Hello Experts,
In ECC 6.0 FI-AP my client wants to use the Purchase Card.
please let me know what are all configurations required and what is the payment method need to use.
Reward points awared for the replies.
Regards,
Suman
↧
ECC 6.0: FI-AP: Purchase Card USA (F110)
↧
Re: cost & revenue gl's to pc or only revenue gl assigned to pc?
Dear Ashwini
PC is an object which holds Revenues as well as Costs. While posting any expense in FI a CO object (CC) is required to be posted and through CC, expenses are also captured to PC. Whereas at the time of booking any revenue only PC is required as CC normally can not hold the revenues.
Regards
Rajneesh Saxena
↧
↧
KSU5- Difference between sender tracing factor and activity quantities
Hello SAP Gurus,
After I performed an allocation in KSU5, I have realized there have been a little bit inconsistency between the values my calculation and SAP's calculation.
Then I realized that there is difference betweeen activity quantities and sender tracing factor.
Here how it is
| Activities | Sender Tracing Factor | Activity Quantities |
|---|---|---|
| activity type 1 | 7 | 7 |
| activity type 2 | 44,800 | 45 |
| activity type 3 | 10,333 | 10 |
| activity type 4 | 37,900 | 38 |
| activity type 5 | 38,866 | 37 |
| activity type 6 | 13,677 | 14 |
Due this difference; after I run assesment at KSU5; the amounts don't seem quite exactly what I expected.
I wonder; why this happens. Why KSU5 doesnt use exactly same numbers from activity quantities?
instead of using activity values, why does it change these numbers?
Thanks a lot
Best Regards
↧
Re: KSU5- Difference between sender tracing factor and activity quantities
Hi Sadullah
Thats the built in logic.. And I believe it should be fine with any business, because it produces small rounding differences
After all, Costing is the art of approximation
Br. Ajay M
↧
Re: Different COA, with different Controlling Reports
Hi Venkat
1. Yes, you need to assign Group GL number in the GL number of each company code
2. Consolidation is not just combining the FSV of 4 company codes.. It is a whole process
Incase you are only looking at combining the FSVs, you can achieve it through BI reports
3. BI report should help you here
Br. Ajay M
↧
↧
Re: FF67 - Matchcode ID KRED K does not exist
Please go through number of blogs available on SAP Education / careers section.
If you have any specific questions etc. please let me know.
↧
Re: AFAB + KI235: Depreciation run don't read the Cost Center from the asset
lot of Thanks!!
This info is exactly what I was looking for!
↧
Re: Different COA, with different Controlling Reports
Thanks Ajay
↧
Re: Inter company asset transfer
Hi,
Can i have any suggestions on this plssss...
Thanks
Rafi
↧
↧
Re: Markup is not calculated in standard cost estimate
Hi Giovanna,
We are also facing same issue(Markup is not calculated in standard cost estimate) after above missing setup also. Only Standard cost estimate is coming without markup.
Could you please send any config & test case doc to me if you have any.
Warm Regards,
Suresh.
↧
Re: FF67 - Matchcode ID KRED K does not exist
How can i start in getting into sap
↧
Business scenarios ? BS acc created as Cost element
Hello,
Need your help to understand all possible business scenarios for which we will create a Cost element for a Balance sheet account (Q1 - Is it possible as a Primary CE & I know CE cat 90 is used for Secondary for BS acc). I'm already aware we can create CE for a BS account. But why (Q2 - Possible Business justifications)?
With example is more preferred. Related OSS notes as well. I already explored few threads still unsatisfied 
BR,
D'nesh
↧
Payment terms for Returns
Hi,
My client required payment terms to calculate for returns as in Customers invoices.
When I checked with couple of customer Returns, due date is taking as document date which is due on Immediate.
Please advice, why returns are not fetching due dates as in Customer master. Please recommend if any SAP notes.
Appreciate if you can reply soon.
Thanks & regards
Yajath Reddy.
↧
↧
WIP revaluation in ML - initial WIP value/quantity upload.
Dear Colleagues,
In one of our businesses (chemical process) we have a scenario that we issue components into a process in one/two consecutive periods (build a load) and then start receive output from this load for another 12 month. Once one load is build and starts producing output another one is build. At one point of time we have 12 loads active.
So we have to account for WIP.
We use ML/Actual costing and revalue WIP at actual costs in ML.
Now we face a situation that we have to change the way we model this process in SAP. Untill now the whole process was represented by one Product Cost Collector (for all loads). Now we decided to represent each load with its own Product Cost Collector.
In MES system (outside of SAP) we have all the historical information about when and how many components where issued into a load.
Now we face an issue of somehow updating this historical information (WIP quantity document) on newly created PCCs. This historical information is necessary for ML WIP revaluation.
Has anyone of you faced a similar requirement?
Regards,
Szymon
↧
Re: WIP revaluation in ML - initial WIP value/quantity upload.
↧
Re: Payment terms for Returns
Hi YR
Are you issuing a Credit Memo to the customer with ref to the original invoice? If yes, then the system copies the due date from invoice into the Cr memo line item
What is the process that you are following?
Br. Ajay M
↧
Re: Product costing
Still not getting it sir.
↧
↧
Value Field discrepancy in Quality & Production System
Hello All,
This is with reference to COPA value field discrepancy.
I would like to bring this issue to all your kind notice and expecting a response.
In the month Of January 2014 we had a Quality refresh and now there is EHP6 upgrade in progress
We have created a custom transaction for uploading the KE21 values in SAP, While uploading this, business had identified that there is discrepancy in the Value filed description due to which they are unable to process the KE21 Values.
I have checked our Quality system & Production system, they are not in Sync. and as per business the Production system the Value field from the Production system are OK, but the Quality system is not.
And there is no specific configuration happened related to COPA after refresh.
I have checked the DD04L & DD04T table to trace the changes made to these Value fields, but could not find any thing. and also i have checked in KEA6, KEA0 & KE24 transaction to compare these Value filed description.
Our Custom transaction is dependent on the COPA value field alignment, based on which the BDC is prepared.
I would like to understand on what basis the value field alignment would be displayed in KE21 transaction.
Also let me know if any other way to find out , who has made the changes to COPA value fileds
Appreciate your quick response
Thanks in advance.
↧
Tables of the transactions KSS2 and KSII
Hi people,
Could you tell us where is/are the table where the data are when execute the transactions: KSS2 and KSII?
Thanks,
Rosana.
↧
Re: Tables of the transactions KSS2 and KSII
Hi Rosanna
1. Activity Price Info is stored in COST table
2. Splitting Info is stored in COSS table... The Object Number field in COSS table corresponds to Cost Center.. Object Number for Cost Center will be KL* or KS*
Br. Ajay M
↧