There is some thing error in user exit. In the exit if you have not maintained any GL, then it will consider all GLs. So check with your ABAPer, they will help you.
↧
Re: Cost Center appearing in non cost-element GL while simulating MIRO?
↧
Re: Standard cost estimate is not getting deleted through CKR1
Hi,
Though it is a very old post but I had similar issue & would like to update the solution for others benefit.
While executing CKR1, if you explod the selection screen, I have assigned or by default another plants lay out was defaulted there. Because of that, the deletion was not occurring. once I removed it, the it worked.
Thanks,
Pulak Das
↧
↧
Re: How to create period based planning in account based COPA
Hi...
You create planning layout using t-code kei4 as below picture.
After you execute t-code KE11, you input your planning layout and input your plan data as below picture.
↧
CATS TImesheet - maintain activity rates
Hi
I am not very familiar with this topic. I was told that CATS timesheet expects activity type to be maintained at employee level (Infotype 0315). Based on activity rate, the timesheet credits employees home cost centre and debits receiver cost centre.
If that were so, how practicable is it to maintain activity rates for each employee. For an organisation with tens of thousands of employees, it is impractical. Even if we decide to limit the number of activity types, there could be 1000's of cost centres that employ people. So potentially, activity type times cost centre combination of activity rates.
Maintaining activity type at employee level is a massive job because employee might move to different positions temporarily (i.e. different activity type) and annual promotions etc will cause a bigger maintenance job.
Could someone please let me know what is the most practicable way to maintain activity types/ rates to achieve a cost allocation to receiver cost centre?
Thanks
Rajesh Shanbhag
↧
Re: Accounting Entry in ML AVR RUN (CKMLCPAVR)
Hi Chhandak
your flow of entries is correct
If the delta of 100 is to be carried forward to Higher Levels, then you will have the PRY/PRX involved
Ajay M
↧
↧
Re: error in ff_5
Dear Ravi,
You use the Multi cash format for the electronic bank statement. If field 12 (period from) or field 13 (period to) in a line of the Auszug.txt file does not contain a valid date, the sytem generates a termination (error message FB080).
If you are in ECC 5 above better to raise OSS.
Regards
Mani Kumar
↧
Re: error in ff_5
Thank you
manikumar
but it not posting
regard
ravi
↧
Re: error in ff_5
refer OSS note 148532
522759
2071084
↧
Decimal places are not permitted in Co product apportionment structure
Hi Experts,
Could you pls help me in below issue,
where my user wants to enter either percentage for Co product with 2 decimal or increase digit of equivalence number,but as a Standard functionality system is not permitting us enter decimals or increase the number of equivalence and getting below error message.
Decimal places are not permitted
Message No. 00011
Is there anyway to enter decimals or increase the equivalence number???
Awaiting & appreciate your quick response.
Thanks,
chandu.
↧
↧
Re: error in ff_5
you have to defined the External transition type FTRF in your configuration . It missing where the mapping done in Transaction OT83
↧
Re: error in ff_5
Hi
Are you assigned FTRF to Posting rule in Global settings as mentioned configuration
↧
Re: Decimal places are not permitted in Co product apportionment structure
which Transaction code you are using
↧
Re: Decimal places are not permitted in Co product apportionment structure
Hi Preeti,
We are using MM02.
↧
↧
Re: Negative Planned Costs & Actual costs while executing KKA2
Hi Mustafa,
I have checked the OKG5 set up and 5 series GL/CE (Sales Commission) has been mapped to the COS line ID and it has been mapped to CE category 12 as you mentioned.
We are facing this problem for this single WBS , we aren't facing any issues for other WBS elements.
Furthermore i am analyzing on the manual changes to the RA.
Kindly let me know the next step on how to proceed on this issue.
Regards,
Ramprakash V
↧
Re: COPCP005 with Group Currency
Hello Johannes,
could you explain how to use the table EXP_PRICE_COMPONENTS_TABLE ?
I've added two lines:
Example:
TPREIS PREFIX KSTAR HRKFT LTEXT
9.50 9.50 400000 empty Price
2.00 2.00 403000 empty Special Additiv Costs
Normal Price at materialmaster is 8.00 EUR - so userexit works.
In CK11N at Detail view (at the bottom of the screen) it shows 11.50 EUR for this material (so it is adding).
But 11.50 are complety added to cost element 40000 in Detail view
Where can the user see the 9.50 and the 2.00 EUR in CK11N ? Or in a protocol?
↧
Re: error in ff_5
hi preeti
after changing in to + same problem
Regard
ravi
↧
COPA data not flowing at Sales Order Creation
Dear Friends,
We are trying to flow data from sales order creation to COPA .
When I went to T-code KEKF, it is already activated in our controlling area and operating concern.
But when we are saving a Sales order with Valid Condition Types maintained in Ke4i, the COPA document is not getting generated.
I believe it has been stopped at the back end using the ABAP Code.
Please help me understand, which all points/User exits should I check for this.I have already checked COPA0005, it not getting triggered at creation of sales order
Ajay Maheshwari SAP Trainer Sir Could you please guide, if you have faced any such scenario.
Regards,
Sapan Agarwal
↧
↧
Re: COPA_IST number ranges change
Thanks, closing this tread now!
↧
Return of parts after TECO
Hello Gurus,
We have an issue wherein users are returning parts on production order after TECO status.
This is hitting inventory loss account and causing an issue with FI/COPA reconciliation in the month of return.
Could you please suggest best alternate way of handling it.
Regards,
MySAP
↧
Re: Period End closing - Product cost by order
Dear Expert,
Thanks for your valuable comment on this.
I am trying to below steps based on above information.
- Manual reposting of order balance to cost center using KB11N
- Creation of Dummy cost center
- Creation of new GL (COGM) and creation of new cost element category 22 (external Settlement)
- Doing this there will be no FI entry but there is CO document. In this case for this GL there will be FICO –Recon (no balance on GL and but Balance on CE)
- For identify order balance, I can use S_ALR_87013127 and field will be Total Act. Cost.
- If I used KB11N, then no need to execute KKS1 and CO88 for these orders.
- Only one thing is when we see the order cost analysis using CO03 the entry which we post using KB11N that will come under transaction “Miscellaneous” after Good Issue, Confirmation, Overhead, Miscellaneous and Goods Receipt. Entry can be +/_.
- Once order balance will be zero, then we can use COHV for changing the status to CLSD. In this there might be some order which can be go for CLSD because of COOGI not cleared. So need to be correct first then again manual reposting then COHV.
- Once above step completed for order created on or before 31.03.2016, then we can use our regular product cost by order period end closing process. So that system will select the data for current fiscal year.
- Here the issue which I am facing for KB11n. I need to develop program with ref to KB11n for doing manual cost transfer order in lacs of numbers.
Is it right process which I am following, also is there any other program or bapi for KB11n.
Thanks once again.
Thanks
Akesh Agrawal
↧