message no CK870 while doing cost estimation in CK40N But when we do cost estimation in CK11N we are not getting this error.
M Srinivasa Reddy
Ph: 96202 70016
↧
message no CK870 while doing cost estimation in CK40N
↧
Re: WIP posting ignores functional area of underlaying production order
Hi...
Refer to below sap help description.
The system derives the functional area according to the following logic:
- The system derives the functional area from the master data of the assigned objects. If an object is assigned during a posting, the system checks whether a functional area has been entered in the master record of the object. The system retains this functional area. However, it may be overwritten by subsequent checks.
- The system derives the functional area from the master record of the G/L account or the cost element. The system checks whether a functional area is entered in the master record of the cost element or the P&L account. This functional area overwrites the functional area derived from the assigned object.
- The system derives the functional area via substitution for the component
Financial Accounting, Event 0005
. If a functional area has already been defined, this is overwritten with the functional area obtained via substitution. Definition of a substitution is necessary:- Where you are not able to enter a functional area in the master data of an object, for example business process or real estate objects.
- When you want to specify exceptions where derivation from the object should not occur.
↧
↧
Re: KE30 copa Balance is out of sync with F.01
hello Hemanthkumar.Ch,
I think it will be better that you can create one incident. Then we can log on your system to check why there is difference between SD-FI, SD-PCA.
Best regards,
Ronghua Fan
↧
Re: Target cost for input material is in the variance column
Hi
Have you done any GR against this process order. Pls do it and see.
Regards
Rajneesh
↧
Re: Profit Center to Copa Profitability Transfer
Hi Kamal Sir,
We have made KE30 Report when i go to see the Material Cost component, number of Line items Amount showing 0.00 Balance while we have seen user capture the Cost Center as well Profitability Segment like Profit Center given H111. why system not showing line item Amount.
Thank You!
Pranav
↧
↧
Re: Change of Dummy profit center X to Y in Controlling area settings
Hi Eli,
I meant Henceforth = In future 
. Its my client requirement and i m not aware why he wants to change. Anyway it is not possible right? I wonder is it possible to overwrite dummy profit center in 3KEH table having entries already? Kindly let me know the relevant settings to overwrite dummy profit center in 3KEH table with entries.
Cheers,
Hemanthkumar.Ch
↧
Re: Change of Dummy profit center X to Y in Controlling area settings
3KEH will define the profit centre for the relevant accounts. Also, you can have substitution in OBBH which will overwrite X with Y for the conditions you'll set or in all cases.
↧
Re: KE30 copa Balance is out of sync with F.01
Hi Ronghua Fan,
No test data in our system and moreover it is in production only. We already raised OSS to SAP.Once if i get solution , i will let you know . Thank you so much for your valuable inputs.
Cheers,
Hemanthkumar.Ch
↧
Re: Activity type allocation on PCC in ratio of FG quantity produced
Hi Kamal,
I would ideally want an indirect allocation. The trouble I am having is in conceptualizing how the original debits will be posted to a cost center. Once that is done, I can do indirect allocation to production orders. Any advice?
BR
Abhinav
↧
↧
Re: WIP posting ignores functional area of underlaying production order
Thank you, that really helped. With the new GL it is now Event 0006 where this can be triggered. We implemented a little exit that checks the FA on the order and finally could post to the correct FA.
BR
Andreas
↧
Re: Activity type allocation on PCC in ratio of FG quantity produced
Hi Abhinav
In Indirect activity allocation you have one sender CC but have single/multiple receiver CCs ..so here question is for labour cost you must have a CC Labour and your labour related cost to Labour Cost without any activity. Receiver will be Prod CC where you will allocate activity qty..system will consider Receiver activity= Sender activity at the time of price calculation of labour...but in your case you can't confirm any labour activity during confirmation of PCC..so how system will get PPC wise activity?
What you have told Labour related cost you can book by creating a CC as Labour...but how you allocate that cost proportionally to various PCC level through IAA..
