I am not interested in Cleared documents. I want the list of documents that are not cleared due to Invoice surplus or GR surplus. I also want to match it with MR11 for go live.
↧
Re: For GR/IR account 211200. How to find Invoice amount and how to find GR amount.
↧
Re: For GR/IR account 211200. How to find Invoice amount and how to find GR amount.
Hi Raghu,
refer this link it clearly explains about MR11
http://scn.sap.com/community/erp/logistics-mm/blog/2012/03/08/impact-of-mr11-execution
Qty Var. Less Than/Equal To : 100 Percent. (I don't understand what this percent means)
Quantity variance Used to select all purchase orders in which the variance between the quantity delivered and the quantity invoiced is smaller than the specified percentage.
The system sets the smaller value of the quantity delivered and quantity invoiced to 100 % and checks whether the percentage difference is smaller than the percentage rate defined.
If you do not enter a percentage rate, the system does not limit selection with reference to the amount of the variance.
I hope it helps
Best Regards
Hrusikesh
↧
↧
Re: Report on Production Orders giving full details
Hi Rajneesh,
Devlop a Z program by copying SAP standard program RKKBCAL2.
or devlop a report using tables
mara, marc, keko, keph, s022, crco, crhd and
faglflexa, bseg
Also carefully refer Note 52678 and refer relevant other notes.
Best regards
Hrusikesh
↧
Re: Handling Cost Centers with No Transactions
Hi,
Before deactivating or deleting cost centers, a process that I do is to check the "Where-Used Lists".
KS03 - Enter cost center
Select Environment > Where-Used List.
You can check to see if the cost centers are in any settlement rules, assets, assessment cycles, etc...
Thanks,
Chrissy
↧
Re: Accounting Entry Reversal while Document Header Text & Reference Number Remains Mandatory
Hi Dawood,
Can you help me understand: In your KB11N screen, why dont you want to enter a Document Header Text?
In my company, we always enter Document Header Texts to help with audits so that the auditor knows what the posting is for. :-)
Thanks,
Chrissy :-)
↧
↧
Re: To exclude MR21 price differences from Material Ledger Actual costing
Hi Sanjay Ram..
You refer to Below FI Document of Arturo's example.
Change in material price=> FI document
Posting date : 20130801
dr) Stock 47500 cr ) UMB 47500
Procurement=>FI Document
Posting Date : 20130731
dr) Stock 200 cr) GRIR 200
Posting Date : 20130801
dr) Stock 50 cr) UMB 50
Pervious Month Material Ledger Closing=>FI Document
Posing Date : 20130731
dr) Stock 95784.72 cr) PRY 95784.72
Posing Date : 20130801
dr) PRY 95784.72 cr) Stock 95784.72
dr) UMB 47550 cr) PRY 47550
Current roll up amount is 48237.72 which have difference between pervious stadnard and
current standard.
↧
Re: Real-time Integration
Hi...
I know that if we don’t use New GL, we should use reconciliation
postingsfrom the reconciliation ledger using t-code “KALC” for
integration between FI and CO.
↧
Re: To exclude MR21 price differences from Material Ledger Actual costing
Hi CHoi
Current roll up amount is 48237.72 which have difference between pervious stadnard and
current standard. >>>>> This is not correct.
The difference between previos and current standard is 47500. This value was post in UMB when i did MR21 and is clear in the ML close, i attach MR21 Fi doc
48237.72 is the difference between Actual Cost and the New Standard, that why this value roll up. Must roll because is part of the actual cost . UMB 47550 of is clear, so the net value is 0. Again, UMB dot roll up!
Arturo.
↧
Re: Real-time Integration
Hi,
I know that if we don't use the Real time Integration the alternative solution is Reconciliation Ledger, But I want to understand Is there any possibility.
Regards
Srinu
↧
↧
Re: To exclude MR21 price differences from Material Ledger Actual costing
Hi...
Amount 48237.72 is composed of umb -47,750 related to change of stadnard cost and
PRY 95,784.72 releated to difference carried over.
↧
Re: ML with Multilevel Price determination "S"
Hi Chandrasekhar,
Let me attempt to answer this question
Please suggest me how ML will work in this case, How RM price difference will distribute.
Ans-
All variance will be moved from lower level(RM) to higher Level(FG).
I suggest you go through this link http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/a5/320e28d56c11d295c200a0c930328a/content.htm Best regards Hrusikesh
↧
Re: Material Ledger: Material Update Structure configuration requirement
Sanjay,
What you are asking for after activating ML is how to wreck it. 
One way (not recommended) is to not activate ML for the material in material master. This will have bizarre consequences. If this material is used in a BOM then ML won't post any documents relating to this material in ML tables which will of course cause all price difference calculations to go wrong. Another way is to make it Price Determination 2 so no ML here.
Makes sense?
Cheers,
TD
↧
Internal Order Creation without Company Code
Hi,
We want to use Real Internal orders across Company codes which are assigned same Controlling area.
