This is very interesting I am finding such kind of error, can you please share your knowledge how to over come with this.....
Regards..
↧
Re: No postings can be made to profit center XXXXX in company code XXX
↧
Re: Material Ledger - Revaluation of Consumption (CKMLCP)
Hi
Adding points to my earlier reply
As explained earlier, there will be no effect to the production/process orders which were already closed during co month settlements.
CKMLCP effect is to the materials with the price determination "3".
Price differences/ exchange rate differences will get adjusted to these materials.
After adjusting we will get the new price, i.e Periodic unit price, it will be updated in the material master.
There will be no pup for the materials with price determination "2" - Transaction Based.
Regards,
Pavan Kumar Arvapally
↧
↧
Costing issue
Hello All ,
@Moderators:- This is very specific issue , I have searched a lot but did not get relevant/close answers to my query hence posting it .
Basic inputs :
- Finished as Price control – s (standard price)
- Raw materials – v (moving average price)
- Split valuation is active here for materials.
- No cost roll up is done for FG or semi-finished as They don’t Create the BOM initially as they are not sure of the components & its quantity that would be required for FG.
- FG & semi-finished material components in the BOM would also be of special stock or project stock.
- WE DO NOT USE ML AND DO NOT INTEND TO , THIS IS AN EXISTING SYSTEM AND WE HAVE TO STICK TO WHAT WE HAVE
Business Process :
We have project system and we create sales order with reference to Quotation . Each Sales order line item is assigned to WBS to sales order line items
Issue : currently GR is posted with wrong values after prod.order confirmation & VPRS Condition is not getting updated because sales order is not the cost object , project is the cost object.
Requirement :
- How to Calculate GR at actual cost
- How to get VPRS update with actual cost in the Sales order considering Sales order is not the cost object , project is the cost object.
Please advise
Thanks
Aryan
↧
Re: Costing issue
Hi Aryan
Without ML, we cant expect GR Valuation at Actual Cost
Since project is your Cost Object, I am assuming you are in MTO Scenario
If your BOM is determined at the level of Sales Order, you can calculate Sales Order cost estimate and GR gets valuated at that. Your Stock will be Sales Order stock
If your scenario is Complex MTO, then you can valuate it at Project Cost Estimate. Usually, SAP recommends to keep Non Valuated in this case. Complex MTO means design of the product starts after receiving Customer Order
If BOM cant be determined at that level, then the GR gets valuated at the Planned Cost of Production Order.
Your Requirement Class should have Valuation indicator as M and "W/o Val Strategy" must not be X
Ajay M
↧
Re: Retained Earnings
Hi,
Once you run the year end GL value carry forward, the net profit or loss will update to retained earnings account, as said the above we need to define this P&L wise.
If your getting the Net profit, it needs to add in the liabilities side of the B/S.
Regards,
Ravi
↧
↧
Re: Actual Consumption Quantity not showing in Reports.
Dear Srinatha
Material Origin is not selected for my material. Even then I can see the quantity for my other material in COR3. Please see below;
@ Dear Ajay M: I am getting the quantity from MB51 or from Order Line Item report. But why not I am able to see the quantity at order based report (i,e COR2, Cor3, S_ALR_87012993)?
Regards
Abbas
↧
Re: Actual Consumption Quantity not showing in Reports.
Hi Abbas,
The material origin flag is the only cause for your issue. In your screenshot, you are referring the header /SFG material. In that case, only for GR line (SFG material 101 movement), you can not see the actual quantity in COr3, S_ALR report. You can just double click on blank line and go to line item details to see the material and then you can check if those materials are activated with "Material Origin" flag or not.
If you still see any material that are updated the quantity with out "Material Origin", you can check the material history for changes- if someone made any changes to this field.
Hope this answers your question. Thank you!!
Regards,
Srinath
↧
differentiate same cost element in RRB
Hi All,
Is there anyway we can determine different materials for the RRB sales order even when they have same cost element.
the expense posting is coming from Concur system, so it does not contain anything other than cost element.
Is there anyway we can achieve this through Costing Sheet.
↧
Re: Actual Consumption Quantity not showing in Reports.
Dear Srinatha
In fact, when I double click on blank line and go to line item details, I see that material are updated with the quantity without "Material Origin" option selected.
Not sure how?
There are no materials history changes also.
Also, these are consumption entries and not GRN.
Let me know if you have any further input?
Regards
Abbas
↧
↧
Re: Actual Consumption Quantity not showing in Reports.
Hi Abbas,
I think there might be some confusion. When you double click on blank line items, you can see the quantity in line item details (MB51) for materials that are with out "Material Origin" flag. It is expected.
The quantity is not recorded only at COR3 and S_ALR reports for materials that are with out "Material Origin" flag.
You gave the header material screenshot, that's why I confirmed it is for GRN.
I think it would be easy to prove quickly by posting one transaction with and with out flag in your non production system. That explains how this indicator is impacting your reporting.
I can strongly believe "Material Origin" flag is the only cause in this case.
Once the testing is done and you are comfortable with the results, please confirm if it is addressed. Thank you!!
↧
Report to compare Material Cost Component Plan Vs Actual
Hi experts,
Are there standar reports to compare Material Cost Components Plan (CK11N) vs Actual (Material Ledger),
Individual and masive reports?
Thanks in advance.
José Luis
↧
Re: Report to compare Material Cost Component Plan Vs Actual
Hi Jose Luis,
You can view the standard/plan (Preliminary valuation) vs actual valuation by components through
CKMLQS for individual material. There is no massive report as I am aware.
Hope this helps.
Thank you!!
Srinath
↧
Re: Report to compare Material Cost Component Plan Vs Actual
I second Srinath's opinion
You will need a Custom Report for the same
↧
↧
Re: [CO-PC-PCP] In CK40N, what is the use of Plant in selection Screen and Dynamic Selection
Am of the same opinion!!
↧
Re: COPA Planning Framework - monthly layout
Please close the thread, if resolved
↧
BAPI_ACC_STAT_KEY_FIG creation of one document only
Hi,
I am reposting a topic about this as I never got my issue solved. I am creating a LSMW with BAPI but I would like to create only 1 document and not as many documents as the lines to be updated. I was told to create to different files, but in a structure the header and line items have the same level in the hierachy...
how can I obtain only 1 document no. ? In theory I should be able to have a proportion 1 doc.no. : N line items ... but how can this structure allow me to do so?
Please help 
thank you
BR
Salvatore
↧
How to change Zpc2 to Zpc1
hai friends
I have released the cost estimation wrongly Zpc2 as costing variant and cancile the estimate re run ck11n with zpc1.
Go to Ck24 marking allowance that material it is taking zpc2 . how to change in to zpc1.
↧
↧
Re: How to change Zpc2 to Zpc1
Hi Soma
Use FM CK_F_FVMK_POSTING to reset the Costing Variant
Put Valuation = 0 / BUKRS = Your Company Code / POPER = Posting Period in Question
BDATJ = 2016 / BWVAR = Valuation Variant of the Costing Variant you want now /
TVERS = 00 / FREIG = X (Or Try with Blank)
Once you execute (F8), it will be reset in Ck24 and then you can modify the Marking Allowance in Ck24
↧
WIP Calcuation
Hello SAP Gurus,
While running WIP Via KKAO it is picking those production orders which have status as CLSD ( I.e Closed)
Is there configuration missing as ideally it should not run for such orders.?
Regards
sapfico
↧
Re: WIP Calcuation
If it really happens that way, you should raise SAP OSS message
Ajay M
↧