Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP ERP Financials - Controlling
Viewing all 8508 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Re: Cost of one BOM with three different materials

February 13, 2015, 2:19 am
$
0
0

Hi

 

What I understood is that you have multiple BOMs for one header material and want to know the cost for header material.

 

By default system pick first BOM for cost estimate. If you wish to do estimate with particular BOM then you need to mention production version at the time of cost estimate or else you can default this version in material master at costing tabs.

 

if you want to do cost estimate using all the BOMs then you need to use Mixed costing functionality to achieve this.

 

you do cost estimate using CK11N, CK24 or CK40N.

 

Regards

 

Rajneesh Saxena

↧
Search

Re: Order Settlement for previous periods

February 13, 2015, 2:40 am
$
0
0

Dear Siva,

 

It depends on the no of confirmations linked with that Order:

 

Example: Order was created in the past, till date order is in open status and Order was settled in Jan, 2015.

Additional information:

Order Start Date:Dec,2013  Order valid to : May,2014 ,

Actual Finish date of the Order: April,2014

 

Though order was settled in the Jan,2015. Settlement entry will be posted in the 1st period,2014 only. as there is an option in the settlement screen posting period.

 

Order.jpg

 

 

Example Enry:

 

O1.jpg

 

 

Regards,

Pavan Kumar Arvapally

↧
↧

Re: Order Settlement for previous periods

February 13, 2015, 2:51 am
$
0
0

Thank you Mukthar & Pavan kumar. It seems it will post all variances to the period which you have selected on the selection screen.

↧

Re: Order Settlement for previous periods

February 13, 2015, 3:12 am
$
0
0

Hi Siva,

 

 

Your understanding is correct, the following points may add value:

 

As you said:

"It seems it will post all variances to the period which you have selected on the selection screen."


Order should have confirmations in the said posting period.


If there are no confirmations happen  in said posting period,there will be no entry will be generated in that posting period.


Actual confirmation will play a key role.


Conclusion: Settlement entry depends on Actual Confirmation + Posting period.

 

 

 

 

Regards,

Pavan Kumar Arvapally




↧

CKM3N_cost component view not the same!

February 13, 2015, 3:22 am
$
0
0

Hello,

if I compare 2 different views in CKM3N for the same material and same alternative Costing Run for Cost components, I see two different values. See the 2 images attached as example.

Could you kindly explain why this behaviour of the system?

 

Thanks a lot in advance.

Best regards,

 

Chiara


↧
↧

Re: KO88 - Settlement of Internal Orders and FI integration

February 13, 2015, 3:56 am
$
0
0

Hi Godhelp,

 

The best option would be to reverse the settlements and execute it again or you can try to

delete the FI document and execute transaction FAGLCOFITRNSFRCODOCS.

 

If this is not possible open a message to SAP, component FI-GL-GL-X with the FI documents

and the necessary updates.

 

Regards,

Filipe Santos.

↧

Re: CK11N - Info Record, the Last or the Cheapest ?

February 13, 2015, 3:56 am
$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

 


Any thoughts ?

 

Thanks in advance.

Filipe Santos.

↧

Re: CK11N - Info Record, the Last or the Cheapest ?

February 13, 2015, 7:35 am
$
0
0

Hi Filipe,

 

I'm not sure which info record is being selected when you configure okkn that way, but by using user exit COPCP005 you can choose the last purchase info record

↧
Search

Cross Company costing in a Multiply Valuation (Legal/Group)

February 11, 2015, 6:55 am
$
0
0

Hi all,

 

I’m in the process to write a BBP for a  multiply valuation in legal and group valuation in a cross company scenario with additive costs.

 

Unfortunately I don’t have the possibility to test the process because I don’t have an SAP development system available.

 

The simplified scenario is:

  • two company codes X and Y within the same controlling area.
  • Two plants Plant A  under company X and Plant B  under company Y

 

This is the configuration I would set-up:

  • FI and ML configured with legal valuation /currency type 10 and group valuation currency type 30.
  • Company X has Material Ledger type 3 and Company Y has Material Ledger type 2. I’m aware that this configuration doesn’t allow to push price and exchange rate differences from the company X to Y when they exchange finish product and ultimately to get the actual COGS.
  • The Controlling Area is configured with  currency type 30.
  • Operating Concern is configured in currency type 30 and 10
  • Cost component structure is the same in all the company codes
  • BOM and Routing   are plant A Company Code X where the production take place.
  • The material code for the finish product is the same in both the companies
  • The material code in the Company Y plant B has a special procurement key 40/Plant B
  • Additive costs are maintained in the Plant B Company Code Y. Additive costs are used to integrate the costing in  the Company Y/Plant B with Mark Up and Freight costs.
  • In the cost component structure the additive cost component Mark Up is configured as “Delta Profit for Group Costing”.
  • I would like to configure two costing variants:
    • ZL01 has a costing  type for upgrading the standard cost in legal valuation. It is configured as a cross company code variant (transaction OKYV) and accepts additive costs.
    • ZG01 has a costing  type for upgrading the standard cost in group valuation and accepts additive costs.

 

As I told I don’t have the possibility to test this scenario!!!!!!

Questions:

 

 

  1. 1. When I run the CK40N for the legal valuation (ZL01) is mandatory to run it at company code level? That means do I have to run the costing with two distinct runs: in CC X and then in CC Y. Perhaps the cross company costing function makes possible to run the costing in one shot: just one costing execution without indicating the company code in the CK40N getting all the material  across all the companies/plants costed in one shot?
  2. 2. The same question for the group costing. When I run the costing with the ZG01 is mandatory to indicate the company code or, this dimension is not relevant in the group costing perspective and hence one costing run calculates all the materials across all the plants?

 

 

Thanks!