We made the Company code field as optional in the field status of Order type.
But when we are creating Internal order without assignment of Company Code then system is giving the error "Company code is not defined F5165'.
When we create the Order by assigning any Object like Plant/Profit center or Cost center then corresponding company code is coming by default.
Is there any way to create an Internal order without Company code?
Thanks & Regards
Madhusekhar Gupta G
↧
↧
Re: No source assignment found for cost element 410005
Hi Hrusikesh,
Thanks for the reply. The issue is resolved. I checked the settlement parameters and found source structure 10 is assigned in the same. I removed it and settlement carried out.
But I am not getting as to how this got assigned in te settlement parameters. Can you explain?
Thanks and regards,
Makrand
↧
Re: No source assignment found for cost element 410005
Hi Babu,
Thanks for the response. I removed Allocation structure and source structure. Also removed source structure from settlement parameters as suggested by Hrusikesh.
The issue is resolved.
Thanks and regards,
Makrand
↧
Re: Material Ledger: Material Update Structure configuration requirement
Hi Toidi,
Is there any reason why you are not considering Arturo's blog http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-45015 as another option?
↧
Re: FB50 Saving layout
Hello Roberta ,
after you drag and drop in the order required , create a variant and make sure the variant is saved in both basic and current settings That way the layout us saved for next time
Thanks
Sirisha
↧
↧
Re: ML with Multilevel Price determination "S"
Hi..
Refer to below process.
=>Daily Transaction
1) Purchasing XYZ Qty 20 Std : 10, Actual : 11
Dr) Stock XYZ 200 CR) GRIR 220
Purchase price differ XYZ 20
2) Purchasing ZYX Qty 20 Std : 20, Actual : 22
DR) Stock ZYX 400 CR) GRIR 440
Purchase price differ ZYX 40
3) Good issue XYZ Qty 15 Std : 10
DR) Material cost XYZ 150 CR) Stock XYZ 150
4) Good issue ZYX Qty 15 Std : 20
DR) Material cost ZYX 300 CR) Stock ZYX 300
5) Good receipt 234 Qty 15 Std : 40
DR) Stock 234 600 CR) Clearing 600
6) Good issue 234 Qty 10 Std : 40
DR) Material cost 234 400 CR) Stock 234 400
7) Good receipt 123 Qty 10 Std : 50
DR) Stock123 500 CR) Clearing 500
8) Good issue 123 Qty 5 Std : 50
DR) Material cost 123 250 CR) Stock 123 250
9) Good receipt ABC Qty 10 Std : 60
DR) StockABC 600 CR) Clearing 600
10) Sold ABC Qty 5 Std 60
DR) COGS 300 CR) Stock ABC 300
=> Monthly Material Ledger Closing
1) Single-level price determination
DR) Stock XYZ 5 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Purchase Qty 20 * price difference 20) CR) Purchase price differ XYZ 20
Transfer price difference to 234 15 ( Good issue qty 15 / Total Purchase Qty 20 * price difference 20)
DR) Stock ZYX 10 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Purchase Qty 20 * price difference 40) CR) Purchase price differ ZYX 40
Transfer price difference to 234 30 ( Good issue qty 15 / Total Purchase Qty 20 * price difference 40)
2) Multi-level price determination
DR) Stock234 5 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Good receipt 15 * price difference 15) CR) Transfer price difference to
234 from XYZ 15
Transfer price difference to 123 from 234 10 ( Good issue qty 10 / Total Good receipt 15
* price difference 15)
DR) Stock 234 10 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Good receipt 15 * price difference 30) CR) Transfer price difference to
234 from ZYX 30
Transfer price difference to 123 from 234 20
( Good issue qty 10 / Total Good receipt 15 * price difference 30)
DR) Stock 123 15 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Good receipt 10 * price difference 30) CR) Transfer price difference
to 123 from 234 30
Transfer price difference to ABC from 123 15
( Good issue qty 5 / Total Good receipt 10 * price difference 30)
DR) Stock ABC 7.5 ( Current Stock 5 / Total Good receipt 10 * price difference 15) CR) Transfer price difference
to ABC from 123 15
Not allocated price difference 7.5
( Sold qty 5 / Total Good receipt 10 * price difference 15)
3) consumption revaluation
DR) COGS ABC 7.5 CR) Not allocated price difference 7.5
=> Current Actual Stock Amount
1) XYZ Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 55 (actual price : 11)
2) ZYX Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 110 (actual price : 22)
3) 234 Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 215 (actual price : 43)
4) 123 Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 235 (actual price : 47)
5) ABC Qty : 5 Actual Amount : 307.5 (actual price : 61.5)
=> Actual COGS ABC : 307.5
↧
price difference for order
for production order, during GR, inventory account and manufacturing output(credit side, P&L account) may have a difference, may I know how this difference is generated? how is value of manufacturing output is determined during production order GR?
↧
zero standard price
we are using split valuation, price control: V, moving average price is 35 USD, but standard price is zero, why standard price is zero, can anyone explain?
↧