Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List - SAP ERP Financials - Controlling
Viewing all 8508 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Re: Table for CO/PS plan values on company code level

April 27, 2016, 9:08 am
$
0
0

I already have a report painter over Library 6P3 with working company code filtering.

 

Example:

 

1 WBS-element 8001.12345 in company code 8001 and controlling area 8000 - plan value 1.000 €

1 WBS-element 8002.45678 in company code 8002 and controlling area 8000 - plan value    500 €

 

When I select controlling area 8000 + company code 8001 I get 1.000 € in the report.

When I select controlling area 8000 + company code 8002 I get    500 € in the report.

 

So the report with company code selection works fine with the standard library 6P3.

But which tables are behind this library?

(The same with library 1VK for cost centers and library 6O1 for orders)

↧
Search

Re: Cost element category 1 for income GL's

April 28, 2016, 3:49 am
$
0
0

Hi Mala

 

Cost Element with Category 1, can flow from FI to COPA. I would disagree with what Mustafa said above. If you are OK with this flowing to COPA directly, default PSG in OKB9 (OR) Post it in a CC and then KEU5

 

For a Cost Element Catg 11/12 to flow to COPA from FI, you need to populate PSG in GL line item

 

So, for Realized Gain/Loss Account, I think you can directly post to COPA with CE Catg 1

 

Ajay M

↧
↧

Re: Cost element category 1 for income GL's

April 27, 2016, 4:13 am
$
0
0

Hi Malathi

 

Value flow from FI to COPA is possible when Cost element category is 11 or 12.

 

Considering the scenarios above, following is expected:

1) In this case, values will directly flow to COPA, provided there is a setup for okb9 (Default PSG), KEI2 (PA Transfer Structure) available.

2) Value may flow to copa if PSG is maintained

3) Value may flow to copa if PSG is maintained

 

 

COPA Assessment using Assessment Cost Elements of Category 42, by which value would flow to COPA.

 

Hope its clear

 

Regards

 

Mustafa

↧

Re: Cost element category 1 for income GL's

April 28, 2016, 4:18 am
$
0
0

Hi Ajay

 

I agree with Ajay's disagreement. Tested to see it for real.

Statement corrected above to avoid confusion for others.

 

Regards

 

Mustafa

↧

Re: Deriving Material Code from Profit Center in CO-PA

April 28, 2016, 4:31 am
$
0
0

Many thanks Ajay and Mustafa for all your help.

↧
↧

Re: Check File Copy Printing Twice

April 28, 2016, 5:24 am
$
0
0

Dear Godfrey,

 

The reason why you are having double copy of your payment check can be two reasons.

 

Follow them below and check in your programs:

 

1st) The print form in FBZP is designed to print two pages in the SAPScript layout.

 

1.png

 

Check the Form layout if it´s setup to print double pages. You can ask an ABAP to check that for you since it´s a little bit complicate to understand SAPScript.

 

2nd) Maybe your program ZFRTR0021_RFFOUS_C it´s a copy from standard program RFFOUS_C with some particular changes.


- Check if your Z program is using the same way to print the check as the standard program RFFOUS_C. To do that, check with your ABAP or debugging this program and verify if the perform of SCHECK is being done as the following line code of standard program RFFOUS_C:


1.png



If yes, this perform calls include RFFORI01, FORM scheck which use the form configured in the FBZP showed in the 1st analysis using the parameters option  itcpo


The parameter options of this table ITCPO include the number of copies:



1.png



The definition of this option parameters is done by SAP include RFFORI99 in the form  fill_itcpo.


Check if your program Z is calling RFFORI01 or another Z program. If your Z program is calling the standard program the option of Number of Copies in ITCPO parameter table is defined as 1 always:


1.png


Try to change and test using the standard program RFFOUS_C and if double copy is printed, so I think that the 1st option may be your help.


Best regards,


Gabriel Coleti

↧

Re: Production Order Closing Issue

April 28, 2016, 8:25 am
$
0
0

Hello SAPFICO

 

The current period in MM can be checked with transaction OMSY.

 

 

This error leads to customising OB52 (an FI customising). This may be

the cause of the problem (period setting/closing from the FI side).

