Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP ERP Financials - Controlling
Viewing all 8508 articles
Browse latest View live

KE30 copa Balance is out of sync with F.01

$
0
0

Hello Experts,

 

   Seek your advice on the ke30 balance out of sync with F.01.Total revenue before tax,Net Revenue,COGS-Manufacturing/traded, COGS(Inclu Freight), Gross profit,Total selling &admin expenses, Profit Before tax Values in FI and Co does not match with each other. We are implementing Batch splitting . Where should i start debugging? I have checked the record type F for this in KE24 and it fetched around some thousands of records.Is there any note to implement?  Please throw some light over this issue. I would really appreciate your inputs by assigning points.

 

 

Cheers,

Hemanthkumar.Ch


Re: Usage of different acitivity types causing over-absorption on cost centres in Plan

$
0
0

Hi Roberto,

 

If your business model allows to have 2 separate cost centres: one of activity type A and one for activity type B, that would probably be a cleaner solution.

Example:

ACT-A is allocated from CC-A

ACT-B (manual price) is allocated form CC-B.

 

First you plan your cost on CC-A (no costs planned on CC-B), manually enter price for ACT-B and run KSCB.

After KSCB you'll have credit entry on CC-B.

Create end execute assessment cycle allocation 100% from CC-B to CC-A. That will post negative debit on CC-A.

After that execute KSPI. ACT-A price will be calculated as Total planned costs minus debit from assessment cycle.

 

If you have to stick with one CC the only way to solve it is to post additional credit to CC (equal to the amount allocated via ACT-B) run KSPI and reverse the credit. So your approach is correct!

 

The only suggestion would be automating posting and reversing additional credit to CC.
Instead of manual entry you may try to use costing sheet.

 

After KSBC execute overhead allocation on your major projects (receivers of ACT-B) based on value of ACT-B and crediting CC. Execute KSPI and reverse overhead allocation.

Regards,

Szymon

Re: KE30 copa Balance is out of sync with F.01

$
0
0

Hello

Normally the value in KE30 report is not as same as F.01.

Please compare the line item between KE24 and F.01.

If you think there is incorrect value in KE30, please let us know which value is incorrect, why do you think it is incorrect.

 

Best regards,

Ronghua Fan

Re: Usage of different acitivity types causing over-absorption on cost centres in Plan

$
0
0

Hi Roberto

 

So far I understand, you have one CCxxx1 and 2 activity A & B for same CCxxx1. You want to allocate cost of B under fixed rate and from A by calculating activity rate.

 

To arrive at a solution I have few questions:

 

1. Are you making plan for both the activity in same CC based on activity dependant planning ie

KP26 and KP06 ?

 

2. Or only for activity for which you want to calculate KSPI?

 

I want to know with some example of your requirements because this is unique requirement. Many options are coming in my mind..please if possible give a detail process requirement.

 

 

Kamal

Re: What ML configuration  is required when  LOG_MM_SIT business function is implemented ?

$
0
0

Hello Ramesh,

 

I hope you are doing well, Have you found any solution? can you please share your material ledger configuration steps in regards to Log_MM_SIT business function module activation.

 

Thanks in Advance,

Supriya.

Overhead Calculation at Unit Costing Level

$
0
0

Hello All,

 

We have one requirement.

 

We want overhead calculation at sales order level. But requirement class costing method is 2. How can i proceed with this.

We want to charge different Overhead rates for different materials. As this set is maintained in Costing Sheet.

following is requirement class setting.

Capture 1.PNG

BR//KP

Re: Overhead Calculation at Unit Costing Level

$
0
0

Hi

 

You have to take Material/OH key combination in rate calculation  and assign in Material master

 

 

 

kamal

Re: Master Data Upload Mistake

$
0
0

Hi

 

If you have access in table level then take help from ABAP and delete Master data and relevant tax tables...

 

 

 

Kamal


Re: Break up for closing inventory as Matrerial and overhead

$
0
0

Hi.

I guess you can use the Rusia CCS report. If you need a specific layout, copy the report with the help of your abap. Check OSS:

 

1579535 - Complete materials report from ML splitted by cost elements

Target cost for input material is in the variance column

$
0
0

Hi,

 

Please take a look at the row in bold. Everything is right with this process order except the variance calculation. It is pulling in the target cost amount. Thoughts?

 

 

 

 

 

