Hi
Are you sure you have configured the external transaction type to the correct Transaction type in Below screen .
Please paste the complete screen shot and also Bank statement if you 
↧
Re: error in ff_5
↧
Return of parts after TECO
Dear Gurus,
We have an issue wherein users are returning parts for production orders which are already TECO few months back.
This is causing reconciliation issue between FI/COPA in the month of return as it is hitting inventory loss account (only in FI).
Is there a better way to handle the issue.
Regards,
MYSAP
↧
↧
Re: COPA data not flowing at Sales Order Creation
Hi Sapan
If you are sure its not suppressed in any exit, then check KE2B / KE2D /KE2C, if the Order is lying there in the Error Log, for any reason.. Once you clear the error, it should flow to COPA
Make sure you are checking the appropriate month in COPA, depending on in which period you update it (Period or creation or Period of delivery)
Ajay M
↧
Re: Why the CoCd and Plant assignment displayed under CCS (OKKN) in PPC1 is different than PPC2
Hi Rabi
PPC1 uses Costing Type 01 i.e. it can released to Std costs. Hence, you are supposed to Mask the Plants
For PPC2, you can specify the settings for each plant separately, because it does not use 01 Costing Type
Ajay M
↧
Re: Extend the down payment invoice functionality to other countries
Hello Jean-Pierre,
I've found out your message while looking for a down payment solution for European countries other than Poland.
Did you solve it?
If so, could you please share what you did?
Thanks a lot for any help on this topic.
With kind regards,
Flavio
↧
↧
Re: Missing Data: Profitability Segment
thanks for your reply Ajay, could you please provide some more clarity
some more clarity on my issue
Sales order created with 4 different material A, B,C D,before activating the copa A, B, C material delivered and billing also done.
after activate the copa the balance 1 material D i need to be delivered
here i have below query
1. I have to do the delivery and billing for the balance 1 material D through the same sales order
2. some scenario i have to be delete the 1 material D in my existing sales order
After i run the T code KE4F and i try to save the exiting sales thorugh va02 still i am getting the same error message Missing Data: Profitability Segment no.
Thanks
Sri
↧
Re: No Target Cost, since No GR
Hi
As per your statement "Users creating orders, issuing goods to order and technically closing it without GR from production order". In this case WIP entry can not be be passed at month end since in the month end order status is TECO. Only variance entry may have been passed at settlement and the order balance may have been Zero. So in the next month there is no balance in the order hence system is giving you correct message.
Kindly revert if any thing else is there?
Regards
Rajneesh
↧
Re: Production Order Settlement with error
Hi,
I also tried adding the fields in table V_CKMLMVADMIN as shown below but it did not work.
Key Date
KKEY KDATA
KO88_XRUEM X
Can you tell if these are the fields you updated in the table.
BR
Abhi
↧
CK122 - PP Order Settlement in previous period
Hi,
I am trying to settle PP orders in April which is a closed period.
I looked up SAP note 1135678 but it is not applicable for our EHP version and cannot be implemented.
I have still maintained the table CKMLMVADMIN as described in the note as shown below but I am still not able to settle the PP orders
Any andvice what can be done?
Key Date
KKEY KDATA
KO88_XRUEM X
BR
Abhi
↧
↧
Re: Accounting Entry in ML AVR RUN (CKMLCPAVR)
Thanks Ajay
Regards
Chhandak
↧
Re: CK122 - PP Order Settlement in previous period
Hi Abhi
This note works. It allows you to settle Prod Orders, Older than 2 months. I used it many times
Try to apply it or Raise SAP OSS message and ask them to provide you a similar note
Ajay M
↧
Re: CK122 - PP Order Settlement in previous period
Hi Abhi,
This note will applicable up to EHP 3 only, currently you are in which EHP version?
Regards,
Ravi
↧
Re: No Target Cost, since No GR
Ismail,
System wont create both WIP and variance for a single order at a time, as per your query above after goods issue, if you make your order status as TECO and DLV for the first period itself variance got calculated and nothing to calculate in the next month, if you calculates the WIP in the first period and if you change your order status in the next month, then system will reverse the previous period WIP and post the variance.
I am not sure why system calculated both WIP and variance in your case, to cross check i executed the same scenario from my end, but system behavior is as explained above.
Regards,
Ravi
↧
↧
PO status
Hello All,
What does Star means in PO status? In some PO’s it will appear and in some it doesn’t. Does Star means Po is not fully settle? How do we confirm that?
Please advise...
Thank you,
Nr.
↧
Re: Process Order settlement on cost center.....!!
Prasad
System always settled to MAT by default and no way to avoid in this case....
You can try by defining 2 rules...at MAT lev 0% and at CC lev 100%
Kamal
↧
Re: Budget GP12N
Hi Ajay , Tcode FAGLP03 helps me to view all the plan data that I loaded using GP12N ..
but how do I reverse the document number in case there is some incorrect plan numbers provided by business ?
↧
Re: Actual Costing Step- CON2
Hi Kamal,
If we take 1 is it will allow twice?
Ali Mirnia
↧
↧
Re: Activity Type planning is not updated in cost center report
Hi Kamal Sir,
Thank you for ur reply.
I have ticked excel integrated check box and overview box, the main problem is excel updated successfully but the plan values are not updated in cost center.
Thanks!
Venkatesh.
↧
Re: Activity Type planning is not updated in cost center report
Venkat
Then prob may be in parameter recording while creating generic file name and linked with excel upload file
Have your generic file properly assigned?
Kamal
↧
Re: Budget GP12N
Hi Aryan,
In SAP plan data will overwrite if you upload again, it will consider the recent upload.
Regards,
Ravi
↧