Hi
Yes...then check the steps told
Kamal
Hi
Yes...then check the steps told
Kamal
Dear expert
Scenarion: Repetitive Manufacturing
after wip settlement posting through KK87 system passed a entry wip A/C----dr wip changes A/c----cr
In Define Posting Rules for Settling Work in Process (OKG8) we are maintaining one P/L G/L & one B/S G/L.
Question1: after wip settlement posting system post this entry in these two G/L whatever we maintaining in OKG8
Question2: how Cost element 22 category (External settlement) come in to picture
Dear Experts
I have opened Aug15 using MMPV on 31st July.
After that when costing team try to run costing for a product on 31072015, it was giving error during release of the same (CK24)
ERROR:Company code xxxx : period closing has not yet taken place
I wanted to know one thing if i opened MM Period (aug15-period 5) on 31st July,15, will SAP allow run the costing for July since System date is still July (31072015). if YES, then why i got the above error.
Also would like to know that is there any harm/disadvantage in opening future MM period on previous day of the next month (as this case)
Pl advice
Thanks
Venu
Hi Gurus,
We are using TAXINN, Due to Service tax changed from 12.36% to 14% we made a control in FV11 as per validity period (i.e) from till 31.05.2015 as 12.36% and 01.06.2015 to 31.12.9999 as 14%. In Receivable case the service calculation is not calculating at the time of Service Entry Sheet, In Non-Receivable case it is happening. also in MIRO level both Rec and Non-Rec is working fine.
Kindly provide some solution regarding my issue.
Dear Pooja,
Thanks for your replay. Let me check it out the SAP Note.
Thak You.
Hi
Check you settlement rule.
If you select Full settlement in settlement type, need to maintain 100% in the distribution rule.
Otherwise
change the Settlement type
Regards,
Pavan Kumar Arvapally
Hi,
We use a batch job to post billing docs to accounting (same program as VFX3 t code). Recently we have introduced a new SD discount condition to pricing.
If a billing doc with that condition is posted manually to accounting (VF02) then the condition posts to its respective COPA value field correctly.
However if we post similar billing doc through batch job only this condition is not posted to its value field.
It is really baffling as i cant think of any customization that can affect this.
Am I missing a trick here? Any advise would be appreciated.
Thanks
Abhijit
Hi,
Please check the condition type - Value filed assignments in KE4I.
It is better to go with a new condition type if there is a change in pricing procedure.
Regards,
Pavan Kumar Arvapally
Hello,
We have recently activated Business Function LOG_EAM_OLC and set up the relevant configuration of Order Type and Plant to allow the creation of a settlement rule at each operation within a PM order.
I have created a single PM Order with 5 operations and created a PM confirmation against each Operation to post Actual Costs against each operation. For each Operation on the PM Order we are settling to a WBS.
The issue appears to be with using KO8G - mass settlement. We have previously used a variant for report RKOSEL00 and we have populated a value of WBS in the Account Assignment Category field within the Settlement Receiver (Settlement Rule) selection.
When using transaction KO8G with the WBS value in the variant, the PM Order is not found. However when the value WBS is removed from the variant the PM Order is found and settlement will be run.
I have searched SAP Notes in this area but I could not find anything specific - has any one come across this issue before and if so how was this issue resolved?
(A simple solution would be to remove the WBS from the variant but I am curious as to why this has now stopped mass settlement of PM Orders where OAA has been activated!!)
Regards
Gary B
Hi Pawan,
Just wanted to know, if You contacted Vertex and got any updates for this?
Regards
SR
Dear Experts,
I have a raw material, we use it in many finished products we were use it without any problem but i had an info message in cost estimate that I have to set with quantity structure indicator for it so i set this indicator but after that when we consumed all the stock the raw material price became zero so I want to if this is because this indicator and if yes how can i solve this issue.
Note: material with average price.
Thanks
Ahmed Nassar
Hi
Not able to understand your query. Kindly re-frame with example/screen shots, so that we can extend help.
Rajneesh
dear Rajneesh thanks for your reply
my issue in brief that after I set the quantity structure indicator for raw material and we consumed all the stock of this material in production the material price became zero and before the last issue this material had price.
thanks
Nassar
Dears,
What would be the impact if i perform the settlement of production orders (KO88/CO88) in the middle of the period? And how about when i perform the settlementof of the second half (the oficial closing) ? It will be necessary to reverse the first settlement?
Does it make sense to perform this settlment in half period?
I am asking it, because we have too many issues on the oficial settlement (at period end) and we want to eliminate some issues (decrease issues) for a faster closing.
Thanks in Advance
Regards,
Hello Pavan,
I want format the same with KKBC_ORD but one more column for Production Order
Hi,
It is better to get the report from ABAP end.
To bring PO through is some what difficult.
Regards,
Pavan Kumar Arvapally
Dear Pavan,
I knew it's very complicated if develop a report like KKBC_ORD, so i want to know if we can reuse somethings like KKBC structure or KKBC program
Hello Experts,
Please find our client issue and throw some light.
1. GL Code GL Name
(a) 24825000 RG23C ADC
(b) 24860000 Cenvat RG23C ADC
When we run J2IUN, AED values are not appearing. If we select sub transaction type "IP" then GL 24860000 (b) values are appearing for utilization.
but GL "24825000" values are not appearing which has to be.
Please find our configuration for the same
1. GLs Configuration for "RG23C AED"
2. Excise accounts per excise transaction configuration.
3. Utilization Determination cofiguration
As per above configuration when we run J2IUN transaction please find below screen appearing without AED in duties tab.
Please provide further inputs to resolve this issue.
Regards
Pothana
Hi Avinash,
Go to the table J_2IACCBAL and press F4 on register, here check whether RG23 AED element exist or not.
Regards,
Mukthar
hi,
But segment was not given manually here. The transactions are auto postings from FCV. What are the settings I should check here. Have checked for substittutions. Nothing exists. U mean to say we should implement the particular BAdi?? Am a bit confused here.
Regards,
Sharmila