Cost Elem.Cost Element (Text)OriginMaterialTarget qtyActual Qty     Total tgt  Ttl actual     Variance    VarianceCrcyQty var.Price Var.     MxdPrcVarOutPricVar    Rem. var.Material
60515909Finished Goods Reclass2100/908717OXYCODONE BASE PURE WETCAKE, POB3-458.6-458.6-405,937.47-405,938.97-1.5-118.25USD00-116.76-1.50.01908717
60515913Consumption Issues, Actives Affiliates2100/1440Encapsulated Carbon Filter 16 in, Teflon6.92983,444.053,976.40532.35-3,444.05USD000001440
60515913Consumption Issues, Actives Affiliates2100/1401JJPac - FIBC-700 L1.7321204.72118.19-86.53-204.72USD000001401
60515913Consumption Issues, Actives Affiliates2100/13961-Butanol, Bulk1,003.791,143.402,128.042,424.01295.97-2,128.04USD000001396
60515913Consumption Issues, Actives Affiliates2100/2103Isopropanol, 99%, Bulk338.271429.878551.38700.7149.32-551.38USD000002103
60515913Consumption Issues, Actives Affiliates2100/2307Sodium Hypophosphite9.61410.172.175.753.65-72.1USD000002307
60515913Consumption Issues, Actives Affiliates2100/2070Acetic Acid, 56%, Bulk163.152172.02141.94149.667.72-141.94USD000002070
60515913Consumption Issues, Actives Affiliates2100/2088Sodium Hydroxide, 18%359.432324.53197.69178.49-19.2-197.69USD000002088
60515913Consumption Issues, Actives Affiliates2100/2089Sodium Metabisulfite1.73246.3114.568.25-6.31USD000002089
60515913Consumption Issues, Actives Affiliates2100/2180Sodium Hydrosulfite1.7321.845.395.720.33-5.39USD000002180
60515913Consumption Issues, Actives Affiliates2100/2284Catalyst, Palladium/Carbon5.5436979.31,060.0280.72-979.3USD000002284
60515913Consumption Issues, Actives Affiliates2100/1402JJPac - FIBC-185 L1.7320258.770-258.77-258.77USD000001402
60515913Consumption Issues, Actives Affiliates2100/2070Acetic Acid, 56%, Bulk00-2,364,457.3902,364,457.390USD00-2,364,457.3902,364,457.392070
60515915Cons Issues, WIP2100/906322nOxycodone, Base, Crude, NCOB463.363499.4365,431.03402,606.2937,175.26-365,431.03USD00000906322
Material-2,396,974.145,370.822,402,344.96-373,538.97USD00-2,364,574.152,364,457.40
95002041Machine Hours19066/MACH24.2513132,400.0041,708.959,308.95-32,400.00USD00000
Overhead32,400.0041,708.959,308.95-32,400.00USD0000
-2,364,574.1447,079.772,411,653.91-405,938.97USD00-2,364,574.152,364,457.40

Message No. GM052 - No activity type planning carried out for

$
0
0

Dear All,

 

I got an error as below when I run KP06 for Cost Center/Activity Type/ Cost Element eventhough I planned activity with cost center in KP26. Please help me fixed this error.

Thanks

 

No activity type planning carried out for 11000404/AT20

Message No. GM052

Diagnosis

You want to use sender cost center/activity type 11000404/AT20. However, activity type planning has not yet been carried out for this combination in controlling area  and fiscal year 2015.

System Response

You cannot use the sender cost center/activity type 11000404/AT20.

Procedure

Please carry out activity type planning for combination 11000404/AT20 first.

Re: Message No. GM052 - No activity type planning carried out for

$
0
0

Hi

 

This kind of issue generally happenes as there is no plan for the relaitve cost center/activity type/fiscal year. Can you double check it?

 

Regards, Feng

Re: Message No. GM052 - No activity type planning carried out for

$
0
0

Hi Feng Dong,

 

My master data valid from 01.01.2014.

I plan KP26 in 10.2015

Then I run KP06 in 10.2015 and I had error as above

Re: Message No. GM052 - No activity type planning carried out for

$
0
0

Hi Quang,

 

Can you give me the screen for the processing you did in KP26 also the steps you face the error in KP06?

Re: Activity type allocation on PCC in ratio of FG quantity produced

$
0
0

Hi Abhinav

 

 

1. How to do confirm the activities manually for PCC or REM? Which Tcode?

 

.......in MFBF  separately only activity backflash

 

 

2. Can we automate the calculation process so that we only enter the total hours consumed (not sure in which cost object we can enter this) and the system determines the ratio in which to allocate these to the PCC?

 

....... Then you have to develop a Zprogram and can make automated

 

 

Kamal


Change of Dummy profit center X to Y in Controlling area settings

$
0
0

Hello Experts,

 

My client requires to alter Dummy profit center in Controlling area settings from X to Y as it gets picked automatically if we dont provide any profit center under WBS client. The challenge is entries do exists already in table GLPCA with this Dummy profit center X.How can i alter the existing Dummy profit center to Y ? Is there any way to do this so that all the entries made henceforth should get routed to this Dummy profit center Y ?

 

Cheers,

Hemanthkumar.Ch

Re: Change of Dummy profit center X to Y in Controlling area settings

$
0
0

Hi,

 

Obviously, not (if by 'henceforth' you mean historical data). You can, of course, transfer the balances from old profit centre to a new one, either by PCA posting (9KE0) or financial transaction, but you cannot change already posted data. Be aware, though, that reversals done on previously posted documents will still touch old profit centre.

 

Regards,


Eli

Re: Change of Dummy profit center X to Y in Controlling area settings

$
0
0

Hi Eli,

 

Thanks for the quick reply. Henceforth mean in future. So you mean to say that it is not possible to change dummy profit center from X to Y. We could only able to transfer balances from old profit center to new profit center right ? Okay but here one more thing is , they have assigned Default profit center Y in 3KEH table . Does this have any impact  ? If so , suggest me the way to get rid of it ? Its urgent.

 

Cheers,

Hemanthkumar.Ch

Re: Change of Dummy profit center X to Y in Controlling area settings

$
0
0

Henceforth is ambiguous, could mean also 'as from that time'

You cannot change dummy profit centre if postings were made, though. However, my question is why would you. The definition of dummy profit centre can be easily overwritten by relevant settings in 3KEH.

WIP posting ignores functional area of underlaying production order

$
0
0

I've a production order that has a specific functional area assigned to it. When posting the previously calculated WIP during order stelltement the WIP posting goes ignores the functional area of the order and posts to the functional area of the WIP account.

 

How can I overrule the setting of the WIP account and make the system post to the correct functional area of the order?

 

Thank you and best regards

 

Andreas

Viewing all 8508 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>