By the way..have your PCC different prod CCs?
Kamal
↧
Re: Activity type allocation on PCC in ratio of FG quantity produced
Hi Abhi
There is one functionality (T.Code) CKMDUVACT, using which you can allocate the activity differences from CC to Individual Orders..
This is similar to CKMDUVMAT, whereby you first take the physical stock difference and then allocate the stock diff to all the prod orders whichever has used that material
I used it with Production Orders, but this should work with Cost Collectors too
You will first enter the activity differences from CKMDUVREC, I guess and then do CKMDUVACT.. I am sure there is some other config too.. You will find the config in the Material Ledger node.. But you don't need to activate ML inorder to use this
I am sure you can explore the basics from your side.. Feel free to let me know if you need any help
Template allocation is also an option
Regards
Ajay M
↧
Re: Target cost for input material is in the variance column
Hi Rajneesh,
yes, there has be a GR.
↧
↧
Reversing Reconciliation of ML/GL
Good day.
I am looking for a way to reverse the accounting made with Transaction CKMADJUST. I appreciate any insigths.
Regards
Juan
↧
Controlling area and company code
Hi All,
As i understand that we can assign a multiple company code to 1 controlling area but the main criteria would be FY should be the same ,
Q.1. is there any other criteria than FY same for all company code ?
Q2 .there are 3 company code, one is in India and another 2 is in different country {US and AUS } which needs to be assign to one controlling area is this possible ? if yes how this can participate in New GL concept as we know GAAP and IFRS requirement will be different.
Q3.Indian Company code can be leading ledger or Non leading ? if yes how this other company transaction take place while generating the report as per the NEW GL Concepts ?
Q4. on what basis leading ledger and Non leading concept will be defined or is there any Standard will follow or is this client decisions ?
Appreciate your response .
↧
Re: Procurement Process
Hi Ajya
This is fine , but if in case of moving average of Material and Stnd. Price Matrl situation how this can be hit in entry in MIGO and MIRO ?
↧
Re: Procurement Process
Hi,
As mentioned by Kamal, if price control is 'S' Standard it will go to PRD A/c instead of Stock A/c.
If 'V' Moving average price the will go to Stock A/c.
Regards
Ajay
↧
↧
Re: Procurement Process
Thank you Ajay .......
↧
Re: Controlling area and company code
Hi Nagraju
Q.1. is there any other criteria than FY same for all company code ?
...... Also same COA
Q2 .there are 3 company code, one is in India and another 2 is in different country {US and AUS } which needs to be assign to one controlling area is this possible ? if yes how this can participate in New GL concept as we know GAAP and IFRS requirement will be different.
...... Pre-requisites as per point 1. But you can create parallel Ledger in new GL with different FYV to fulfill US/AUS GAAP and IFRS
Q3.Indian Company code can be leading ledger or Non leading ? if yes how this other company transaction take place while generating the report as per the NEW GL Concepts ?
...... Which will be the main ledger that depends upon company's decision which one they want to make main CCode with leading ledger. When any transaction will happen in leading ledger, parallel posting also will happen in parallel Ledger only for statistically for reports purpose
Q4. on what basis leading ledger and Non leading concept will be defined or is there any Standard will follow or is this client decisions ?
...... suppose you have created L Ledger based on Indian CCode..so this will be main ledger for all other CCodes also..But you can create N L Ledger for other two companies for capturing data as per requirements to support your GAAP and IFRS fulfilments
Kamal
↧
Re: Controlling area and company code
Thanks KUmar for your reply
for 3rd question Ans:
" When any transaction will happen in leading ledger, parallel posting also will happen in parallel Ledger only for statistically for reports purpose"
is this LL will also make posting to NLL ? on what basis will it happen for NLL simultaneously
as its different CC how this will data will get updated ?
if its updated its should be Inter company transaction , without this circumstance if its updated it will not be the right procedure correct ?
plz correct me if i am not right ....
↧