Akbar
If you take 1 then you have to revaluate at CON2 and don't tick revaluation in CKMLCP otherwise it may effect twice
Kamal
↧
Re: Actual Costing Step- CON2
↧
Re: Activity Type planning is not updated in cost center report
Kamal sir,
everything is done in the proper way, am unable to identify the issue.
↧
↧
Re: Activity Type planning is not updated in cost center report
venkat
Go for second attempt by deleting all steps in KP34 and try again
It may solve the issue
Kamal
↧
Re: Activity Type planning is not updated in cost center report
Hi Venkat,
Since you are getting the updated status OK, can you check once if anything is updated in COSL table.
You are not missing any steps, but may need to double check your planning layout and what data you are updating.
If not this should simple straight forward steps only, as final resort you can try once again in recreating them as Kamal suggested.
Thank you,
Srinath
↧
Re: Maintain OH rate without SPRO configuration by TR?
Hi Bryan,
Please create the costing sheet OH rates in your golden system, then instead of standard transport movement process, please open the target system and execute the program "RKAZUTR1" with transport request, "The successful execution of the report RKAZUTR1 is confirmed with Message KA444. All transported overhead rates are in the costing sheet of the target client, the transported table was cleared of these rates. The transport of the overhead rates has been closed successfully.
Let me know if you need any further help, for more details you can refer the note 164222 - INFO: Transporting overhead rates of the costing sheet
Regards,
Ravi
↧
↧
Re: Production Overhead to assign to product
Hi Sao
You have to follow total absorption process as I define below:
1.Create Individual OH CC like utility, indirect lab, etc with SCE
2. Allocate other CCs cost through Assessment cycle as per tracing factor (% or any other as per requirement) to OH CCs
3. So now you have individual OH cost to individual OH CC
4. Again allocate OH cost with SCE to prod CCs
5. In CCS define these individual OH SCE to see the cost product wise
Kamal
↧
Re: Production Overhead to assign to product
Hi Sho Ram,
Here are my inputs on how you can achieve this.
1- Plan all your direct and indirect overheads and perform the planning steps-allocate and assess the plant cost from non production cost centers to production cost centers. That way you should have all your direct and indirect overheads are part of your standard cost estimate.
2-Define your cost component structure by your cost elements and also activate primary cost component split.
3- For actuals, it should be the same procedure as plan. If you want allocate your plant general cost center variable cost based on production line labor hours, you can also leverage the template allocations. For fixed cost, you can directly use assessments.
4- Activate ML and Actual costing can be activated with 2- update activity relevant to price determination. That way you can achieve in absorbing the variances to product level during ML run.
This is very high level. Hope this helps you.
Thank you,
Srinath
↧
Re: Maintain OH rate without SPRO configuration by TR?
Hi Bryan,
Yes, it is achievable with out TR. Please refer the OSS note: https://launchpad.support.sap.com/#/notes/301665
Thank you,
Srinath
↧
Re: Missing Data: Profitability Segment
Hi..
If you execute t-code ke4t after select select "the Check for existing records" option,
you can transfer onlydocuments that have not already been imported into CO-PA.
↧
↧
Re: Activity Type planning is not updated in cost center report
Hi Kamal sir,
Actually, i have done wrongly KP75 planning layout. Now everything is fine.
Thanks!
Venkatesh.
↧
Re: Activity Type planning is not updated in cost center report
Hi Srinath,
Thank you for ur reply.
I have done wrongly KP75 Planning Layout, now its working fine.
Thanks!
Venkatesh.
↧
Re: Activity Type planning is not updated in cost center report
Hi Venkat
Nice that it is solved...
if you find any thing helpful from our advice please mark it helpful/correct and close the thread...
Kamal
↧
Re: Activity Type planning is not updated in cost center report
Ok sir,
Thank you.
↧
↧
Re: Message No. RW101-FI/CO interface: Reference key is not filled
Hi Mukthar,
yes, we really have some validation activated for the cocode in OB28, but why you think this will be the reason for the error?
Thanks and regards,
Annika
↧
Cutback intercompany mapping accounts
Hi Genius,
We have our own developped subsitution by functional area for G/L accounts, one primary cost element or account A subsituated to several accounts C,D,E,F... by different functional areas.
And we do the GJ26 to mapping the secondary cost element B inside of the cycle KSU3 to primary cost elements (Accounts) A, the system defaults the cutback receiver company code results accounts as the mapping account A in GJ26, but not the subsitution accounts C,D,E,F which subsitute A in our own subsituation development t-code.
I don't know whether this subsituation can not be processed, is that because the priority of GJ26 is higher than the user developped subsitution?
And we tried to use JVA standard subsituation GJBS to solve this problem, but standard subsituation can not subsitute the account but only related to CO objects , so can not be used.
The detailed steps for this problem as below for your reference.
1. GJ26 do the mapping to map the receiver company code receiving accounts
receiver company code -->secondary cost element B --> receiver account A
2. Do the subsituation developped by our own.
line item 1: receiver company code--> receiver account A --> subsituation condition (by functional area range 1)--> subsituated accounts C
line item 2: receiver company code--> receiver account A --> subsituation condition (by functional area range 2)--> subsituated accounts D
line item 3: receiver company code--> receiver account A --> subsituation condition (by functional area range 3)--> subsituated accounts E
line item 4: receiver company code--> receiver account A --> subsituation condition (by functional area range 4)--> subsituated accounts F
3. Do the KSU5 to assessment
4. GJCB to cutback the assessment to the receiver company code
The accounts used for assessment cutbacked to receiver company code is still A but not C,D,E,F
What we need is to Subsituated the account A to C,D,E,F in the cutback receiving company code.
Kindly please help,
Thanks and regards,
Annika
↧
Re: CKM3N ENding inventory Prices is wronlgy
Hi Reddyr
You read like below:
Opening inv = 16000
Add Receipt = 4212
*** Inv = 20212
Less CC = 556
End Inv = 19656
So..It is correct. You should not consider only Receipt..you have opening inventory also and other withdrawal from CC
Now I think you have understood... please close the thread
Kamal
↧
Re: KEKO-BWSMR not filled
Dear Villem,
This field is used to control the material valuation strategy for external procured components (Raw materials and purchased materials).
Check your material procurement type F - External procurement (Material Master Data View MRP - 2)
Best regards,
Gabriel Coleti
↧
↧
Re: KEKO-BWSMR not filled
Hi,
well yes its F ofcourse. Its the same material which I have problem with. In one case the value is populated and on the other time its not. I have done all masterdata checks and everything is identical except this one field with missing value.
↧
Re: KEKO-BWSMR not filled
Check your Material Valuation cost in CK13N.
The system record this field only if some Material Valuation was defined according to your Costing Variant:
↧
Report painter in COPA
Hello Experts,
I have a requirement to create a P&L report in COPA - where by I can derive profitability plant wise and product type.
Our COPA is costing based and every plant manufactures more than 2 type of products.
For instance, I have two products say X and Y in Plant ABC, where cost gets booked in one GL. But when I prepare P&L, I need to have the cost split shown between Product X and Product Y for plant ABC.
Please advise how to make it in COPA
Regards
Malathi
↧