is being executed.

 

Method used : Cost Based POC -03, Expert mode config.

 

For the first period -I

 

All the values are coming correct in RA and subsequently i did the settlement.

 

RA Calculation:

Planned Revenue:  100000 AED

Planned Cost          80000 AED

Actual revenue        0 AED

Actual Cost            20000 AED

Percentage of Completion = Actual Cost/Planned Cost*100

        = (20000/80000)*100= 25%.

Calculated Revenue  = POC*Planned Rev.  = 25%*100000 = 25000 AED

Revenue in Excess Billing =  Calculated revenue- Actual revenue =  25000-0= 25000 AED.

Profit = Calculated Revenue – Actual Cost= 25000-20000 = 5000.

 

all fine for first period.

 

For the second Period:-II

 

In 2nd period, we raise an invoice of 40000 AED to our customer and also our actual costs in the project increased to 40000.

 

Expected calculation are

RA Calculation:

Total Planned Revenue:  100000 AED

Total Planned Cost          80000 AED

Actual Revenue             40000 AED

Actual Cost                   40000 AED

Percentage of Completion = Actual Cost/Planned Cost*100

        = (40000/80000)*100= 50%.

Calculated Revenue  = POC*Planned Rev.  = 50%*100000 = 50000 AED

Revenue in Excess Billing =  Calculated revenue- Actual revenue = 50000-40000= 10000 AED.

Profit = Calculated Revenue – Actual Cost= 50000-40000 = 10000.

 

But When i am running the RA actual cost under the section cumulative it is only picking up the actual cost(20000) which has been booking in the 2nd period only,which changes the entire calculation and i get different result.

Actual revenue  40000 AED  , Actual cost 20000 AED  POC - 25%

Revenue affecting net income 25000 AED Profit 5000 AED

Revenue surplus 15000 AED.

 

Please correct me i have got wrong understanding or i did missed any thing.

 

Let me know if you need any other info from my side to understand the issue more clearly.

↧
Search

Re: Result Analysis on Project-Cost based POC- PS&FICO

March 16, 2016, 4:29 am
$
0
0

Hi Avinash

 

 

You take your cut off period properly..it takes only one period when you are running period 2

 

so change it 16/2015 then I think it will take both the period of 2016

 

 

 

 

Kamal

↧
↧

Re: kepm(Copa Planning) : Display periods in columns

March 16, 2016, 5:24 am
$
0
0

Hi,

I want to display each period in a separate column so that i can upload plan data at once.... Is it possible?


Yes you can;

You should enter period/year parametre range not at the planning level, but at the planning package. You should create planning package for each year, and enter the the period/year parametre (001.2009 - 012.2009).

After these process you should pass the layout which you assign parametre set; You can adjust the layout with tansaction KE15. Select the layout than go to EDIT > Gen data selection > Gen data selection (Ctrl+F5) than extract Period /year from Selected characteristic screen to Available characteristic.


Than you can display each period in a seperate column with;

Within the layout; insert element > create value field with charateristic and period / year parametre comes automaticly, enter the period 001.2009 for january

↧

Re: Result Analysis on Project-Cost based POC- PS&FICO

March 16, 2016, 6:11 am
$
0
0

Makes sense to me.. Does that mean the same thing needs to be done each month - i.e. every month the cut off period should be last period of previous year?

↧

Re: Cost Object in Subcontract Accounting

March 16, 2016, 6:18 am
↧

Re: Result Analysis on Project-Cost based POC- PS&FICO

March 16, 2016, 6:48 am
$
0
0

Ajay

 

 

Once you set this I think it will work...

 

suppose I want 1st qr then last cut off will be last period of previous period..for 2nd qr it will be last period of 1st qr

 

 

Kamal

↧
↧

Re: PUP is not getting copied to selling Plants

March 17, 2016, 4:25 am
$
0
0

Dear Zain,

 

I think OSS note can help you: 1529517 - Material transfer posting as multilevel process

 

Check the process category involved in this transfer from Production Plant to the Sales Plant, you can find this in the ML Document (Maybe BUBM and VUBM for material transfer posting) and check view V_CKMLMV01 which maintain table CKMLMV009 it the Multilevel Process is set for this process category.

 

Best regards,

 

Gabriel Coleti

↧

Re: IW32 Service Order Costing planned and actual parameters

March 17, 2016, 4:55 am
$
0
0

Dear Ajay,

 

We can wait for 2-3 days to get it implemented. The change will be available for testing on Monday as Quality system is down for some work.

 

Will update this thread next week and close the incident Thanks for reminding that in your first reply.

 

Thank you again!

 

Regards,

Gov

↧
Search

Loss-Free Valuation MRN3 SET Materials

March 17, 2016, 5:10 am
$
0
0

Hello together,

 

I need support for the following situation:

 

With the Transaction MRN3 I can devaluate materials by a several percentage fom it's average market price in the specific year.

 

For example:

 

Material 123456

Year 2015

 

Sold 3 times:

 

Jan 3€

Jul 5€

Aug 4€

 

Average Price 4€

Loss-Free Valuation percentage 50%

So I can devaluate the material to 2€

 

So far, so good.

 

Now my problem:

 

Same material is also part of a SET material:

 

SET Material 999999 with Price of 100€. In this SET there are lot's of materials:

444444

555555

123456

 

These 3 materials do not have any price because the total price of 100€ is on the top at the SET material 999999

 

No the same example like above:

↧

Re: Loss-Free Valuation MRN3 SET Materials

March 17, 2016, 5:19 am
$
0
0

...continue message above:

 

No the same example like above:

 

Material 123456

Year 2015

 

Sold 3 times:

 

Jan 3€

Jul 5€

Aug 4€

 

The SET was sold 2 times in 2015

 

No the programm calculates 1*3+1*5+1*4+2*0 = Average Price 2,4€

The reason is that the material 123456 is considered two times as a Price of 0€ because of being part of the SET 999999.

 

Is there a posibility to consider this fact in the programm or to exclude that amount of the material 123456 which is part of the SET?

 

Thanks!

↧
↧

Re: overhead posting with no 'plant' filled

March 17, 2016, 6:41 am
$
0
0

Hello - I just looked at COEP in our system and for Overhead cost element the Plant is not populated - I am guessing that is because the Order Number is there which will link back to a plant. ?

 

There are other entries, Inventory difference, for example, that do not reference an Order, and have the Material number and the plant populated. 

 

I expect this is standard SAP set up - I don't recall that we spent anytime deciding this kind of thing. A custom report could be written that would draw the Plant from the order number.

 

So, it is not just your place.

 

Althea

↧

Error when uploading SKF via LSMW

March 17, 2016, 7:28 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I have created a LSWM to batch upload some SKF using LSMW - BAPI import method (ACC_STAT_KEY_FIG). When trying to upload the data I receive an error message which is KI222: Cost Centes 1100 does not exist on 29.02.2016. Validity of alla cost centers is 31.12.9999 ... therefore I cannot really understand what the issue could be...

 

please help

 

Thanks

BR

Salvatore

↧

Variance analysis with actual costing

March 17, 2016, 7:54 am
$
0
0

Hello everyone,

 

I would appreciate some pointers regarding how variance analysis works in combination with actual costing. When you calculate variances with KKS1 and then settle production orders with CO88, the calculated variances are settled to FI. So it is my understanding that if they are also settled to materials as price differences, which in turn is credited/debited to the stock and COGS accounts with the closing postings, that would be a double posting. Am I missing something?

 

Thanks.

↧
Viewing all 8508 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>