As per the error message long text:

The error can have several causes. In order to eliminate the error,

proceed as follows:

  o  Check whether the posting date was entered correctly. The system

     determines the posting period by means of the date.

 

 

  o  Check whether the required posting period is open for posting for

     the variant of posting period xx and account type xxx. Make sure

     that the period is open for posting.

     To do this, specify a period interval in which the required period

     for the variant of posting period xx and account type xxx is

     contained.

 

 

Please refer to note 20653 also.

 

regards

Ray

↧

Re: Authorization object K_KA09_KVS

April 28, 2016, 8:28 am
$
0
0

Hello Marco,

 

Object K_KA09_KVS is actually intended to check the authorization for

customizing changes in a version. Activities 2 (Change) and 3 (Display)

therefore refer to the maintenance of the version itself and not to the

change or display of transaction data in the corresponding version.

 

 

For planning it is only possible to generally assign activity 72, that

is, it is not possible at the version level to distinguish between

displaying and changing data.

 

 

With SAP *Note: 425703 you could set the activity to 02 or 03 for

authority object K_KA09_KVS and depends on what transaction code you use

you could change or display the manual planning.

 

 

(And not to the planned data in this version).

 

 

You may also like to take a look at the authorization object K_CSKB_PLA

(Across the versions).

 

 

Please also refer to the hint on the authorisation object K_KA09_KVS

in SAP *Note: 159408.

 

regards

Ray

↧
Search

Re: Negative Planned Costs & Actual costs while executing KKA2

April 28, 2016, 8:36 am
$
0
0

Hi Mustafa,

 

I get into OKG5 setup but couldn't visualize what you are trying to advice me.If you can explain in detail hope i will get it.

 

We have COS values from 09th period of fiscal year 2015 up to 1st period of 2016 and cross checked the value flow but couldn't get any clues from that.

 

And from the initial period itself the result analysis is saying the project is going for loss as most of the costs are hitting the POC loss account.

 

I am uploading the screen shot of OKG3 config. for FNBL status only.

 

Please review and share your thoughts.

 

OKG3.PNG

Regards,

Ram

↧
↧

Scrap not getting calculated during Parallel sequencing

April 28, 2016, 8:36 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

For the first time, we implemented Parallel processing, where the scrap quantity is entered in one of the Sequence.

and the scrap is confirmed.

But when we execute KKS2 there is an error message KV161 " WIP or scrap calculation for parallel operation sequence not possible"

 

As per the SAP procedure

If you want to calculate scrap or WIP, donot define parallel sequences.

 

Can any one guide how to fetch the scrap quantity in parallel processing.

 

Thanks,

Jagadish

↧

Billing Plans-Milestone Billing COPA Quantity & Cost

April 28, 2016, 9:28 am
$
0
0

I setup a sales order with a billing plan (milestone billing) using SAP's standard billing plan (01).  Everything works fine, but our finance people do not like the way the COPA documents are posting.  All the cost and all the quantity in the COPA document is posted on the first invoice that is created.  Subsequent invoices have zero cost and zero quantity.  Revenue is posted in each invoice based on the billing plan.

 

We would like the cost and the quantity to be posted on the last invoice.  Is there a semi-standard way of doing this?


Thanks

Tom


First Invoice COPA Document

COPA1.png

Second Invoice COPA Document

COPA2.png

Billing Plan

Billing Plan.png

↧

Re: Actual Activity Breakup

April 29, 2016, 3:48 am
$
0
0

Hi ,

 

Double click the amount ' 549,317 ' and select ' Cost Center :Actual Line Item ' report from the screen. This will take you to the break down of the amount. In the break down report , choose from the 'Change Layout '  button  "Partner Object '  and CO  Partner Object description' fields . These should be process order number and represent the material . Sorting and subtotaling on this  will give you the material wise break up.

 

Hope this help!

 

Regards

Adnan

↧

Re: Cost settlement for various scenarios

April 29, 2016, 3:53 am
$
0
0

Thanks Sunil, that cleared my doubt.

