Dear Ajay,
Thanks for your kind help. Can I assign PC 9010 to Co Area 2000. PC 9010 already assign in Co Area 9000. In that scenario what can I do.
Thanks for your advance co-operations.
Best Regards,
Shoyeb
↧
Re: STO between different controlling area....
↧
Re: COPA-BZIRK is missing for KEDR
Hello Ajay,
Thanks a lot. But the issue is that after done as you suggested its still in blue colour and can not be selected to push left side.
Please suggest any other way if possible.
Thanks
Ravi
↧
↧
KSV5 - Document Type SA is not relevant for IVA Registry
Hello Gurus,
Am getting this error while running tcode KSV5.
No update performed due to an error
Message no. GA719
Diagnosis
A serious error occurred during processing.
System Response
Processing is continued as far as possible, but results are not posted.
Procedure
This error is shown in the error list before this error message. Here you can find more information about this particular error.
This is occuring for all periods. Please provide analysis for the related issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Shanthi
↧
Re: Debit/Credit indicator is inconsistent during Goods receipt in ML Actual costing, Multiple valuation scenario
Dear Suresh
I would invite arturo senosain on this thread. He is best at ML.
Regards
Rajneesh Saxena
↧
Re: Actual cost component values
Hi Chandra
Thanks for the prompt response.
Dude you have mentioned the actual price calculation in ML however i am interested in how system break this periodic unit price PUP in different cost components?
I will appreciate if you can share some information regarding this.
Regards
↧
↧
Re: Calibration between COEP and COSR
Hi,
I might be missing some point in your question, but GEBER is not playing any part in COSR table, which sums up the totals, fund or any other FI/FM assignment field simply does not exist. If you enter SKF by periods, then they will be stored in COEPR table, where you have the funds. Otherwise, the table would be COKR.
Regards,
Eli
P.S. COEP table does not contain data about SKF, so I'm not sure how you can compare COSR with COEP.
↧
Re: Planning of Internal Order
Hi
1. You can plan for IO as a whole in KO12
2. You can plan for IO at cost element level using KPF6
Br. Ajay M
↧
Re: Enter rate AUD / INR rate type M for 01.01.2012 in the system settings Mess
Hi i tried applying the above solution for error listed below:
Enter rate DEM / PTE rate type M for 27.05.1997 in the system settings
Message no. SG105
Diagnosis
For the conversion of an amount into another currency, an entry is missing in the currency conversion table.
Procedure
Add the missing entry in the currency conversion table.
You can then continue to process the commercial transaction.
But still i am unable to resolve the issue , Can some one help me out to resolve the issue i am getting while filling the Setup Table in Purchasing
↧
Re: KE96 from- Transport/Translation
Thank you Ajay .
Regards
babu
↧
↧
Classify/Reclassify Material as per Quality
Hello Experts,
I am FICO consultant. My Query integrated with PP,QM, MM and CO Module. Please help for resolving this issue.
Lets understand from production Process. Created Production Order Co01 and Released the Order. Finished Goods Recd from Production to stock 101 Movement Type. And Confirmed all the activities for the order Co11n.
At Quality level:- Inspection Lot Created. Results are Recorded and Usage Decision made as Rejected. From here my requirement starts.
Three Types of Qualities Prime, Seconds and Scrap available for each Product. Low Quality product as Seconds and Very low quality product as Scrap.
Obviously, firm want to produce prime quality, but at quality level doesn't meet the requirement specified for the prime one, so it is rejected and transferred to either seconds or scrap. What Customizing steps are required for this scenario and what are the standard reports available in SAP, and what are Front end T codes for verifying the movements of product from prime to Scrap and prime to Seconds. Please give detailed explanation, so that i can develop the required report.
Eagerly waiting for your suggestion, please help.
Thanks
Mohd Ismail.
↧
Re: Indirect costs: how KE28 selects information
Dear all,
Thanks for the help but analyzing with another colleague here we found an error when the user had created the Top Down distribution. It was created two times with different parameters of summarization and copy in KE28, generating the problem of values distributed negatively.
Thanks for the help,
Diogo Patriota.
↧
Re: Top-down distribution with negative values
Dear All,
Thanks for the help but as I assumed in the other post, there was an error in Top Down distribution created by the user.
Diogo Patriota.
↧
Re: Production Variance Settlement
Hi,
The settlement profitle is assigned to the order type.
Do you use the same order type in both location?
↧
↧
Transferring Standard and Actual costs to COPA
Hi,
We are using 3 valuations (Legal, Profit Center and Group Valuations). In order to transfer standard and actual costs to COPA for all 3 valuations do we need to create 3 costings (total 6) for transferring standard and and 3 costings keys for transferring actual costing to COPA?
Thanks.
↧
Re: How to arrive the actual cost with out activating the Material ledger?
I think one of workaround would be:
Price control V for produced materials. Activation of user exit to transfer the full balance of production order to stock. There is a limitation here if you stiil have costs flowing into the prod order after final delivery.
Revaluation of activities at actuals, so that cost center are fully allocated to manufacturing order.
Price control V for all consumed materials.
Just an idea, I am sure there are others limitations there.
↧
Re: Transferring Standard and Actual costs to COPA
Hi Ravi
1. Legal Valuation is transferred to COPA using Costing Keys, which you already know
2. PC Valuation - > You need to allow in the Attributes Section of your Op Concern in KEA0
3. Group Valuation - Does not flow to COPA in standard SAP.. You need to do this using Exit COPA0005
Br. Ajay M
↧
Re: Transferring Standard and Actual costs to COPA
Hi Ajay,
I am talking the below configurations for transferring standard and actual costs to COPA for 3 valuations (Legal, Profit center and group). What if we created 3 costing keys for transferring actual costs for each of the 3 valuations. Why do we need an user exit COPA005?
Thanks,
↧
↧
cost & revenue gl's to pc or only revenue gl assigned to pc?
Hi Experts,
I have more issues regarding support projects as i am new fi consultant
Please clarify me with below questions
1. Is all cost & revenue gl assigned to pc through primary cost element or only revenue gl's are assigned to pc & exp. gl's to cc ?
2. can we post both ( exp & revenue) to pc through cost element or only revenue can be post to pc? How does it works? Please explain
If possible provide some example
↧
Re: Transferring Standard and Actual costs to COPA
Hi
You can create max of 6 costing keys.. But Costing Keys work in the OR fashion, not AND fashion
Only one of the costing keys will be considered for Valuation
For Group Valuation, you need to write user exit
Legal Valuation -> Costing Keys
PC Valuation -> KEA0 settings, if i am not wrong
Br. Ajay M
↧
Re: How to define different COGS account in OBYC based on customer group
Hi Sonia
One more option is to create a Z movement type and assign a new modifier in OMJJ instead of VAX
Usually, PGI is done from 601 movement type which triggers GBB VAX in OBYC
Create a Copy of 601 and change VAX to ZVX and assign another GL in GBB ZVX in OBYC
You can do this because company code is different in your case.. You can just ask them to use differnet movemnt type for PGI
Br. Ajay M
↧