↧
↧

Budget vs. Actual for investment order without tax amount

February 14, 2015, 2:47 am
$
0
0

Dear Expert,

 

Can you please help if there is any setting for the below mention query

 

1)      1st create Investment order thru t-code : KO01, Order type: AIO – Asset Internal Order

2)      2nd punch budget figure (nettoff taxes) against Investment Order thru t-code: KO22

3)      Run report – S_ALR_87013019

4)      Punch Investment Order against Asset thru t-code: AS01, Tab: Origin, Field: Investment order (created in step-1)

 

When we are looking at report against Investment Order – it shows 5 columns as written below:

 

Investment Order number

Budget amount

Actual amount

Commitment amount

Allotted

Available

Col-1

Col-2

Col-3

Col-4

Col-5

Col-6

t-code: KO01

T-code: KO02

MIGO

Raised PO / PI

Actual + Commitment

Budget – Allotted

 

Nettoff tax

  1. Incl. Taxes
  2. Incl. Taxes

 

 

 

is there any configuration setup, where we can show Actual amount (Col-3) & Commitment amount (Col-4) – nettoff taxes.

 

Regards,

Zafar

↧

Cost center report issue S_alr_87013611

February 14, 2015, 8:45 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

S_alr_87013611 report is showing Co. area currency & its respective object currency for cost center group.

I have seen that the exchange rate calculation for the transactions in this report is getting calculated based on OB08 table exchange rate which is configured in OKEQ & System calculating it correctly.

But at the same time, there are transactions in thise report having business transaction type KSII giving wrong calculation for the Co. area currency & Obj. Curr. exchange rate conversion. e.g. 1 GBP = 4.50 Eur

Attaching screenshot for the same.

wrong exchange rate calc.PNG

Please suggest.

↧

Direct Posting on the Sales Order item (SO not cost object)

February 15, 2015, 3:35 am
$
0
0

Dears

 

Some time back I had raised a query regarding the SO as cost object.

I got several comments that if the SO is not a cost object, we cannot make any cost posting (eg. material consumption) directly on the SO.

 

But now I tried to post a direct material consumption with SO in the FI document and the system posted the document even though I did not give any other cost object like cost centre, internal order, etc.

 

If the SO is not a cost object, why the system allowed to post the document ?

 

Please see the screenshot of the requirement class and the 'consumption' check box is blank. (I was told that 'consumption' check box should be ticked if the SO is a cost object.)

 

Please advise me.

 

ReqClass.PNG

↧

Re: Cost Centre in the PM Order Settlement

February 16, 2015, 4:55 am
$
0
0

Which cost centre the system would pick up in the Settlement rule ?

Is it manual or automatic ?

↧
↧

Re: Cost Centre in the PM Order Settlement

February 16, 2015, 5:14 am
$
0
0

Hi

It depend on if you define in pm order to create settlement rule automatic or to create it manually..

simply he tooks the cost center in the location tab in the pm order which he drived from equipment master data..

regards

mahmoud el nady

↧

Re: Cost Centre in the PM Order Settlement

February 16, 2015, 5:35 am
$
0
0

Hello Elnady,

 

Have u maintained default Cost Centre in the settlement profile? and also Check the settlement profile in the order type.

 

In the settlement Profile valid receivers can be Cost Centre, Material, Assets etc.

 

Maintenance order generally hit PM Work Centre. Let me put it clearly, so that you can decide which cost centre should actually be assigned to maintenance Work Centre.

 

Every Machine is assigned to a Cost Centre. Cannot Create a Machine/Work Centre with out assignment of Work Centre. Work Centres creation is a part PP consultants. But when we talk about PM Work Centres which is having Equipment and referred to PP Work Centres in total or part of a machine based on maintenance and importance of each part of the Machine.

 

In simple, without creation of PP Work Centres cannot able to create PM Work Centres. What ever Cost Centre maintained in PP Work Centre , will be same as PM Work Centre.

 

Asset Master, Equipment Master, Work Centre will flow in one Boat. All these Masters will hold same Cost Centre.

 

Here no need to create a separate Cost Centre for PM Maintenance. When Notification is created automatically Asset, Work Centre and Cost Centre will be assigned. When u do settlement of the PM Order, then automatically Values flow respective Cost Centre.

 

Regards,

Ismail.

↧
Search

Re: Actual cost of a product

February 16, 2015, 5:44 am
↧

Re: Direct Posting on the Sales Order item (SO not cost object)

February 16, 2015, 5:51 am
$
0
0

Nikki

 

Go to Va02/03 and check procurement tab where you find req type ...please see what has been defined..

↧
↧

KKP6- Values -GL account

February 16, 2015, 6:06 am
$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

I have a question in KKP6 report.

When I run the KKP6 report for one of the cost object, there were some values which are seems to linked to a cost element, but the cost element and actual values are not in the same line, and there is no object such as cost cetner, order etc.. opposite to the value in the report.

So how we can track the origin of these values, do we have any other drill down report from where we can see origin of these values.



Thanks

Babu.M

↧

Re: Cost Centre in the PM Order Settlement

February 16, 2015, 6:19 am
$
0
0

Hi Nikki

 

It will pick CCtr defined in Work center and in turn work center defined in functional location/sub-location where costing is defined as relevant....so basically all these parameters is defined by PM consultant as per process requirements.

 

Settlement profile only define settlement rule where receiver cat is defined....

↧

Re: Cost center report issue S_alr_87013611

February 16, 2015, 6:26 am
$
0
0

Hello, please check transaction RPC0, make sure what currency are you using for your reports.

 

When your controlling area currency is different from object currency you need to do this in order to see correct information. If you are using parallel valuations you also need to  select the rigth valuation at the selecction of the report.

 

Hope to help.

↧
Viewing all 8508 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>