Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP ERP Financials - Controlling
Viewing all 8508 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: AFPO field WEMNG overflow for Order.

$
0
0

Hi Zunaid,

I believed that the shortdump is COMPUTE_BCD_OVERFLOW. Maximum length of field WEMNG is 10 and increase in length is not possible due technical restriction. You are recommended to create a new product cost collector (see SAP note 1700799).

Best regards, Gordon


Re: Quotation costing in Sales

Re: MTO & MTS

$
0
0

How is it possible to make the same product in MTO & MTS simultaneously ? The material master data setting can be only one, right ?

KPSI : CCA Plan Reconciliation

$
0
0

Dears

 

What is the exact purpose of transaction KPSI : CCA Plan Reconciliation ?

I could not understand clearly from the helps available.

Re: MTO & MTS

$
0
0

Hi

 

Mat master setup will be the same as of MTS, as the mat to be delivered is different at packaging level, but the requirement will be generated from sale order and prod orders will be SO assigned.

 

Regards

 

Rajneesh

Re: KPSI : CCA Plan Reconciliation

$
0
0

Hi

 

In PP there is a functionality called Long term planning (LTP). Through this the requirement for activities are generated together with the production requirement,which can be reconciled using KPSI with our activity planning done through KP26.

 

Regards

 

Rajneesh

Re: KPSI : CCA Plan Reconciliation

$
0
0

So the reconciliation is comparing the long-term activities required and the activities planned in KP26 to show the +/- ?

Re: Quotation costing in Sales

$
0
0

Hi Kamal Kumar,

 

Thanks for giving reply. Can you please provide some in details about configuration and business process steps,

 

Thanks,

KISHORE


Re: MTO & MTS

$
0
0

how a material can be different at packaging level ?

I understand packaging is just a protective (value added/non-value added) which may not be normally part of the normal production activity ?

 

If the material is to be different, the strategy of production should be different at the material level ?

And I hope only one strategy can be assigned to material either MTO or MTS ?

 

Could you please give more inputs for understanding ?

Re: MTO & MTS

$
0
0

Hi nikki

 

 

Just additing to Rajneesh..

 

Flow in MTS:  Material > Prod Ord > Inventory > SO

 

Flow in MTO:  Material > SO > Prod Ord > SO Inventory

 

 

Same material diff process...................

CK11N - Info Record, the Last or the Cheapest ?

$
0
0

Hello Gurus,

 

  • I need to update the cost of a FG with the price of the last purchase of a raw material
  • In my variant on OKKN 'Price from Purchasing Info Record' is the first strategy
  • While executing CK11n, the cheapest info record is being selected
  • I've checked note '351835 - Valuation variant w/ purchasing info record strategies', where it says SAP will take the last document,

but note '713111 - FAQ: pricing in CK11/CK11N' says the SAP will look for the vendor with the lowest value.

 

 

Is there any configuration missing for the system take the last document created ?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Filipe Santos.

Re: KO88 - Settlement of Internal Orders and FI integration

Re: KO88 - Settlement of Internal Orders and FI integration

$
0
0

Hi Filipe,

  

Thank you very much for the suggestion.

  

I have checked my CO-FI Integration set up. All seems to be in
order.

 

My settings are as follows:

1.  Real time integration active,

 

 

2. Account Determination active,

3. Document type “SA”,

4. Use check Boxes

    1. Cross company code checked
    2. Cross Business area checked
    3. Cross functional area checked
    4. Cross Profit center checked
    5. Cross segment checked
    6. Cross fund checked
    7. Cross grant check
    8. Cross Cost center NOT CHECKED.

5. On OK17

    1. I have a substitution for all my assessment cost elements
      to a G/L Account.
    2. Account determination for Primary Cost Element accounts IS NOT CHECKED.

  

The configuration seems ok to me, however what I do not understand is why the Primary Cost Element is being posted in Finance without a CO Object account assignment.

 

This is my real question?

 

Your further assistance is greatly appreciated.

 

Regards,

Godhelp

Re: KO88 - Settlement of Internal Orders and FI integration

$
0
0

Hi Godhelp,

 

Please refer to note 1647916 .

 

Regards,

Filipe Santos.

Re: KO88 - Settlement of Internal Orders and FI integration

$
0
0

Hi Filipe,

 

Great! Thank you very much. this note works!!

 

Just an additional question -- how do I fix the history?

 

I really appreciate your assistance.

 

Best Regards,

Godhelp


Order Settlement for previous periods

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

Request your help and expert advise.

 

We are on ECC 6.0

 

We have not yet setted the process orders  till now. We are now settling the orders for period-4 directly.( Settlement period-04) in CO88 -Collective order settlement . System is now selecting all  orders from p-1 to p-4.

 

The question is - after settlement for settlement period p-4 directly , will it post settlements to the individual periods ( i.e 1,2,3) or post it to the current period ( i.e p-4) ?

 

(We have also implemented SAP Note : 1135678 - KO88/CO88: Settling for closed previous period, CK122. The note says, it allows posting to previous periods even though MM period was closed)

 

Regards

RG23CPARTII MACROS

$
0
0

Dear All,

 

We want Latest RG23CPART II Macros file.

 

My macros file not cover all field .

 

 

 

Thanks

Tarun

How to reverse-check that which PIR did Costing Run pick-up while doing Costing? [CK40N]

$
0
0

Hi,

 

I have a query:

When I execute a Costing Run, before “Release” Step, I can see Cost of Goods Sold.

Example:

costing.jpg

I already know the P.I.R., Vendor, Purchase Organization – almost everything.

But, I want to reverse-check it!

I mean to say, can I know from Costing Run screen, which PIR did Costing Run pick-up while doing Costing?

or

Did it not pick PIR and picked something else (example: Quotation Price) for Costing the material?

How can I assure myself?

Please guide!

 

Thank you!


Best regards,

Vinay Kumar Srivastava

Re: Order Settlement for previous periods

$
0
0

Hi Siva,

 

It posts the settlement document in period 4 only not for previous periods.

 

Regards,

Mukthar

Re: Sales Office does not come in KE30

$
0
0

Hi Ahmad,

 

First the line items in KE24, whether the new sales office are updated in the document or not. If yes, check the form of the report. As you said you have not added the new sale offices in the report, then add it in the form by KE35.

 

Regards,

Mukthar

Viewing all 8508 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>