↧
↧

Re: Link to controlling documents from HR module

April 29, 2016, 3:54 am
$
0
0

Hi Malathi

 

For KSB5 / KSB1, you can refer to following tables COBK & COEP

 

Regards

 

Mustafa

↧

Re: Actual Activity Breakup

April 29, 2016, 4:05 am
$
0
0

Hi Nitisha

 

In addition to the solution provided above, within KSB1 (Line item report for Cost Centers), you can also explore adding a custom field for Material.

 

You may please refer to the solution given on similar lines by Ajay in the below mentioned thread

 

http://scn.sap.com/thread/2042783

 

Regards

 

 

Mustafa

↧
Search

Re: How to fix manually an exchange rate in KB15N ?

April 29, 2016, 5:13 am
$
0
0

I Agree with Fernando

 

Default system takes M for actual transactions. Unless you make code changes, it wont be possible

 

Ajay M

↧

Re: Material Ledger - Revaluation of Consumption (CKMLCP)

April 29, 2016, 5:33 am
$
0
0

Hi Ajay & Pavan,

 

 

 

Thank you very much for replying to my queries:

 

 

 

I know that Revaluation at Actual Prices (MFN1/ CON2) and Revaluation of Consumption in CKMLCP are mutually exclusive. If we run both then there will be double posting, this should not be done. I am clear on that.

 

 

 

Assume: Price Determination is set as 3.

 

 

 

My questions are:

 

 

 

1. Whether During CKMLCP (Revaluation of Consumption) there will be any fresh posting on the production orders (which were already closed during CO month end) because of plan and actual price difference? OR this plan and actual price difference will be recorded/ collected only in Material Ledger? If there is no posting on order, this means no CO document is created, only FI & ML document is created. Is that true?

 

 

 

2. Variance: If nothing is posted on Order during CKMLCP revaluation, how Variance will be analysed? Because during order settlement (KO88/ CO88) the variance is posted to Variance GL. However, during CKMLCP (Post Closing) the same variance (through ML) is also loaded on inventory. How this is possible? The Variance is still in PL A/C and also loaded in Inventory (BS A/C)?

 

 

 

Regards,

Bijay

↧
↧

Re: Material Ledger - Revaluation of Consumption (CKMLCP)

April 29, 2016, 5:46 am
$
0
0

Hi Bijay

 

 

 

1. Whether During CKMLCP (Revaluation of Consumption) there will be any fresh posting on the production orders (which were already closed during CO month end) because of plan and actual price difference? OR this plan and actual price difference will be recorded/ collected only in Material Ledger? If there is no posting on order, this means no CO document is created, only FI & ML document is created. Is that true?

 

....  1. There will be no fresh posting in prd order

 

....  2. Yes, it will be only collected in ML and FI & ML doc will be created

 

 

2. Variance: If nothing is posted on Order during CKMLCP revaluation, how Variance will be analysed? Because during order settlement (KO88/ CO88) the variance is posted to Variance GL. However, during CKMLCP (Post Closing) the same variance (through ML) is also loaded on inventory. How this is possible? The Variance is still in PL A/C and also loaded in Inventory (BS A/C)?

 

 

....1. Here the diff coming from single/multilevel prod process will come not order lev which already taken care during order settlement..So variance is calculated at order lev (diff of actual debit and GR value). Here the diff is coming from mat consumed from one lev to other lev to make the diff available for posting at consumption and inventory propotionate and getting PUP (actual cost). So basically CKMLCP is a matrix calculation tool and not generating any addl PRD against order already settled and closed.

 

 

Kamal

↧

Re: Cost Center Substitution - KB21N

April 29, 2016, 6:57 am
$
0
0

Hi Justin.

Did you eventually manage to get this resolved. I have a similar requirement and was wondering if you substituted at allocation - sender or line items? Line items seems to only offer one cost centre and then I see why it was populating both sender and receiver.

 

Can you please advise how you actually achieved this substitution?

↧

Re: Cost settlement for various scenarios

April 29, 2016, 7:06 am
$
0
0

Just a remark, - settlement is not a prerequisite for Closing.  That is controlled by the Settlement profile.  And selecting a mandatory settlement option can be a mistake.  That sometime has no logic and only generates useless line items.  Specially for OPEX projects.

↧
Viewing all 8508 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>